Advertisement

Low-Level Exposures To Chemical Carcinogens: Mutational End Points

  • William R. Lee
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series

Abstract

The choice of a mutational end point has an important bearing on both: (1) extrapolation from relatively high doses in laboratory animals to the much lower doses that are typical in environmental situations and (2) extrapolation from laboratory test systems to humans. Extrapolation from relatively high doses to the low doses typical in environmental situations is dependent on the shape of the dose-response curve. In vivo mutagenesis in eukaryotes usually consists of describing the relation of exposure of the whole organism to the mutation frequency. This conventional approach has the effect of placing the entire organism in a “black box” in which there are no intermediate determinants between exposure of the entire organism and observed mutation frequency in succeeding generations. To avoid combining physiological differences with mutagenic differences, I will distinguish between the dose to the target of interest — DNA — and exposure of a whole organism. In previous publications (Lee, 1976, 1978 and 1983) we have discussed the partitioning of the exposure to genetic response curve into an exposure-dose response curve and a dose-genetic response curve. The importance of this partitioning is to enable one to study physiology separately from the mutation process.

Keywords

Spontaneous Mutant Reciprocal Translocation Chemical Carcinogen Ethyl Methanesulfonate Ethyl Methane Sulfonate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, C. S., 1976, Molecular dosimetry of chemical mutagens. Selection of appropriate target molecules for determining molecular dose to the germ line, Mutat. Res., 38: 303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaron, C. S., 1979, X-ray induced mutations affects the level of enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophia melanogaster: Frequency and genetic analysis of the null enzyme mutants, Mutat. Res., 63: 127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aaron, C. S., and Lee, W. R., 1978, Molecular dosimetry of the mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate in Drosophila melanogaster spermatozoa: Linear relation of DNA alkylation per sperm cell (dose) to sex-linked recessive lethals, Mutat. Res., 49: 27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abrahamson, S., and Meyer, H. U., 1976, Quadratic analysis for the induction of recessive lethal mutations in Drosophila oogonia by x-irradiation, in: “Biological and Environmental Effects of Low Level Radiation,” pp. 9–17, IAEA-SM-202/100, Vienna.Google Scholar
  5. Ashburner, M., Aaron, C. S., and Tsubota, S., 1982, The genetics of a small autosomal region of Drosophila melanogaster, including the structural gene for alcohol dehydrogenase. V. Characterization of x-ray-induced Adh null mutations, Genetics, 102: 421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow, J. F., 1982, Chairman, Committee on Chemical Environmental Mutagens, Identifying and Estimating the Genetic Impact of Chemical Environmental Mutagens, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Generoso, W. M., Russell, W. L., Huff, S. W., Stout, S. K., and Gosselee, D. G., 1974, Effects of dose on the induction of dominant-lethal mutations and heritable translocations with ethyl methanesulfonate in male mice, Genetics, 77: 741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelley, M. R., Mims, I. P., Farnet, C. M., Dicharry, S. A., and Lee, W. R., Molecular analysis of x-ray induced alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) null mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Lee, W. R., 1976, Molecular dosimetry of chemical mutagens: Determination of molecular dose to the germ line, Mutat. Res., 38: 311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, W. R., 1978, Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryote germ cells, in: “Chemical Mutagens,” pp. 177–202, A. Hollaender and F. J. de Serres, eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, W. R., 1983, Macromolecular dosimetry, in: “Developments in the Science and Practice of Toxicology,” pp. 281–288, A. W. Hayes, R. C. Schnell, and T. S. Miya, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, W. R. (Leader), Abrahamson, S., Valencia, R., von Halle, E. S., Wurgler, F. E., and Zimmering, S., 1983, The sex-linked recessive lethal test for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program, Mutat. Res., 123: 183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Muller, H. J., 1940, An analysis of the process of structural change in chromosomes of Drosophila, J. Genetics, 40: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Research Council, Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, 1980, “The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation,” National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Sega, G. A., Gumming, R. B., and Walton, M. F., 1974, Dosimetry studies on the ethylation of mouse sperm DNA after invivo exposure to (3H)-ethyl methanesulfonate, Mutat. Res., 24: 317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Valencia, R. (Leader), Abrahamson, S., Lee, W. R., von Halle, E. S., Woodruff, R. C., Wurgler, F. E., and Zimmering, S., Chromosome mutation tests for mutagenesis in Drosophila melano-gaster: A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Submitted to Mutat. Res.Google Scholar
  17. Vogel, E., and Natarajan, A. T., 1979, The relation between reaction kinetics and mutagenic action of mono-functional alkylating agents in higher eukaryotic systems. I. Recessive lethal mutations and translocations in Drosophila, Mutat. Res., 62: 51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations