Advertisement

Clinical Polygraphy

Its Function within Psychiatry
  • Brian E. Lynch
Part of the Critical Issues in American Psychiatry and the Law book series (CIAP, volume 2)

Abstract

Throughout history, humanity has been preoccupied, even obsessed, with truth and deception. We are a species of animal determined to uncover that which may not be as it seems. In recent times, this mission has resulted in the demise of many of our sacred institutions, even our high government offices. The need to know the truth has been the impetus behind development in areas such as science, medicine, psychiatry, and now clinical polygraphy. As we become increasingly reluctant to accept things at face value, we become more and more demanding of our assessment or investigative techniques. The demand for refinement of technique has been the driving force behind the development and progress of modern polygraphy.1

Keywords

Relevant Question Test Taker Control Question Innocent Person Polygraph Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lynch, BE: Detection of deception: Its application to forensic psychiatry. Bulletin of the A.A.P.L., 7(3):239–244, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynch, BE: The Psychophysiological Detection of Deception (PDD) and Psychiatry, in Forensic Psychiatry, S. Smith and J. Bradford (eds), in press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lykken, DT: A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orne, MT, Thackray, RI, Paskewitz, DA: On the detection of deception: A method for the study of the physiological effects of psychological stimuli, in N Greenfield & R Sternbach (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynch, BE: The polygraph; a psychiatric resource, Polygraph, 10(1):13–19, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barland, GH, Raskin, DC: Detection of deception, in WF Prokasy & DC Raskin (eds.), Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research. New York, Academic Press, 1973Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trovillo, PV: A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29(6):848–881, 1939, 30(1):104–119, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Podlesny, JA, Raskin, DC: Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4):782–799, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abrams, S: Polygraph Handbook far Attorneys. Lexington, Lexington Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, RC: Physiological responses as a means of evaluating information, in the Manipulation of Human Behavior, A Bidderman & H Zimmer (eds.), New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raskin, DC, Hare, RD: Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15(2):126–136, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ansley, N: A compendium on polygraph validity. Polygraph,12(2):53–61, 1983Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Markwart, A, Lynch, BE: The effect of polygraph evidence on mock jury decision-making, Journal of Police Science and Administration, 7(3):324–332, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Course Training Standard, Canadian Police College, Polygraph Training Section, Ottawa, Canada, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barland, GH: An introduction to the number test. Polygraph, 7(3):173–175, 1978Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lynch, BE, Bradford, JM: Amnesia: Its detection by psychophysiological measures. Bulletin of the A.A.P.L., 8(3):288–297, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lynch, BE, Waters, BG: A polygraphy examination of a sexually molested child. Polygraph, 9(3):143–147, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waters, BG, Lynch, BE: The polygraph as a facilitator in custody and access disputes and child welfare cases; unpublished manuscript, available from authors. Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K 1P 5117.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Polygraph Association, PO Box 74, Linthicum Heights, Maryland, 21090Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Canadian Association of Police Polygraphists, c/o Brian E. Lynch, MA, Canadian Police College, PO Box 8900, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 3J2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian E. Lynch
    • 1
  1. 1.Canadian Security Intelligence ServiceOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations