Epidemiological Reservations about Risk Assessment
The term risk assessment is used to describe three quite different types of activity, two of which are reasonably well-founded, and one of which is not. The fundamental problem is, of course, that reliable evidence of human hazard exists for only a few dozen of the thousands of chemicals that are of potential concern. Where it does exist, there should, in principle, be no great difficulty in using it, although the long-running arguments about the risks associated with various levels of radiation illustrate the gap that can exist between principle and practice.
KeywordsRisk Assessment Human Papilloma Virus Lung Cancer Risk Hormonal Factor Cigarette Consumption
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Doll, R., and Peto, R., 1981b, Why cancer? The causes of cancer in developed countries, in: “The Times Health Supplement,” November 6, 1981, pp. 12–14, The Times, London.Google Scholar
- Doll, R. and Peto, R. (1983) The epidemiology of cancer, in: “The Oxford Textbook of Medicine,” pp. 4.51–4.79, D.J. Weatherall, J.D. Ledingham, and D.A. Warrell, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1984, “Second Cancers in Relation to Radiation Treatment: Results of a Cancer Registry Collaboration,” Scientific publication No. 52, N.E. Day and J.C. Boice Jr., eds., IARC Publications, Lyon.Google Scholar
- Peto, R. 1981, Trends in U.S. cancer onset rates, in: “Quantification of Occupational Cancer,” pp. 269–284, R. Peto and M.A. Schneiderman, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Publications, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar