The Cell Biological Consequences of Passive Avoidance Training in the Chick

  • Steven P. R. Rose
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 28)


In the late 1960s, Pat Bateson, Gabriel Horn and I began to work together on the cell biology of learning and memory, using imprinting in the young chick as a model. Other papers in this volume describe the elegant way in which the imprinting work has been continued by the Cambridge group. Here, I will review the results of the use of an alternative form of early learning in the young chick, based on a one trial passive avoidance task. The point is that, for the biochemist there are certain disadvantages to studying the sequelae of imprinting as a model for memory. The process of training by exposure to the stimulus is a relatively long one, and this makes it harder to distinguish the cellular events associated with putative memory storage processes from those which are the concomitants of the experience of training. Birds also show a degree of variability in their behaviour during training and the strength of their later preference which can be exploited experimentally but which also adds to the complexity of the analysis.


Passive Avoidance Forebrain Base Passive Avoidance Task Young Chick Chick Brain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aleksidze, N., Potempska, A., Murphy, S. and Rose, S.P.R. 1981, Passive avoidance in the young chick affects forebrain α-bungarotoxin and serotonin binding. Abstr. 8th ISN p.382.Google Scholar
  2. Benowitz, L. 1974, Conditions for the bilateral transfer of monocular learning in the chick, Brain Res. 65:203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benowitz, L. 1980, Functional organization of the avian telencephalon, in: “Comparative Neurology of the Telencephalon” S. Ebbeson, ed., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Benowitz, L. and Lee-Teng, E. 1973, Contrasting effects of three forebrain ablations on discrimination learning and reversal in chickens. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84: 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, P., and Horn, G. 1979, Efferent connections of hyperstriatum ventrale in the chick J. Anat. 128: 414.Google Scholar
  6. Burgoyne, R.D. and Rose, S.P.R. 1982, Subcellular localization of increased incorporation of 3H-fucose following passive avoidance learning in chicks Neurosci. Lett. 19: 343.Google Scholar
  7. Cherkin, A. 1969, Kinetics of memory consolidation: role of amnestic treatment parameters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci (U.S.) 63: 1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulter, J.C. 1982, Chick brain cholinergic receptors, Thesis, Open Univ.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, M.E. and Ng, K.T. 1977, Psychobiology of memory: towards a model of memory formation. Biobehav. Rev. 1: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hambley, J.W., and Rogers, L.J. 1979, Retarded learning induced by amino acids in the neonatal chick, Neurosci., 4: 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haywood, J., Rose, S.P.R. and Bateson, P.P.G. 1970, Effects of an imprinting procedure on RNA polymerase activity in the chick brain, Nature 228: 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horn, G. 1981, Neural mechanisms of learning: an analysis of imprinting in the domestic chick, Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 213: 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horn, G., McCabe, B.J. and Cipolla-Neto, J. 1983, Imprinting in the domestic chick: the role of each side of the hyperstriatum ventrale in acquisition and retention. Exp. Brain Res. 53: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kossut, M., and Rose, S.P.R. 1984, Differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake into chick brain structures during passive avoidance training, Neurosci. 12: 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lossner, B. and Rose, S.P.R. 1983, Passive avoidance training increases fucokinase activity in right forebrain base of day-old chicks, J. Neurochem. 41:1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCabe, N.R. and Rose, S.P.R. (1984) Passive avoidance training increases fucose incorporation into glycoproteins in chick forebrain slices in vitro. Neurochem Res. In press.Google Scholar
  17. Mileusnic, R., Rose, S.P.R., and Tillson, P. 1980, Passive avoidance training results in changes in concentration of and incorporation into colchicine binding proteins in the chick forebrain J. Neurochem. 34: 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogers, L.J. 1982, Light experience and asymmetry of brain function in chickens Nature 297: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers, L.J. and Anson, J.N. 1979, Lateralization of function in the chick forebrain Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10:679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rose, S.P.R. 1977, Early visual experience, learning and neurochemical plasticity in the rat and the chick. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. (B) 278:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose, S.P.R. 1981, What should a biochemistry of learning and memory be about? Neurosci. 6: 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rose, S.P.R. 1982, From causations to translations: a dialectical solution to a reductionist enigma in “Towards a Liberatory Biology”, S.P.R. Rose, ed., Allison & Busby, London.Google Scholar
  23. Rose, S.P.R. and Harding, S. 1984, Training increases 3H-fucose incorporation in chick brain only if followed by memory storage. Neurosci. 12:663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose, S.P.R. and Haywood, J. 1976, Experience, learning and brain metabolism in “Biochemical Correlates of Brain Structure and Function”, A.N. Davison, ed., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, S.P.R., Gibbs, M.E. and Hambley, J.W. 1980, Transient increase in forebrain muscarinic cholinergic receptors following passive avoidance learning in the young chick. Neurosci. 5:169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schliebs, R., Rose, S.P.R. and Stewart, M.G. 1984, Effect of passive avoidance training on in vitro proteins synthesis in forebrain slices of day old chicks, J. Neurochem. In press.Google Scholar
  27. Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Des Rosiers, M.H., Patlak, C.S., Pettigrew, K.D., Sakurada, O., and Shinohara, M. 1977, The 14C-deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose untilisation: theory, procedure and normal values in the conscious and anaesthetized albino rat, J. Neurochem. 28:897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stewart, M.G., Rose, S.P.R. and King, T.S. 1984a, A stereological investigation of synapses in chick palaeostriatum augmentatum and lobus parolfactorius following training on a passive avoidance task, Acta Stereologica. 2: Supp 1 227.Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, M.G., Rose, S.P.R., King, T.S., Gabbott, P.L.A. and Bourne, R., 1984b, Hemispheric asymmetry of synapses in chick medial hyperstriatum ventrale following passive avoidance training: a stereological investigation, Devel. Brain Res.12:261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sukumar, R., Rose, S.P.R., and Burgoyne, R.D. 1980, Increased incorporation of 2H-fucose into chick brain glycoproteins following training on a passive avoidance task. J. Neurochem. 34: 1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven P. R. Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.Brain Research GroupOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations