Advertisement

Social Policy Considerations in Noncoital Reproduction

  • George J. Annas
  • Sherman Elias

Abstract

Nineteen eighty-four witnessed significant scientific and societal developments in noncoital human reproduction. On the scientific side, the year saw the first birth from surrogate embryo transfer (SET)1 and the first birth from a frozen embryo.2 On the societal side, the year saw reports by government-appointed panels on noncoital reproduction in the United Kingdom (the Warnock Report)3 and Australia (the Waller Report),4 and Congressional hearings on the subject in the United States.5

Keywords

Human Embryo Artificial Insemination Infertile Woman Infertile Couple Sperm Donor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bustillo, M., Buster, J. E., Cohen, S. W., et al. ,Nonsurgical ovum transfer as a treatment in infertile women: Preliminary experience, JAMA 251:1171–3 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NY Times (April 11, 1984), A16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Department of Health and Social Security: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology, London (July 1984).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Committee to Consider the Social, Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from In Vitro Fertilization: Report on the Disposition of Embryos Produced by In Vitro Fertilization, Melbourne (Aug. 1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. House of Representatives: Hearings on the Extracorporeal Embryo before the Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee of the Science and Technology Committee, August 8–9, 1984, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    People (March 5, 1984), 73.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grobstein, C., Flower, M., and Mendeloff, J., External human fertilization: An evaluation of policy, Science 222:127–133 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robertson, J. A., Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth, Virginia Law Rev. 69:405–464 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrews, L., New Conceptions ,St. Martins Press, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Annas, G. J., Fathers anonymous: Beyond the best interests of the sperm donor, Family Law Q. 14:1–13 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Annas, G. J., and Elias, S., In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: Medicolegal aspects of a new technique to create a family, Family Law Q. 17:199–223 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blumberg, G. G., Legal issues in nonsurgical human ovum transfer, JAMA 251:1178–81 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rowland, R., cited in Singer, P. and Wells, D., The Reproductive Revolution ,Oxford University Press, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Time (July 2, 1984), 68.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Callahan, S., Callahan, D., eds. Abortion: Understanding Differences. Plenum Press, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Annas, G. J., Life, liberty and pursuit of organ sales, Hastings Center Report 14:22–23 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy, I., Let the law take on test tube, London Times (May 26, 1984), 6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brahams, D., In-vitro fertilization and related research: Why parliament must legislate, Lancet 2:736–739 (1983).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wadlington, W., Artificial conception: The challenge for family law, Virginia Law Rev. 69:465–514 4 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Fertility Society, Ethical statement on in vitro fertilization, Fertility and Sterility 41:12 (1984).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Report of the RCOG ethics committee on in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement or transfer, London (March 1983).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fraser, F. C., and Forse, R. A., On genetic screening of donors for artificial insemination, Am. J. Genetics 10:399–405 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© George J. Annas Sherman Elias 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • George J. Annas
    • 1
  • Sherman Elias
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Boston University of Schools of Medicine and Public HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Genetics ServicesPrentice Women’s Hospital and Maternity CenterChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Northwestern University Medical SchoolChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations