Advertisement

Task Analysis in System Ergonomics

  • Heiner Bubb
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 25)

Abstract

In the preceding paper it has been more generally shown, how system ergonomics is especially concerned with the development of ergonomic analysis and design methods and their application to the solution of man-machine-system problems which arise during system design. The steps have been pointed out, through which a system ergonomic application has to run (development phase, realisation phase and finally operation phase) and it has been demonstrated that various disciplines have to contribute to system ergonomics. Moreover different solution proposals are generated by system ergonomics. It should also be a task of this discipline to select the best solution by the cost criterion. Assuming that system performance requirements and system function have already been determined, the “function allocation” distributes system functions to personal and machine elements.

Keywords

Task Analysis Force Function Control Element Sequential Operation Structure Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernotat, R., 1964, Der Mensch als Element des Flugführungssystems, Luftfahrt-Raumfahrttechnik, 10:66.Google Scholar
  2. Bubb, H., 1981, The Influence of Braking Distance Indication on the Driver’s Behaviour, in: “Human Factors in Transport Research,” D. J. Oborne, and J. A. Levis, eds.Google Scholar
  3. Bubb, P., 1978, Untersuchung über den Einfluß stochastischer Rollschwingungen auf die Steuerleistung des Menschen bei Regelstrecken unterschiedlichen Ordnungsgrades, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
  4. Carboneil, J. R., 1966, A Queueing Model of Many-Instrument Visual Sampling, IEEE Trans. Human Factors in Electronic, HEE-7:157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crossman, E. R. F. W., and Szostak, H., 1969, Man-Machine-Models for Car-Steering, Forth Annual NASA-University Conference on Manual Control, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, E., 1976, Some Aspects, of Automation in Civil Transport Aircraft, in “Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control,” T. B. Sheridan, and G. Johannsen, eds., Plenum, New York (N. Y.).Google Scholar
  7. Elkind, J. I., 1956, Characteristics of Simple Manual Control Systems, Technical Report 111, MIT, Lexington (Mass.).Google Scholar
  8. Elkind, J. I., 1964, A Survey of the Development of Models for the Human Controller, in: “Guidance and Control II,” R. C. Longford, ed., Academic Press, New York (N. Y.).Google Scholar
  9. Fiala, E., 1966, Lenken von Fahrzeugen als kybernetische Aufgabe, Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, 68:156.Google Scholar
  10. Gnedenkow, B. W., and Kovalenko, I. N., 1971, “Einführung in die Bedienungstheorie,” Oldenbourg, München.Google Scholar
  11. Hilf, H., 1976, “Einführung in die Arbeitswissenschaft,” de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Johannsen, G., 1965, Geschehenswahrnehmung, in: “Handbuch der Psychologie,” W. Metzger, ed., Hograefe, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  13. Kelley, C. R., 1968, “Manual and Automatic Control,” Wiley, New York (N. Y.).Google Scholar
  14. Krampe, H., Kubat, J., and Runge, W., 1973, “Bedienungsmodelle. Ein Leitfaden für die praktische Anwendung,” Oldenbourg, München, Wien.Google Scholar
  15. McLean, J. F., and Hoffmann, E. R., 1973, The Effects of Restrict of Preview on Driver Steering Control and Performance, Human Factors, 15:421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McRuer, D. T., Jex, H. R., Clement, W. F., and Graham, D., 1967, Development of a Systems Analysis Theory of Manual Control Displays, System Technology Inc., Report No. TR-163-1.Google Scholar
  17. McRuer, D. T., and Krendel, E. S., 1957, Dynamic Response of Human Operators, WADC TR-56-524, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton (Ohio).Google Scholar
  18. Naish, J. M., 1964, Combination of Information of Superimposed Visual Fields, Nature, 202:641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naish, J. M., 1970, Control Gains in Head-Up Presentation, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Manual Control, Dayton (Ohio).Google Scholar
  20. Poulton, E. C., 1964, Postpreview and Preview in Tracking with Complex and Simple Inputs, Ergonomics, 7:257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poulton, E. C., 1966, Tracking, in: “Acquisition of Skill,” E. A. Bilodeau, ed., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  22. Poulton, E. C., 1974, “Tracking Skill and Manual Control,” Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London.Google Scholar
  23. Rühmann, H. P., 1978, Untersuchung über den Einfluß der mechanischen Eigenschaften von Bedienungselementen auf die Steuerleistung des Menschen bei stochastischen Rollschwingungen, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
  24. Schmidtke, H., 1976, “Ergonomische Bewertung von Arbeitssystemen. Entwurf eines Verfahrens,” Hanser, München, Wien.Google Scholar
  25. Schulze, B. G., 1981, Application of Ergonomic Principles in Driving Control Design, in: “Human Factors in Transport Research,” D.J. Oborne, and J. A. Levis, eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  26. Schumacher, W., 1976, Untersuchung der Strategien des Menschen bei der Bedienung mehrerer Anforderungen, Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben T/RF 36/RF 360/410, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heiner Bubb
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Ergonomie der Technischen UniversitätMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations