A Comparison of the Halstead-Reitan, Luria-Nebraska, and Flexible Batteries Through Case Presentations
The purpose of this chapter is that of illustrating, through the presentation of three cases, the similarities and differences among various approaches to neuropsychological assessment discussed elsewhere in this volume. The first two patients were given the Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB) and Luria-Nebraska Neurological Battery (LNNB); one is a patient with a neurological illness, whereas the other is a psychiatric patient. The third case is also a neurological patient; he received the LNNB and a specialized series of tests selected on the basis of the preliminary information provided by the LNNB results. Thus, we have a comparison of two standard batteries with a neurological and a psychiatric patient, and a combined standard battery and flexible approach in a patient with an unusual neuropsychological syndrome. In each case, efforts were made to correlate the findings for the patients with pertinent literature regarding the disorder each of the patients represents. The first two cases were selected, in part, because there is an available literature for both standard batteries covering the disease entities the represent, Huntington’s disease and schizophrenia. With regard to the third presentation, there is a case literature available, and the patient was compared to similar cases.
KeywordsNeuropsychological Assessment Thalamic Lesion Chronic Schizophrenic Patient Wide Range Achievement Thalamic Infarction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Benton, A. L. (1974). The Visual Retention Test ( 4th ed. ). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1978). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City: Benton Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals.Google Scholar
- Crosson, B., Parker, J. C., Warren, R. L., La Breche, T., & Tully, R. (1983, August). Dominant thalamic lesion with and without aphasia. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
- Lezak, M. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lezak, M. D., & O’Brien, K. ( 1981, February). A comparison of traumatically brain injured and control subjects on verbal and pictorial presentations of a learning task. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
- Osterreith, P. A. (1944). Le test de copie d’une figure complexe. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 206–356.Google Scholar
- Rao, S. M., Hammeke, T. A., McQuillen, M. P., Khatri, B. O., & Lloyd, D. (in press). Memory disturbance in chronic, progressive multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology.Google Scholar
- Rey, A. L. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
- Russell, E. W., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
- Shelly, C., & Goldstein, G. (1983). Discrimination of chronic schizophrenia and brain damage with the Luria-Nebraska battery: A partially successful replication. Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 82–85.Google Scholar
- Taylor, E. M. (1959). Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral deficits. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar