Temporally Spaced Lesions and Recovery of Function

  • Guy Toniolo
  • Bruno Will
  • Anant Dravid
  • Claude Destrade
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 28)

Abstract

As documented by many clinical reports, it has long been recognized that slow growing lesions, i.e. lesions of “slow momentum” (Riese, 1948), cause less impairments and fewer symptoms than would be expected after similar brain damage that occurs more acutely (e.g., Finger, 1978; Jeannerod and Hecaen, 1979 for rewiews). In order to develop animal models of “lesion momentum” phenomena numerous studies have examined the effects of brain lesions produced in more than one stage, with interoperative intervals ranging from several days to several months (e.g., Finger and Stein, 1982 for a review). Substantial evidence from these experimental studies indicates that behavioral deficits following one-stage cerebral lesions are relatively attenuated or even abolished when virtually equivalent but temporally spaced lesions are produced. Such attenuations of behavioral symptoms due to multi-stage surgery have generally been termed “serial lesion phenomena” (Finger et al., 1973). The first part of this chapter outlines the various approaches utilized in this field and presents a brief summary of the major findings. Particular attention is given to some of the less frequently employed experimental methodologies and we report a study with temporally and structurally spaced lesions in which we included the use of colchicine to produce a “transient” lesion at the time of the first surgery.

Keywords

Attenuation Neurol Gall Choline Stein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adametz, J.H., 1959, Rate of recovery of functioning in cats with rostral reticular lesions. An experimental study, J. Neurosurg., 16:85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avrith, D., Haas, H.L., and Mogenson, G.J., 1979, Behavioral and electrophysiological changes following microinjections of colchicine into the substantia nigra, Neuroscience, 4:227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azmitia, E.C., Buchan, A.M., and Williams, J.H., 1978, Structural and functional restoration by collateral sprouting of hippocampal 5-HT axons, Nature, 274:374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbas, H., and Spear, P., 1976, Effects of serial unilateral and serial bilateral visual cortex lesions on brightness discrimination relearning in rats, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 90:279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, M.M., 1985, Intrinsic determinants of regenerative vigor, in: “Central Nervous System Plasticity and Repair”, A. Bignami, F.E. Bloom, C.L. Bolis and A. Adeloye, eds., Raven Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  6. Cotman, C.W., Lewis, E.R., and Hand, D., 1981, The critical afferent theory: A mechanism to account for septohippocampal development and plasticity, in: “Lesion — Induced Neuronal Plasticity in Sensorimotor Systems”, H. Flohr and W. Precht, eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Cotman, C.W., and Nadler, J.V., 1978, Reactive synaptogenesis in the hippocampus, in: “Neuronal plasticity”, C.W. Cotman, ed., Raven Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  8. Cotman, C.W., and Nieto-Sampedro, M., 1982, Brain function, synapse renewal, and plasticity, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 33:371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotman, C.W., Nieto-Sampedro, M., and Harris, E.W., 1981b, Synapse replacement in the nervous system of adult vertebrates, Physiol, Rev., 61:684.Google Scholar
  10. Crutcher, K.A., Kesner, R.P, and Novak, J.M., 1983, Medial septal lesions, radial arm maze performance, and sympathetic sprouting: A study of recovery of function, Brain Res., 262:91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtis, S.D., and Nonneman, A.J., 1977, Effects of successive bilateral hippocampectomy on DRL performance in rats, Physiol.Behav., 19–707.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, J., Cooper, E., Turner, C., and Maclntyre, L., 1976, Trophic regulation of nerve spouting, Science, 193:371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dieringer, N., and Precht, W., 1977, Modification of synaptic input following unilateral labyrinthectomy, Nature (London), 269:431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dravid, A.R., and Van Deusen, E.B., 1983, Recovery of choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase activities in the ipsilateral hippocampus following unilateral, partial transection of the fimbria in rats, Brain Res., 277:169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dravid, A.R., and Van Deusen, E.B., 1984, Recovery of enzyme markers for cholinergic terminals in septo-temporal regions of the hippocampus following selective fimbrial lesions in adult rats, Brain Res., 324:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, D.L., Alpert, R.M., and Grafstein, B., 1981, Recovery of vision in regeneration of goldfish optic axons: Enhancement of axonal outgrowth by a conditioning lesion, Exp. Neurol., 72:672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fass, B., 1983, Temporal changes in open-field activity following progressive lesions of entorhinal cortex: Evidence for enhanced recovery, Behav. Neural Biol., 37:108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, P.M., Coldham, D.E., and Raisman, G., 1980, Synapses formation after injury in the adult rat brain: Preferential reinnervation of denervated fimbrial sites by axons of the contralateral fimbria, Brain Res., 18:103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finger, S., 1978, Lesion momentum and behavior, in: Recovery from brain damage: Research and theory”, Finger, ed., Plenum, New-York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finger, S., Marshak, R.A., Cohen, M., Scheff, S., Trace, R., and Niemand, D., 1971, Effects of successive and simultaneous lesions of somatosensory cortex on tactile discrimination in the rat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 77:221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finger, S., and Stein, D.G., Fast-versus slow-growing lesions and behavioral recovery, in: “Brain Damage and Recovery. Research and Clinical Perspectives”, S. Finger and D.G. Stein, eds., Academic Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  22. Finger, S., Walbran, B., and Stein, D.G., 1973, Brain damage and behavioral recovery: Serial lesion phenomena, Brain Res., 63:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flourens, P., 1824, Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux chez les animaux vertébrés, Crevot, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Forman, D.S., McQuarrie, I.G., Grafstein, B., and Edwards, D.L., 1981, Effect of a conditioning lesion on axonal regeneration and recovery of function, in: “Lesion — Induced Neuronal Plasticity in Sensorimotor Systems”, H. Flohr and W. Precht, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Forman, D.S., McQuarrie, I.G., Labore, F.W., Wood, D.K., Stone, L.S., Braddock, C.H., and Fuchs, D.A., 1980, Time course of the conditioning lesion effect on axonal regeneration, Brain Res., 182:180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frötscher, M., 1983, Dendritic plasticity in response to partial deafferentation, in: “Neurobiology of the Hippocampus”, W. Seiffert, ed., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  27. Fuller, J.L., 1967, Experiential deprivation and later behavior, Science, 158:1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gage, F.H., BJörklund, A., and Stenevi, U., 1983, Reinnervation of the partially deafferented hippocampus by compensatory collateral sprouting from spared cholinergic and noradrenergic afferents, Brain Res., 268:27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gage, F.H., Björklund, A., and Stenevi, U., 1984, Cells of origin of the ventral cholinergic septo-hippocampal pathway undergoing compensatory collateral sprouting following fimbria-fornix transection, Neurosci. Lett., 44:211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gage, F.H., Björklund, A., Stenevi, U., and Dunnett, S.B., 1983, Functional correlates of compensatory collateral sprouting by aminergic and cholinergic afferents in the hippocampal formation, Brain Res., 268:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gall, C., and Lynch, G., 1981, The regulation of sprouting in the adult hippocampus: Some insights from developmental studies, in: “Lesion — Induced Neuronal Plasticity on Sensorimotor Systems”, H. Flohr and W. Precht, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Gentile, A.M., Green, S., Nieburgs, A., Schmelzer, W., and Stein, D.G., 1978, Disruption and recovery of locomotor and manipulatory behavior following cortical lesions in rats, Behav. Biol., 22:417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glick, S.D., and Greenstein, S., 1972, Facilitation of recovery after hypothalamic damage by prior ablation of frontal cortex, Nature, 239:187.Google Scholar
  34. Glick, S.D., Greenstein, S., and Zimmerberg, B., 1972, Facilitation of recovery by alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine after lateral hypothalamic damage, Science, 177:534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldberger, M.E., and Murray, M., 1974, Restitution of function and collateral sprouting in the cat spinal cord: The deafferented animal, J. Comp. Neurol., 158:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldowitz, D., and Cotman, C.W., 1980, Do neurotrophic interactions control synapse formation in the adult rat brain, Brain Res., 181:325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goldschmidt, R.B., and Steward, O., 1982, Neurotoxic effects of colchicine: Differential susceptibility of CNS neuronal populations, Neuroscience, 7:695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grafstein, B., and McQuarrie, I.G., 1978, Role of the nerve cell body in axonal regeneration, in: “Neuronal Plasticity”, C.W. Cotman, Ed., Raven Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  39. Guth, L., Smith, S., Donati, E.J., and Albuquerque, E.X., 1980, Induction of intramuscular collateral nerve sprouting by neurally applied colchicine, Exp. Neurol, 67:513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gutman, E., 1942, Factors affecting recovery of motor function after nerve lesions, J. Neurol. Psyhiatr., 5:81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall-Graggs, E.C.B., and Brand, P., 1977, Effects of previous nerve injury on the regeneration of free autogenous muscle grafts, Exp. Neurol., 57:275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamori, J., and Silakov, V.L., 1980, Plasticity of relay neurons in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the adult cat: Morphological evidence, Neurosci., 5:2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Isseroff, A., Leveton, L., Freeman, G., Lewis, M.E., and Stein, D.G., 1976, Differences in the behavioral effects of single-stage and serial leions of the hippocampus, Exp. Neurol., 53:339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jackson, J.H., 1881, Remarks on the dissolution of the nervous system as exemplified by certain post-epileptic conditions, Medical Press and Circular, 1:329.Google Scholar
  45. Jeannerod, M., and Hecaen, H., 1979, Adaptation et restauration des fonctions nerveuses, Simep, Villeurbanne.Google Scholar
  46. Kleitman, N., and Camille, N., 1932, Studies on the physiology of sleep. VI. The behavior of decorticated dogs, Am. J. Physiol., 100:474.Google Scholar
  47. Lashley, K.S., 1929, “Brain mechanisms and intelligence”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loesche, J., and Steward, O., 1977, Behavioral correlates of denervation and reinnervation of the hippocampal formation of the rat: Recovery of alternation performance following unilateral entorhinal cortex lesions, Brain Res. Bull., 2:31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Le Vere, T.E., 1980, Recovery of function after brain damage: A theory of the behavioral deficit, Physiol. Psychol., 8:297.Google Scholar
  50. Mc Couch, G.P., Austin, G.M., Lin, C.N., and Lun, C.Y., 1958, Sprouting as a cause of spasticity, J. Neurophysiol., 21:205.Google Scholar
  51. Mc Quarrie, I.G., 1978, The effect of a conditioning lesion on the regeneration of motor axons, Brain Res., 152:597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murray, M., and Goldberger, M.E., 1974, Restitution of function of collateral sprouting in the cat spinal cord: The partially hemisected animal, J. Comp. Neurol., 158:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oblinger, M.M., and Lasek, R.J., 1984, A conditioning lesion of the peripheral axons of dorsal root ganglion cells accelerates regeneration of only their peripheral axons, J. Neurosci., 4:1736.Google Scholar
  54. Panksepp, J., Meeker, R., Reilly, P., and Vilberg, T., 1976, Reversible CNS lesions and disruption of self-stimulation by inhibition of axoplasmic flow, in: “Brain-Stimulation Reward”, A. Wauquier and E.T. Rolls, eds., Elsevier, New-York.Google Scholar
  55. Patrissi, G., and Stein, D.G., Temporal factors in recovery of function after brain damage, Exp. Neurol., 47:470.Google Scholar
  56. Perisic, M., and Cuenod, M., 1972, Synaptic transmission depressed by colchicine blockade of axoplasmic flow, Science, 175:1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pilar, G., and Landmesser, L., 1972, Axotomy mimicked by localized colchicine application, Science, 171:1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Riese, W., Aphasia in brain tumors, Confin.Neurol., 9:64.Google Scholar
  59. Reyes, R., 1977, Effects of interlesion interval and postoperative recovery period on recovery of function following serial lesions of somatic cortex in rats, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University.Google Scholar
  60. Scheff, W., Bernardo, L., and Cotman, C.W., 1977, Progressive brain damage accelerates axon sprouting in the adult rat, Science, 197:795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scheff, S.W., Bernardo, L.S., and Cotman, C.W., 1978, Effect of serial lesions on sprouting in the dentate gyrus: Onset and decline of the catalytic effect, Brain Res., 150:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheff, S.W., and Cotman, C.W., 1977, Recovery of spontaneous alternation following lesions of the entorhinal cortex in adult rats: Possible correlation to axon sprouting, Behav. Biol., 21:286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scheff, S., and Wright, D.C., 1976, Behavioral and electro- physiological evidence for cortical reorganization of function in rats with serial lesions of the visual cortex, Physiol. Psychol., 5:103.Google Scholar
  64. Schneider, G.E., 1973, Early lesions of superior colliculus: Factors affecting the formation of abnormal retinal pojections, Brain Behav. Evol., 8:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sebille, A., and Bondoux-Jahan, M., 1980, Effects of electric stimulation and previous nerve injury on motor function recovery in rats, Brain Res., 193:362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stein, D.G., 1974, Some variables influencing recovery of funcion in the rat, in: “CNS Plasticity: Recovery of function”, D.G. Stein, J. Rosen and N. Butters, eds., Academic Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  67. Stein, D.G., and Lewis M.E., 1975, Functional recovery after brain damage in adult organisms, in: “Aspects of Neural Plasticity”, F. Vital-Durand and M. Jeannerod, eds., Colloques INSERM, Paris.Google Scholar
  68. Steward, O., Loesche, J., and Horten, W.C., 1977, Behavioral correlation of denervation and reinnervation of the hippocampal formation of the rat: Open-field activity and cue utilization following bilateral entorhinal cortex lesions, Brain Res. Bull., 2:41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teitelbaum, P., 1971, The encephalization of hunger, in: “Progress in Physiological Psychology”, E. Stellar and J.M. Sprague, eds., Academic Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  70. Toniolo, G., and Will, B., 1983, Effects of fimbria-fornix “conditioning” lesions on behavioral recovery from subsequent hippocampal lesions in rats, III European Winter Conf., Abstracts.Google Scholar
  71. Toniolo, G., Dravid, A., Destrade, C., and Will, B., 1984, Conditioning lesions and recovery of cognitive functions, EBBS-SFECA Workshop, Abstracts.Google Scholar
  72. Treichler, R.F., 1975, Two-stage frontal lesion influences upon severity of delayed-response deficit, Behav. Biol., 13:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Von Monakow, C., 1910, Neue Gesichtspunkte in der Frage nach der Lokalization im Grosshirn, J.F. Bergman, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  74. Will, B., and Stein, D.G., 1981, La recuperation après lésions cerebrales, Pour la Science, 43:66.Google Scholar
  75. Will, B., and Toniolo, G., 1983, Both transitory and irreversible fimbria/fornix “conditioning” lesions facilitate recovery from bilateral hippocampal lesions, Soc. Neurosci. Abstracts, 9:946.Google Scholar
  76. Zolovick, A.J., Avrith, D., and Jalowiec, J.E., 1977, Reversible colchicine-induced disruption of amygdaloid function in sodium appetite, Brain Res. Bull., 5:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Toniolo
    • 1
  • Bruno Will
    • 1
  • Anant Dravid
    • 2
  • Claude Destrade
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie des ComportementsUniversité Louis PasteurStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Preclinical ResearchSandoz LtdBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Laboratoire de PsychophysiologieUniversité de Bordeaux IBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations