Advertisement

Some Growth Points in Investigative Plant Ecology

  • Peter J. Grubb
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 7)

Abstract

There are abundant opportunities for progress in the following fields: (1) maintenance of species richness, particularly in characterizing the factors which chiefly control the population sizes of co-existing species and in determining the extent to which sparse species in any given community have an appreciable impact on each other; (2) the relative importance of shoot and root. mediated interference between plants, and the involvement of various mechanisms of root mediated interference, in the control of relative abundance and primary and secondary dominance and in the exclusion of species from particular communities; and (3) leaf form and function, particularly in understanding the evolution of maximum rates of net assimilation in different kinds of plants and of various structural characteristics possibly related to intra-leaf hydraulic conductance. In general, much more long term research is needed in all aspects of ecology. Plant ecologists still have a great deal to learn from animal ecologists, and more should be done to make the two groups aware of each other’s ideas.

Keywords

Stomatal Density Growth Point Leaf Nitrogen Concentration Regeneration Niche Evergreen Conifer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Andrewartha, H.C., and L.C. Birch. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL USA.Google Scholar
  2. Bornkamm, R., 1961. Zur Konkurrenzkraft von Bromus erectus. Bot. Jahrb. 80: 466–479.Google Scholar
  3. Caswell, E., 1978. Predator mediated coexistence: a non-equilibrium model. Am. Nat. 112: 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cernusca, A., 1977. Bestandesstruktur, Mikroklima und Energiehaushalt von Pflanzenbeständen des alpinen Grasheidegürtels in den Hohen Tauern. Erste Ergebnisse der Projekstudie 1976. Pages 25–45 inA. Cernusca, ed. Veröffentlichungen des Österreichischen MaB Hochgebirgsprogrammes Hohe Tauern, vol. I. Alpine Grasheide Hohes Tauern. Wagner, Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar
  5. Christie, P., E.I. Newman, and R. Campbell., 1978. The influence of neighbouring grassland plants on each others’ endomycorrhizas and root-surface microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 521–527.Google Scholar
  6. Cowan, I.R., and G.D. Farquhar., 1977. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Pages 471–505 in D.H. Jennings, ed. Integration of activity in the higher plant. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symp. 31. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  7. Eagles, C.F., 1972. Competition for light and nutrients between natural populations of Dactylis glomerate. J. Appl. Ecol. 9: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eagles, C.F., and D.H. Williams., 1971. Competition between naturalGoogle Scholar
  9. populations of Dactylis glomerate. J. Agric. Sci. 77:187–193.Google Scholar
  10. Ellenberg, H., 1963. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart, W. Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Ellenberg, H., 1982. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 3rd ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart, W. Germany.Google Scholar
  12. Fenner, M., 1978. A comparison of the abilities of colonizers and closed-turf species to establish from seed in artificial swards. J. Ecol. 66: 953–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fowler, N., 1982. Competition and coexistence in a North Carolina grassland. III. Mixtures of component species. J. Ecol. 70: 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galoux, A., P. Benecke, G. Gietl, H. Hager, C. Kayser, O. Kiese, K.R. Knoerr, C.E. Murphy, G. Schnock, and T.R. Sinclair., 1981. Radiation, heat, water and carbon dioxide balances. Pages 87–204 inD.E. Reichle, ed. Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  15. Gay, P.E., P.J. Grubb, and H.J. Hudson., 1982. Seasonal changes in the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and in the density of mycorrhiza, in biennial and matrix-forming perennial species of closed chalkland turf. J. Ecol. 70: 571–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Givnish, T.J., 1979. On the adaptive significance of leaf form. Pages 375–407 in O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson, and P.H. Raven, eds. Topics in plant population biology. Macmillan, London, England.Google Scholar
  17. Grime, J.P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  18. Grubb, P.J., 1977a. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52: 107–145.Google Scholar
  19. Grubb, P.J., 1977b. Leaf structure and function. Pages 317–329 in R. Duncan and M. Weston-Smith, eds. An encyclopedia of ignorance. Vol. 2, Biological sciences. Pergamon, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  20. Grubb, P.J., 1982. Control of relative abundance in roadside Arrhenatheretum: results of a long-term garden experiment. J. Ecol. 70: 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grubb, P.J., D. Kelly, and J. Mitchley., 1982. The control of relative abundance in communities of herbaceous plants. Pages79–97 in E.I. Newman, ed. The plant community as a working mechanism. Spec. Publ. Ser. Br. Ecol. Soc. 1. Blackwell, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  22. Harper, J.L., 1961. Approaches to the study of plant competition. Pages 1–39 in F.L. Miithorpe, ed. Mechanisms in biological competition. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symp. 15. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  23. Harper, J.L., 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, England.Google Scholar
  24. Haynes, R.J., 1980. Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv. Agron. 33: 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, D., 1982. Demography, population control and stability in short-lived plants of chalk grassland. Ph.D. Dissert., Univ. of Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  26. Kershaw, T.J., 1982. Some suggestions for practical work. Pages 147–167 in W.J. Davies and P.G. Ayres, eds. Biology in the 80s: Plant physiology. Univ. of Lancaster, Lancaster, England.Google Scholar
  27. Kira, T., 1975. Primary production of forests. Pages 5–40 in J.P. Cooper, ed. Photosynthesis and primary productivity in different environments. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  28. Körner, C., J.A. Scheel, and H. Bauer., 1979. Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13: 45–82.Google Scholar
  29. Lieth, H., 1960. Patterns of change within grassland communities. Pages 27–39 in J.L. Harper, ed. The biology of weeds. Br. Ecol. Soc. Symp. 1. Blackwell, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  30. Loucks, O.L., A.R. Ek, W.C. Johnson, and R.A. Monserud., 1981. Growth, aging and succession. Pages 37–85 in D.E. Reichle, ed. Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  31. Lubchenco, J., 1980. Algal zonation in the New England rocky intertidal community: an experimental analysis. Ecology 61: 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGilchrist, C.A., and B.R. Trenbath., 1971. A revised analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics 27: 659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, P.C., and W.A. Stoner., 1979. Canopy structure and environ- mental interactions. Pages 428–448 in Q.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson, and P.H. Raven, eds. Topics in plant population biology. Macmillan, London, England.Google Scholar
  34. Mooney, H.A. C. Field, S.L. Gulmon, and F.A. Bazzaz., 1981. Photosynthetic capacity in relation to leaf position in desert versus old-field annuals. Oecologia 50: 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mooney, H.A., and S.L. Gulmon., 1982. Constraints on leaf structure and function in reference to herbivory. Bioscience 32: 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman, E.I. 1973. Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegeta-tion. Nature 244: 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman, E.I., and A.D. Rovira., 1975. Allelopathy among some British grassland plants. J. Ecol. 63: 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noble, I.R., 1980. Interactions between tussock grass (Poaspp.) and Eucalyptus paucifloraseedlings near the treeline in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia 45: 350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orians, G.H., and O.T. Solbrig., 1977. A cost-income model of leaves and roots with special reference to arid and semi-arid areas. Am. Nat. 111: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osmond, C.B., 1983. Interactions between irradiance, nitrogen -nutrition, and water stress in the sun-shade responses of Solanum dulcamara. Oecologia 57: 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pigott, C.D., 1982. The experimental study of vegetation. New Phytol. 90: 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabinowitz, D., 1981. Seven forms of rarity. Pages 205–217 inH. Synge, ed. The biology of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  43. Schonbeck, M., and T.A. Norton., 1978. Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31: 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sherriff, D.W., and H. Meidner., 1974. Water pathways in leaves of Hedera helixL. and Tradescantia virginianaL. J. Exp. Bot. 25: 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sherriff, D.W., and H. Meidner., 1975. Water movement into and through Tradescantia virginiana (L.) leaves. I. Uptake during conditions of dynamic equilibrium. J. Exp. Bot. 26: 897–902.Google Scholar
  46. Silander, J., and J. Antonovics., 1982. Analysis of interspecific interactions in a coastal plain community a perturbation approach. Nature 298: 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Small, E., 1972. Photosynthetic rates in relation to nitrogen cycling as an adaptation to nutrient deficiency in peat bog plants. Can. J. Bot. 50: 2227–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Specht, R.L., 1972. The vegetation of South Australia, 2nd ed. Gov. Print., Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
  49. Tanner, E.V.J., 1977. Four montane rain forests of Jamaica: a. quantitative characterization of the floristics, the soils and the foliar mineral levels, and a discussion of the interrelations. J. Ecol. 65: 883–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tanner, E.V.J., 1982. Species diversity and reproductive mechanisms in Jamaican trees. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 18: 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, P.E., 1982. The development and ecological significance of mycorrhiza in contrasted groups of chalk grassland plants. Ph.D. Dissert., Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, R.A.J., and L.R. Taylor., 1979. A behavioural model for the evolution of spatial dynamics. Pages 1–27 inR.M. Anderson, B.D. Turner, and L.R. Taylor, eds. Population dynamics. Br. Ecol. Soc. Symp. 20. Blackwell., Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  53. Turkington, R., and J.L. Harper., 1979. The growth, distribution and neighbour relationships of TrifoIium repens in a permanent pasture. IV. Fine-scale biotic differentiation. J. Ecol. 67:245–254.Google Scholar
  54. Varley, G.C., 1949. Population changes in German forest pests. J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker, B.H., D. Ludwig, C.S. Rolling, and R.M. Peterman., 1981. Stability in semi-arid savanna grazing systems. J. Ecol. 69: 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walker, J., R.M. Moore, and J.A. Robertson., 1971. Herbage response to tree and shrub thinning in Eucalyptus populneashrub woodlands. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walter, H., 1973. Ecology of tropical and subtropical vegetation. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  58. Wardle, P., 1959. The regeneration of Fraxinus excelsiorin woods with a field layer of Mercurialis perennis. J. Ecol. 47: 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weaver, J. E., and F.E. Clements., 1929. Plant ecology. McGraw-Hill,New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  60. Wells, P.V., 1965. Scarp woodlands, transported grassland soils, and concept of grassland climate in the Great Plains region. Science 148: 246–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Grubb
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany SchoolCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations