Advertisement

Epidemiological Reservations about Risk Assessment

  • Richard Peto
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series

Abstract

The term risk assessment is used to describe three quite different types of activity, two of which are reasonably well-founded, and one of which is not. The fundamental problem is, of course, that reliable evidence of human hazard exists for only a few dozen of the thousands of chemicals that are of potential concern. Where it does exist, there should, in principle, be no great difficulty in using it, although the long-running arguments about the risks associated with various levels of radiation illustrate the gap that can exist between principle and practice.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Human Papilloma Virus Lung Cancer Risk Hormonal Factor Cigarette Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, B.N., 1983, Dietary carcinogens and anti-carcinogens, Science, 221:1256; also subsequent correspondence (Science, 1984, 224:668, 757).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doll, R., and Peto, R., 1981a, The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 66:1191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Doll, R., and Peto, R., 1981b, Why cancer? The causes of cancer in developed countries, in: “The Times Health Supplement,” November 6, 1981, pp. 12–14, The Times, London.Google Scholar
  4. Doll, R. and Peto, R. (1983) The epidemiology of cancer, in: “The Oxford Textbook of Medicine,” pp. 4.51–4.79, D.J. Weatherall, J.D. Ledingham, and D.A. Warrell, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1984, “Second Cancers in Relation to Radiation Treatment: Results of a Cancer Registry Collaboration,” Scientific publication No. 52, N.E. Day and J.C. Boice Jr., eds., IARC Publications, Lyon.Google Scholar
  6. Peto, R. 1981, Trends in U.S. cancer onset rates, in: “Quantification of Occupational Cancer,” pp. 269–284, R. Peto and M.A. Schneiderman, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Publications, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Peto
    • 1
  1. 1.Radcliffe InfirmaryOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations