Change in Subjective Experiences During Therapeutic Self-Hypnosis

  • R. Van Dyck
  • Ph. Spinhoven
  • J. Commandeur


Although imagery is a central element in many hypnotherapeutic and behavior modification procedures, relatively little is known about the process by which these imagery scenes operate.

This study is intended to identify some of the process variables that are relevant to the therapeutic outcome of hypnotic imagery. As the investigated procedure relies upon imagery alone, we are also interested in the occurrence of non-suggested changes on the cognitive level as related to the outcome of therapy.

The subjects were 5 phobic patients of low hypnotizability who were first trained in self-hypnosis and then were hypnotically reorientated towards an imaginary future scene at which their symptoms are to be alleviated. The patients were provided with a tape-recording of these sessions for further daily training at home.

Patients were asked to monitor several aspects of their practice sessions at home at at two points during the therapy period they were interviewed about their thoughts and experiences during the hypnotic imagery with the aid of a videotape of their hypnotherapy sessions.

A comparison of successful vs unsuccessful participants was carried out. Related to a successful outcome were the occurrence of self-initiated goal-directed fantasies as well as an unsuggested shift towards more rational cognitions about the phobia.


Subjective Experience Task Orientation Successful Patient Therapy Period Fear Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrindell, W. A., 1980, Dimensional structure and psychopathology correlates of the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS-IIII) in a phobic population: a factorial definition of agoraphobia, Behav.Res. Ther., 18:229–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diamond, M. J., 1974, Modification of Hypnotizability: a Review, Psychol.Bull., 81:180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyck, R. Van, 1980, An individualized procedure for learning therapeutic seIf-hypnosis. Paper presented at the 2nd European Congress of Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine, Dubrovnik, 12–18 May.Google Scholar
  4. Erickson, M. H., 1954, Pseudo-orientation in time as a hypnothera-peutic procedure, in: “Advanced Techniques of Hypnosis and Therapy: Selected Papers of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.,” J. Haley, ed., Grüne and Stratton, New York, 369–389.Google Scholar
  5. Fromm, E., Brown, D. P., Hurt, S. W., Oberknder, J. Z., Boxer, A. M., and Pfeifer, G., 1981, The phenomena and characteristics of self-hypnosis, Int.J.clin.exp.Hypnosis, 29:189–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hilgard, E. R., 1965, Hypnotic susceptibility, Harcourt Brace and World, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Hilgard, J. R., 1970, Personality and hypnosis: a study of imagin ative involvement, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Lazarus, A. A., 1973, ‘Hypnosis’ as a facilitator in behavior therapy, Int.J.clin.exp.Hypnosis, 21:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maultsby, M., 1975, Help yourself to happiness through rational self-counselling, Marlborough House Inc., Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Sachs, L. B., and Anderson, W. L., 1967, Modification of hypnotic susceptibility, Int.J.clin.exp.Hypnosis, 15:172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarbin, T. R., and Coe, W., 1972, Hypnosis: a social psychological analysis of influence communication, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Sheehan, P. W., 1979, Hypnosis and the process of imagination, in: “Hypnosis: Developments in Research and New Perspectives,” E. Fromm and R. E. Shor, eds., Aldine Publishing Company, New York, 381–411.Google Scholar
  13. Shor, R. E., 1959, Hypnosis and the concept of the generalized reality-orientation, Amer.J.Psychother., 13:582–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Singer, J. L., 1974, Imagery and daydream methods in psychotherapy and behavior modification, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Spanos, N. P., 1971, Goal-directed fantasy and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions, Psychiatry., 34:86–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Spiegel, H., and Speigel, D., 1978, Trance and treatment: clinical uses of hypnosis, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Spinhoven, Ph., and Commandeur, J., 1981, Illusie, van Fantasie tot Werkelijkheid, Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden.Google Scholar
  18. Van Nuys, D., 1973, Meditation, attention and hypnotic susceptibility: a correlational study, Int.J.clin.exp.Hypnosis, 21:59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., 1957, General Techniques of Hypnotism, Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Wolpe, J., 1958, Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  21. Wolpe, J., and Lang, P. J., 1964, A fear survey schedule for use in behavior therapy, Behav.Res.Ther., 2:27–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Van Dyck
    • 1
  • Ph. Spinhoven
    • 1
  • J. Commandeur
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeidenOegstgeestHolland

Personalised recommendations