Advertisement

Hypnosis — Both Poetry and Science

  • Fred H. Frankel

Abstract

The origins of hypnosis are indisputably clinical, but its current acceptability and recognition stem largely from the high calibre of academic investment and the findings in experimental laboratories in recent years. What we know has been accumulated in the context of a rigorous adherence to finely developed research methods, constructive scepticism, and cold facts. Clinical results, on the other hand, demand flexibility, imaginative phrases, deep feelings, and even lofty thoughts. The poetry and the science are both essential for survival.

Keywords

Induction Procedure Altered Perception Unconscious Mind Heavy Path Demand Flexibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohr, N., 1934, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, in: “Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature”, Cambridge, University Press, New York, Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  2. Einstein, A., 1924, Das Comptonsche Experiment, Berliner Tageblatt, Suppl. p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. Ellenberger, H. F., 1970, “The Discovery of the Unconscious,” Basic Books Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Frankel, F. H., Apfel, R. J., Kelly, S. F., Benson, H., Quinn, T., Newmark, J., and Malmaud, R., 1979, The use of hypnotizability scales in the clinic: A review after six years, Int.J.clin. exp.Hypnosis, 27:63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frankel, F. H., and Orne, M. T., 1976, Hypnotizability and phobic behavior, Archs.gen.Psychiat., 33:1259–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hilgard, E. R., 1965, “Hypnotic Susceptibility,” Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  7. Hilgard, J. R., 1970, “Personality and Hypnosis: A Study of Imaginative Involvement,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Lindemann, E., 1945, Symptomatology and management of acute grief, Am.J.Psychiat., 101:141.Google Scholar
  9. Mesmer, F. A., 1948, Mémoire sur la découverte du magnetisme animal, Geneva, 1774, With the Précis historique écrite par M. Paradise en mars 1777, Paris, Didot, 1779, English version: Mesmerism by Doctor Mesmer Dissertation on the discovery of animal magnetism, 1779. Translated by V.R. Myers, Published with G. Frankau, Introductory Monograph, London, MacDonald.Google Scholar
  10. O’Connell, D. N., Shor, R. E., and Orne, M. T., 1970, Hypnotic age regression: An empirical and methodological analysis, J.abnorm.Psychol., 76:(Monogr.Suppl. No. 3) 1–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orne, M. T., 1959, The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence, J.abnorm.soc.Psychol., 58:277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Podmore, F., 1963, “From Mesmer to Christian Science: A Short History of Mental Healing,” University Books, New Hyde Park, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Sacerdote, P., 1932, A non-statistical dissertation about hypnotizability scales and clinical goals: Comparison with individualized induction and deepening procedures, Int.J.clin.exp. Hypnosis., 30:354–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shor, R. E., 1962, Three dimensions of hypnotic depth, Int.J.clin. exp.Hypnosis., 10:23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stalnaker, J. M., and Riddle, E. E., 1932, The effect of hypnosis on long-delayed recall, J.gen.Psychol., 6:429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred H. Frankel
    • 1
  1. 1.Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations