Towards a Landscape Ecology of River Valleys

  • Henri Décamps
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 7)


The interest given to detritus in streams of allochthonous origin dates back almost half a century (Thienemann 1912, Jewell 1927), as pointed out by Hynes (1970). Numerous studies have been devoted to this theme, particularly during the seventies, when a multitude of articles concerning the role of dead leaves in the functioning of water courses was published. Hence, there evolved a more holistic concept of lotic ecosystems.


River Valley Particulate Organic Matter Landscape Ecology Riparian Vegetation Stream Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Amoros, C., M. Richardot-Coulet, J.L. Reygrobellet, G. Pautou, J.P. Bravard, and A.L. Roux. 1982. Cartographie polythématique appliquée à la gestion écologique des eaux; étude d’un hydrosystème fluvial: le Haut-Rhône francais. Cent. Natl. Res. Sci., Paris, France.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N.H., and J.R. Sedell. 1979. Detritus processing by macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24:351–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bärlocher, F., and B. Kendrick. 1981. The role of aquatic hyphomycetes in the trophic structure of streams. In D.T. Wicklow and G.C. Caroll, eds. The fungal community, its organization and role in the ecosystem. Marcel Dekkes, New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  4. Binder, W., P. Jürging, and J. Karl. 1983. Natural river engineering-characteristics and limitations. Garten + Landschaft 2:91–94.Google Scholar
  5. Bird, G.A., and N.K. Kaushik. 1981. Coarse particulate organic matter in streams. Pages 41–68 in M.A. Lock and D.D. Williams, eds. Perspectives in running water ecology. Plenum, New York, NY USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boling, R.H., Jr., E.D. Goodman, J.A. Van Sickle, J.O. Zimmer, K.W. Cummins, R.C. Petersen, and S.R. Reice. 1974. Toward a model of detritus processing in a woodland stream. Ecology 56:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkham, D.E. 1976. Hydraulic effects of changes in bottomland vegetation on three major floods, Gila River in southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 665-J:1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Capblancq, J., and H. Décamps. 1978. Dynamics of the phytoplankton in the river Lot. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 20:1479–1484.Google Scholar
  9. Carbiener, R. 1978. Un exemple de prairie hygrophile primaire juvénile: l’Oenantho Lachenalii Molinictum de la zonation d’atterrissement rhénane résultant des endiguements du 19è siècle en moyenne Alsace. Pages 13–42 in J.M. Gehu, ed. La végétation des praires inondables. Cramer, Lille, France.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, K.W. 1974. Structure and function of stream ecosytems. Bioscience 24: 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, K.W. 1979. The natural stream ecosystem. Pages 7–24 in J.V. Ward and J.A. Stanford, eds. The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum, New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  12. Dance, K.W. 1981. Seasonal aspects of transport of organic and inorganic matter in streams. Pages 69–95 in M.A. Lock and D.D. Williams, eds. Perspectives in running water ecology. Plenum, New York, NY USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dasman, R.F., J.P. Milton, and P.H. Freeman. 1974. Ecological principles for economic development. Wiley, London, England.Google Scholar
  14. Dawson, F.H. 1976. Organic contribution of stream edge forest litter fall to the chalk stream ecosystem. Oikos 27:13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Décamps, H. 1984, in press. Biology of regulated rivers in France. In A. Lillehammer and S.J. Saltveit, eds. Regulated streams. 2nd Int. Symp., Oslo, Norway. Univ. of Oslo Press.Google Scholar
  16. Décamps, H., J. Capblancq, H. Casanova, A. Dauta, H. Laville, and J.N. Tourenq. 1981. Ecologie des rivières et développement: l’expérience d’aménagement de la vallée du Lot. Pages 219–234 in J.C. Lefeuvre, G. Long, and G. Ricou, eds. Ecologie et développement. Cent. Natl. Res. Sci., Paris, France.Google Scholar
  17. Décamps, H., J. Capblancq, H. Casanova, and J.N. Tourenq. 1979. Hydrobiology of some regulated rivers in the southwest of France. Pages 273–288 in J.V. Ward and J.A. Stanford, eds. The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum,, New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  18. Décamps, H., and T. Casanova-Batut. 1978. Les matières en suspension et la turbidité de l’eau dans la rivière Lot. Ann. Limnol. 14:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Décamps, H., J.C. Massio, and J.C. Darcos. 1976. Variations des teneurs en matières minérales et organiques transportées dans une rivière canalisée, le Lot. Ann. Limnol. 12:215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drake, C.M., and J.M. Elliott. 1982. A comparative study of three air-lift samplers used for sampling benthic macro-invertebrates in rivers. Freshwater Biol. 12:511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, J.M., and C.M. Drake. 1981a. A comparative study of seven grabs used for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in rivers. Freshwater Biol. 11:99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliott, J.M., and C.M. Drake. 1981b. A comparative study of four dredges used for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in rivers. Freshwater Biol. 11:245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Everitt, B.L. 1980. Ecology of saltcedar. A plea for research. Environ. Geol. 3: 77–84.Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, S.G. 1977. Organic matter processing by a stream-segment ecosystem: Fort River, Massachusetts, U.S.A. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 62:701–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, S.G., and G.E. Likens. 1972. Stream ecosystem: Organic energy budget. Bioscience 22:33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher, S.G., and G.E. Likens. 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecol. Monogr. 43:421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fittkau, E.J. 1964. Remarks on limnology of Central-Amazon rainforest streams. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 15:1092–1096.Google Scholar
  28. Fontaine, T.D., and S.M. Bartell, eds. 1983. Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sci., Ann Arbor, MI USA.Google Scholar
  29. Forman, R.T.T. 1984, in press. Corridors in a landscape: Their ecological structure and function. Ekologia (CSSR).Google Scholar
  30. Forman, R.T.T., and M. Godron. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31:733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gelroth, J.V., and G.R. Marzolf. 1978. Primary production and leaf litter decomposition in natural and channelized portions of a Kansas stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 99:238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Golterman, H.L. 1982. La géochimie du Rhin et du Rhône et l’impact humain. Hydrobiologia 91:85–91.Google Scholar
  33. Golubev, G.N., and A.K. Biswas. 1979. Interregional water transfers: Projects and problems. Water Supply Manage. 2:59–211.Google Scholar
  34. Gosz, J.R., G.E. Likens, and F.H. Bormann. 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecol. Monogr. 43:173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horton, J.S., and C.J. Campbell. 1974. Management of phreatophyte and riparian vegetation for maximum multiple use values. U.S. Dep. of Agric. For. Serv. Res. Pap. RM-117:1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Huet, M. 1949. Apercu des relations entre la pente et les populations piscicoles des eaux courantes. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 11:333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hynes, H.B.N. 1963. Imported organic matter and secondary productivity in streams. Int. Congr. Zool. 16:324–329.Google Scholar
  38. Hynes, H.B.N. 1970. The ecology of running waters. Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  39. Hynes, H.B.N. 1975. The stream and its valley. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 19:1–15.Google Scholar
  40. Illies, J., and L. Botosaneanu. 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de las classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considérées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitt. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 12:1–57.Google Scholar
  41. Jewell, M.E. 1927. Aquatic biology of the prairie. Ecology 7:289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karr, J.R., and I.J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land water interface. Science 201:229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaushik, N.K., and H.B.N. Hynes. 1971. The fate of the dead leaves that fall into streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 68:465–515.Google Scholar
  44. Le Cren, E.D., and R.H. Lowe-McConnell. 1980. The functioning of freshwater ecosystems. IBP 22. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  45. Likens, G.E., ed. 1981. Flux of organic carbon by rivers to the oceans. U. S. Dep. of Energy CONF - 8009140, Nat. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, VA USA.Google Scholar
  46. Lillehammer, A., and S.J. Saltveit, eds. 1984, in press. Regulated streams. 2nd Int. Symp., Oslo, Norway. Univ. of Oslo Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lock, M.A., and D.D. Williams, eds. 1981. Perspectives in running water ecology. Plenum, New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  48. Macan, T.T. 1974. Running water. Mitt. Int. Ver. Limnol. 20:301–321.Google Scholar
  49. Mathews, C.P., and A. Kowalczewsky. 1969. The disappearance of leaf litter and its contribution to production in the River Thames. J. Ecol. 57:543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Melillo, J.M., R.J. Naiman, J.D. Aber, and K.N. Eshelman. 1983. The influence of substrate quality and stream size on wood decomposition dynamics. Oecologia 58:281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meybeck, M. 1982. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus transport by world rivers. Am. J. Sci. 282:401–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minshall, G.W. 1967. Role of allochtonous detritus in the trophic structure of a woodland spring brook community. Ecology 48:139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mitsch, W.J., C.L. Dorge, and J.R. Wiemhoff. 1979. Ecosystem dynamics and a phosphorus budget of an alluvial cypress swamp in southern Illinois. Ecology 60:1116–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Owens, M., J.H.N. Garland, I.C. Hart, and G. Wood. 1972. Nutrient budgets in rivers. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 29:21–40.Google Scholar
  55. Pautou, G., and J.P. Bravard. 1982. L’incidence des activités humaines sur la dynamique de l’eau et l’évolution de la végétation dans la vallée du Haut-Rhône francais. Rev. Geogr. Lyon 57:63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pautou, G., J. Girel, B. Lachet, and G. Ain. 1979. Recherches écologiques dans la vallée du Haut-Rhône francais. Doc. Cartogr. Ecol. 22:1–63.Google Scholar
  57. Rzoska, J. 1978. On the nature of rivers. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  58. Scheurmann, K. 1983. The design of river and stream beds. Garten + Landschaft 2:94–98.Google Scholar
  59. Schlosser, I.J., and J.R. Karr. 1981. Water quality in agricultural watersheds: Impact of riparian vegetation during base flow. Water Res. Bull. 17:233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thienemann, A. 1912. Der Bergbach des Sauerland. Int. Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. Suppl. 4:1–125.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, R.M. 1974. Quantitative and historical evidence of vegetation changes along the Upper Gila River, Arizona. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 655-H:1–20.Google Scholar
  62. Ulehlova, B., E. Klimo, and J. Jakrlova. 1976. Mineral cycling in alluvial forest and meadow ecosystems in southern Moravia, Czechoslovakia. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2:15–25.Google Scholar
  63. Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedel, and C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wallace, J.B., J.R. Webster, and W.R. Woodal. 1977. The role of filter feeders in flowing waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 79:506–532.Google Scholar
  65. Ward, J.V., and J.A. Stanford, eds. 1979. The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum, New York, NY USA.Google Scholar
  66. Ward, J.V., and J.A. Stanford. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. Pages 29–42 in T.D. Fontaine and S.M. Bartell, eds. Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Sci., Ann Arbor, MI USA.Google Scholar
  67. Warren, D.K., and R.M. Turner. 1975. Saltcedar seed production, seedling establishment, and response to inundation. J. Ariz. Acad. Sci. 10:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Webster, J.R., and B.C. Patten. 1979. Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 49:51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whitton, B.A., ed. 1984, in press. Ecology of European rivers. Blackwell, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  70. Yon, D., and G. Tendron. 1980. Etude sur les forêts alluviales en Europe, éléments du patrimoine naturel international. Rap. Cons. Eur. 65782:1–68.Google Scholar
  71. Young, S.A., W.P. Kovalak, and K.A. Del Signore. 1978. Distance travelled by autumn-shed leaves introduced into a woodland stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 100:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhadin, V.I., and S.V. Gerd. 1963. Fauna and flora of the rivers, lakes and reservoirs of the U.S.S.R. Israel Prog. Sci. Transl., Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henri Décamps
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre d’Écologie des Ressources RenouvelablesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations