Ergonomic Data for Console Design

  • William H. Cushman
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 25)


Console workplaces are suitable for many types of military and industrial jobs that involve monitoring a number of displays, making decisions based on information conveyed by the displays, and operating controls to carry out the decisions. Typical applications include air defense, air traffic control, nuclear power plant operations, industrial process control, and plant security.


Work Surface Side Panel Toggle Switch Push Button Human Engineer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous, 1981, Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities, MIL-STD-1472 c.Google Scholar
  2. Arora, S., 1976, Effect of magnitude, direction of hand-movement and plane angle on reach time, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting, Human Factors Association of Canada, 40.Google Scholar
  3. Ayoub, M. M., 1973, Work place design and posture, Human Factors, 15:265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoub, M. M., and Halcomb, C. G., 1976, Improved seat, console, and workplace design: Annotated bibliography, integration of the literature, accommodation model, and seated operator reach profiles, Pacific Missile Test Center, TP-76-1.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, R. M., 1958, “Motion and Time Study,” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chaffee, J. W., and Emanuel, A., 1964, Maximum arm reach on instrument racks from the seated position, Boeing Company Report D2-90549.Google Scholar
  7. Das, B., and Grady, R. M., 1981, Comparative analysis of the normal working area in the horizontal plane, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 762.Google Scholar
  8. Dempster, W. T., 1955, Space requirements of the seated operator, WADC-TR-55-159.Google Scholar
  9. Dempster, W. T., Gabel, W. C., and Felts, W. J. L., 1959, The anthropometry of the manual work space for the seated subject, Am. J. Physical Anthropology, 17:289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ely, J. H., Thomson, R. M., and Orlansky, J., 1956, Layout of workspaces, in: “Joint Services Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design,” WADC-TR-56-171.Google Scholar
  11. Farley, R. R., 1955, Some principles of methods and motion study as used in development work, General Motors Engineering Journal, 2:20.Google Scholar
  12. Grandjean, E., 1981, “Fitting the Task to the Man,” Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
  13. Kennedy, K. W., 1978, Reach capability of men and women: A three-dimensional analysis, AMRL-TR-77-50.Google Scholar
  14. Kennedy, K. W., 1964, Reach capability of the USAF population: Phase I. The outer boundaries of grasping-reach envelopes for the shirt-sleeved, seated operator, AMRL-TDR-64-59.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, K. W., and Bates, Jr., C., 1965, Development of design Standards for ground support consoles, AMRL-TR-65-163.Google Scholar
  16. Kobrick, J. L., 1965, Effects of physical location of visual stimuli on intentional response time, J. Eng. Psychol., 4:1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmann, G., and Stier, F., 1961, Mensch und Gerät, in: Handbuch der gesamten Arbeitsmedizin, Vol. I,” E. Baader, ed., Urban und Schwarzenberg, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Morgan, C. T., Cook, J. S., Chapanis, A., and Lund, M. W., 1963, “Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design,” McGraw-Hill, New York (N. Y.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roth, J. T., Ayoub, M. M., and Halcomb, C. G., 1977, Seating, console and workplace design: Seated operator reach profiles, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 83.Google Scholar
  20. Sharp, E. D., and Hornseth, J. P., 1965, The effects of control location upon performance time for knob, toggle switch, and push button, AMRL-TR-65-41.Google Scholar
  21. Siegel, A. I., and Brown, F. R., 1958, An experimental study of control console design, Ergonomics, 1:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Squires, P. C., 1956, The shape of the normal work area, U.S. Navy Medical Research Laboratory, Report No. 275, New London (Conn.).Google Scholar
  23. Stoudt, H. W., 1978, Arm-leg reach and workspace layout, in: “Anthropometric Source Book,” Vol. I, Webb Associates, ed., NASA Reference Publication, 1024.Google Scholar
  24. VanCott, H. P., and Kinkade, R. G., eds., 1972, “Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design,” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  25. Webb Associates, eds., 1978, “Anthropometric Source Book,” Vol.I; “Anthropometry for Designers,” Vol. II; “Handbook of Anthropometrie Data,” Vol. III; “Annotated Bibliography of Anthropometry,” NASA Reference Publication, 1024.Google Scholar
  26. Woodson, W. E., 1981, “Human Factors Design Handbook,” McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Cushman
    • 1
  1. 1.Eastman Kodak CompanyRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations