Advertisement

A Comparison of the Halstead-Reitan, Luria-Nebraska, and Flexible Batteries Through Case Presentations

  • Gerald Goldstein
  • Theresa Incagnoli

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is that of illustrating, through the presentation of three cases, the similarities and differences among various approaches to neuropsychological assessment discussed elsewhere in this volume. The first two patients were given the Halstead-Reitan Battery (HRB) and Luria-Nebraska Neurological Battery (LNNB); one is a patient with a neurological illness, whereas the other is a psychiatric patient. The third case is also a neurological patient; he received the LNNB and a specialized series of tests selected on the basis of the preliminary information provided by the LNNB results. Thus, we have a comparison of two standard batteries with a neurological and a psychiatric patient, and a combined standard battery and flexible approach in a patient with an unusual neuropsychological syndrome. In each case, efforts were made to correlate the findings for the patients with pertinent literature regarding the disorder each of the patients represents. The first two cases were selected, in part, because there is an available literature for both standard batteries covering the disease entities the represent, Huntington’s disease and schizophrenia. With regard to the third presentation, there is a case literature available, and the patient was compared to similar cases.

Keywords

Neuropsychological Assessment Thalamic Lesion Chronic Schizophrenic Patient Wide Range Achievement Thalamic Infarction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benton, A. L. (1974). The Visual Retention Test ( 4th ed. ). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1978). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City: Benton Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals.Google Scholar
  3. Boll, T. J., Heaton, R., & Reitan, R. M. (1974). Neuropsychological and emotional correlates of Huntington’s chorea. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 158, 61–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chelune, G. J., Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R. A., & Robinson, A. (1979). Level versus pattern of neuropsychological performance among schizophrenics and diffusely brain damaged patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 155–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crosson, B., Parker, J. C., Warren, R. L., La Breche, T., & Tully, R. (1983, August). Dominant thalamic lesion with and without aphasia. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hulicka, I. (1966). Age differences in Wechsler Memory Scale scores. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 109, 135–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones-Gotman, M., & Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: The invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 653–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lezak, M. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lezak, M. D., & O’Brien, K. ( 1981, February). A comparison of traumatically brain injured and control subjects on verbal and pictorial presentations of a learning task. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  11. Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCue, M., Shelly, C., Goldstein, G. & Katz-Garris, L. (1984). Neuropsychological aspects of learning disability in young adults. Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moses, J. A., Golden, C. J., Berger, P. A., & Wisniewski, A. M. (1981). Neuropsychological deficits in early, middle, and late stage Huntington’s disease as measured by the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. International Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 95–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ojemann, G. A., & Fedio, P. (1968). Effect of stimulation of the human thalamus and parietal and temporal white matter on short-term memory. Journal of Neurosurgery, 29, 51–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ojemann, G. A., Blick, K. I., & Ward, Jr., A. A. (1971). Improvement and disturbance of short-term verbal memory with human ventrolateral thalamic stimulation. Brain, 94, 225–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osterreith, P. A. (1944). Le test de copie d’une figure complexe. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 206–356.Google Scholar
  18. Purisch, A. D., Golden, C. J., & Hammeke, T. A. (1978). Discrimination of schizophrenic and brain-injured patients by a standardized version of Luria’s neuropsychological tests. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1266–1273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rao, S. M., Hammeke, T. A., McQuillen, M. P., Khatri, B. O., & Lloyd, D. (in press). Memory disturbance in chronic, progressive multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology.Google Scholar
  20. Rey, A. L. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, E. W. (1975). A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43 (6), 800–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Russell, E. W., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  23. Shelly, C., & Goldstein, G. (1983). Discrimination of chronic schizophrenia and brain damage with the Luria-Nebraska battery: A partially successful replication. Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 82–85.Google Scholar
  24. Speedie, L. J., & Heilman, K. (1983). Anterograde memory deficits for visuospatial material after infarction of the right thalamus. Archives of Neurology, 40, 183–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Squire, L. R., & Moore, R. Y. (1979). Dorsal thalamic lesion in a noted case of human memory dysfunction. Annals of Neurology, 6, 503–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Squire, L. R., & Slater, P. C. (1978). Anterograde and retrograde memory impairment in chronic amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 16, 313–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, E. M. (1959). Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral deficits. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Teuber, H.-L., Milner, B., & Vaughan, H. G. (1968). Persistent anterograde amnesia after stab wound of the basal brain. Neuropsychologia, 6, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Goldstein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Theresa Incagnoli
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Veterans Administration Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Veterans Administration Medical CenterNorthportUSA
  4. 4.School of MedicineState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations