Advertisement

How Can We Best Evaluate, and Compensate for, Genetic Hazards in the Environment and Workplace

  • James V. Neel

Abstract

Much of this conference has been concerned with issues created by the “New Genetics,” however that be defined. We have turned in this closing session to a much less spectacular issue, but an issue that, in the aggregate, will probably impact, directly or indirectly, on just as many people as any of the other issues covered at this meeting. I refer to the question of the genetic implications of a wide variety of potentially mutagenic exposures in the workplace and the environment.

Keywords

Environmental Protection Agency Legal Action Sister Chromatid Exchange Doubling Dose Cigarette Smoke Condensate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Engle, R. L., and White, M. K., Fiscal Implementations of a Mil/Kilowatt Hour Waste Management Fee ,Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1982), Document 4513.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Land, C. E., Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation, Science 209:1197–1203 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Denniston, C., Low level radiation and genetic risk estimation in man, Ann. Rev. Genet. 16:329–55 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neel, J. V., Frequency of spontaneous and induced point mutations in higher eukaryotes, J. Hexed. 74:2–15 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohn, H. I., Radiation genetics: The mouse’s view. Rad. Res. 94:1–9 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyon, M. F., Problems in extrapolation of animal data to humans, in Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk (F. J. deSerres and W. Sheridan, eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1983), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schull, W. J., Otake, M., and Neel, J. V. A reappraisal of the genetic effects of the atomic bombs: Summary of a thirty-four year study, Science 213:1220–7 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neel, J. V., Nishimoto, Y., Goriki, K., Satoh, C., Fujita, M., and Yoshimoto, Y., Epidemiological studies of germ cell mutation in human populations, with particular reference to groups with unusual chemical exposures, in Methods for Estimating Risk of Chemical Injury: Human and Non-human Biota and Ecosystems (V. B. Vouk, G. L. Butler, D. G. Hoel, and D. B. Peakall, eds.), Wiley & Sons, Sussex (1985), 327–342.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neel, J. V., Rosenblum, B. B., Sing, C. F., Skolnick, M. M., Hanash, S. M., and Sternberg, S., Adapting two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to the study of human germ-line mutation rates, in Methods and Applications of Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins (J. E. Celis, ed.), Academic Press, New York (1984), 259–306.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skolnick, M. M., Sternberg, S. R., and Neel, J. V., Computer programs for adapting two-dimensional gels to the study of mutation, Clin. Chem. 28:969–78 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skolnick, M. M., An approach to completely automatic comparison of two-dimensional electrophoresis gels, Clin. Chem. 28:979–86 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bond, V. P., The medical effects of radiation, in Proceedings, Thirteenth Annual Convention, National Association Claimant’s Counsel of America ,W. H. Anderson, Cincinnati, (1959), 117–28.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bond, V. P., The cancer risk attributable to radiation exposure: Some practical problems, Hlth. Phys. 40:108–11 (1981).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bond, V. P., Statement. Hearings on Radiation Exposure Compensation Act of 1981 (S. 1483). GPO, Washington (1982), 242–257.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oftedal, P., Kunt, M., and Torlief, H., On the probability of radiation being the cause of cancer, Br J Radiol. 41:711–2(1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolata, G. B., Love Canal: False alarm caused by botched study, Science 208:1239–42 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Picianno, D., Comment on Love Canal, Science 209:754–5 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamasaki, E., and Ames, B. N., Concentration of mutagens from urine by absorption with the nonpolar resin XAD-2: Cigarette smokers have mutagenic urine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 74:3555–9 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hopkin, J. M., and Evans, H. J., Cigarette smoke condensates damaged DNA in human lymphocytes, Nature 279:241–2 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Obe, G., and Herha, J., Chromosomal aberrations in heavy smokers, Hum. Genet. 41:259–63 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lambert, B., Linblad, A., Nordenskjold, M., and Werelius, B., Increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in cigarette smokers, Hereditas 88:147–9 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hopkin, J. M, and Evans, H. J., Cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage and lung cancer risks, Nature 283:388–90 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Livingston, G. K., Cannon, L. A., Bishop, D. T., Johnson, P., and Fineman, R. M., Sister chromatid exchange: Variation by age, sex, smoking, and breast cancer status, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 9:289–98 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hollander, D. H., Tockman, M. S., Liang, Y. W., Borgaonkar, D. S., and Frost, J. K., Sister chromatic exchanges in the peripheral blood of cigarette smokers and in lung cancer patients; and the effects of chemotherapy, Hum. Genet. 44:165–171 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Aubrey Milunsky and George J. Annas 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • James V. Neel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Genetics Kresge I, Room 4560University of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations