Dissociation of Two Behavioral Functions in the Monkey after Early Hippocampal Ablations

  • Helen Mahut
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 28)

Abstract

Bilateral excisions of medial temporal lobe structures (uncinate-amygdaloid region, hippocampus, hippocampal gyrus) in patients suffering from long-standing psychotic, or epileptic, symptoms resulted in a well-known severe anterograde amnesia (Scoville, 1954; Scoville and Milner, 1957). Subsequent clinical evidence pointed to the hippocampus as the critical structure in the memory loss (Penfield and Milner, 1958; Milner and Teuber, 1968; Milner, Corkin and Teuber, 1968).

Keywords

Neurol Paraffin Tray Univer Reten 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, D.N. and Baddeley, A., 1976, What can amnesic patients learn? Neuro-psychologia, 14:111.Google Scholar
  2. Cermak, L.S. and Butters, N., 1972, The role of interference and encoding in the short-term deficits of Korsakoff patients. Neuropsychologia, 10: 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, N.J. and Squire, L.R., 1980, Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210–207.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, N.J., Eichenbaum, H., DeAcado, B. and Corkin, S. Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
  5. Corkin, S., 1965, Tactually-guided maze learning in man: Effects of unilateral cortical excisions and bilateral hippocampal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 3:339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowey, A. and Gross, C.G., 1970, Effects of foveal prestriate and infero-temporal lesions on visual discrimination by rhesus monkeys. Exper. Brain Res., 11:128.Google Scholar
  7. Gaffan, D., 1974, Recognition impaired and association intact in the memory of monkeys after transection of the fornix, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 86:1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirsh, R., 1974, The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory, Behav. Biol., 12:421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirsh, R. and Krajden, J., 1982, The hippocampus and the expression of knowledge, in: “The expression of knowledge”, R.L. Isaacson and N.E. Spear, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Iwai, E. and Mishkin, M., 1968, Two visual foci in the temporal lobe of monkeys. Paper presented at the Japan-US joint seminar on neurophysiology of memory, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  11. Kirk, R.E., 1968, Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, Brooks-Cole, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Lhermitte, F. and Signoret, J.L., 1972, Analyse neuropsychologique et differenciation des syndromes amnesiques, Rev. Neurol., 126:161.Google Scholar
  13. Mahut, H., 1971, Spatial and object reversal learning in monkeys with partial temporal lobe ablations, Neuropsychologia, 9:409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahut, H. and Cordeau, J.P., 1964, Some long-term effects of temporal lobe resections on auditory and visual discrimination in monkeys, Brain, 87:177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahut, H. and Moss, M., 1984, Consolidation of memory: the hippocampus revisited, in: “Neuropsychology of memory”, L.R. Squire and N. Butters, eds., Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Mahut, H. and Moss, M., The Monkey and the Sea Horse, in: “The hippocampus”, R.L. Isaacson and K.H. Pribram, eds., Plenum Press, New York. In press.Google Scholar
  17. Mahut, H., Moss, M. and Zola-Morgan, S., 1981, Retention deficits after combined amygdalo-hippocampal and selective hippocampal resections in the monkey, Neuropsychologia, 19:201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahut, H. and Zola, S., 1973, A non-modality specific impairment in spatial learning after fornix lesions in monkeys, Neuropsychologia, 11:255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahut, H. and Zola, S., 1977, Ontogenetic time-table for the development of three functions in infant macaques and the effect of early hippocampal damage upon them, Abst. Soc. Neurosci., 3:428.Google Scholar
  20. Mahut, H., Zola-Morgan, S. and Moss, M., 1982, Hippocampal resections impair associative learning and recognition memory in the monkey. J. Neurosci., 2:1214.Google Scholar
  21. Milner, B., 1962, Les troubles de la mémoire accompagnant des lesions hippocampiques bilatérales, in: Physiologie de l’hippocampe, P. Passouant, ed., CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Milner, B. and Teuber, H.-L., 1968, Alteration of perception and memory in man: Reflections on methods, in: “Analysis of behavioral change”, L. Weiskrantz, ed., Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Milner, B., Corkin, S. and Teuber, H.-L. 1968, Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M. Neuropsychologia, 6:215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mishkin, M. and Delacour, J., 1975, An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey. J. Exper. Psychol.: Animal Behav. Processes, 1:326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishkin, M. and Oubre, J.L., 1976, Dissociation of deficits on visual memory tasks after inferior temporal and amygdala lesions in monkeys, Abst., Soc. Neurosci, 2:1127.Google Scholar
  26. Moss, M., Mahut, H. and Zola-Morgan, S., 1981, Concurrent discrimination learning of monkeys after hippocampal, entorhinal or fornix lesions, J. Neurosci., 1:227.Google Scholar
  27. O’Keefe, J. and Nadel, L., 1978, The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Olton, D.S., Becker, J.T. and Handelman, G. E., 1979, Hippocampus, space and memory, Behav.Brain Sci., 2:313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Penfield, W. and Milner, B., 1958, Memory deficit produced by bilateral lesions in the hippocampal zone. A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 79: 475.Google Scholar
  30. Prisko, L.H., 1963, Short-term memory in focal cerebral damage. Unpub. Doct. Dissert., McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  31. Rehbein, L. and Mahut, H., 1983, Long-term deficits in association and spatial recognition memory after early hippocampal damage in monkeys. Abst., Soc. Neurosci., 9:639.Google Scholar
  32. Rehbein, L., Mahut, H., and Moss, M., Hippocampal ablations in infant monkeys: A long-term assessment of behavioral change. In preparation, to be submitted to J. Neurosci.Google Scholar
  33. Rehbein, L., Zola-Morgan, S., Mahut, H. and Moss, M., 1980, Failure of sparing, or recovery, of recognition memory after early hippocampal resections in the rhesus macaque, Abst., Soc. Neurosci., 6:88.Google Scholar
  34. Scoville, W.B., 1954, The limbic lobe in man., J.Neurosurg., 11:64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scoville, W.B. and Milner, B., 1957, Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol, Neurosurg. Psychiat., 20:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sidman, M., Stoddard, L.T. and Mohr, J.P., 1968, Some additional quantitative observations of immediate memory in a patient with bilateral hippocampal lesions, Neuropsychologia, 6:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warrington, E.K. and Weiskrantz, L., 1968, New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients, Nature, 217:972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weiskrantz, L. and Warrington, E.K., 1979, Conditioning in amnesic patients, Neuropsychologia, 17:187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zola, S., 1973, The effects of fornix transection on reversal learning in the monkey. Unpub. Doct. Dissert., Northeastern Univer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Zola, S. and Mahut, J., 1973, Paradoxical facilitation of object reversal learning after fornix lesions in monkeys, Neuropsychologia, 11:271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zola-Morgan, S., Dabrowska, J., Moss, M. and Mahut, H., 1983, Enhanced preference for perceptual novelty in the monkey after section of the fornix but not after ablation of the hippocampus, Neuropsychologia, 21:433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Mahut
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations