Some Limitations to Ergonomic Design

  • J. Moraal
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 25)


In coping with his environment man has to perform numerous and diversified tasks, be it at home, in his work or in recreational or social acitivities. Tasks vary from very simple to highly complex, in sort and amount of required experience and skills, like precision, speed and strength, and in whether or not tools or aids are used to enlarge human capabilities. These tools and aids - usually called “machines” - also vary from simple to highly complex, e.g. a spoon versus a space capsule. Tasks have to be performed efficiently, comfortably and safely, at least in the opinion of the ergonomist or human engineer. In order to meet these criteria, it is not very adequate to merely tell people how to behave because, although they may be well motivated, it mostly is not known what exactly efficient and safe behaviour is, how it should be defined and what kind of capabilities are required to behave accordingly.


Task Performance Traffic Light Sudden Stop Human Engineering Ergonomic Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chapanis, A., 1976, Engineering Psychology, in: “Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology,” Dunnette, ed., Rand McNally, New York (N. Y.).Google Scholar
  2. Chapanis, A., 1979, Quo Vadis, Ergonomia, Ergonomics, 22:595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Greene, K. B., 1980, Major Conceptual Problems in the Systems Management of Human Factors /Ergonomics Research, Ergonomics, 23:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, M., 1981, The Design of an Accident Investigation Procedure, Applied Ergonomics, 12:111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gazis, D., Herman, R., and Aradudin, A., 1960, The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow, Operations Research, 8:112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haslegrave, C. M., 1980, Anthropometric Profile of the British Car Driver, Ergonomics, 23:437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hutchinson, T.P., and Haslegrave, C. M., 1980, Determination of Patterns of Human Body Measurements by Use of Partial Correlations, Ergonomics, 23:475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knight, J. L., Geddes, L. A., and Salvendy, G., 1980, Continuous, unobtrusive, performance and physiological monitoring of industrial workers, Ergonomics, 23:501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Olson, P. L., and Rothery, R. W., 1972, Deceleration Levels and Clearance Times Associated with the Amber Phase of Traffic Signals, Traffic Engineering, 42:16, 42:63.Google Scholar
  10. Swain, A. D., and Guttmann, H.E., 1980, “Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications,” Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque (New Mexico).Google Scholar
  11. Wechsler, D., 1952, “Range of Human Capacities,” Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  12. Zegeer, C. V., and Deen, R. C., 1978, Green-Extension Systems at High-Speed Intersections, ITE Journal, 11:19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Moraal
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Perception TNOSoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations