The origins of hypnosis are indisputably clinical, but its current acceptability and recognition stem largely from the high calibre of academic investment and the findings in experimental laboratories in recent years. What we know has been accumulated in the context of a rigorous adherence to finely developed research methods, constructive scepticism, and cold facts. Clinical results, on the other hand, demand flexibility, imaginative phrases, deep feelings, and even lofty thoughts. The poetry and the science are both essential for survival.
KeywordsInduction Procedure Altered Perception Unconscious Mind Heavy Path Demand Flexibility
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bohr, N., 1934, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, in: “Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature”, Cambridge, University Press, New York, Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A., 1924, Das Comptonsche Experiment, Berliner Tageblatt, Suppl. p. 1.Google Scholar
- Ellenberger, H. F., 1970, “The Discovery of the Unconscious,” Basic Books Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- Hilgard, E. R., 1965, “Hypnotic Susceptibility,” Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- Hilgard, J. R., 1970, “Personality and Hypnosis: A Study of Imaginative Involvement,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Lindemann, E., 1945, Symptomatology and management of acute grief, Am.J.Psychiat., 101:141.Google Scholar
- Mesmer, F. A., 1948, Mémoire sur la découverte du magnetisme animal, Geneva, 1774, With the Précis historique écrite par M. Paradise en mars 1777, Paris, Didot, 1779, English version: Mesmerism by Doctor Mesmer Dissertation on the discovery of animal magnetism, 1779. Translated by V.R. Myers, Published with G. Frankau, Introductory Monograph, London, MacDonald.Google Scholar
- Podmore, F., 1963, “From Mesmer to Christian Science: A Short History of Mental Healing,” University Books, New Hyde Park, New York.Google Scholar