Advertisement

A Two Pore Size Distribution Model for Transcapillary Exchange of Substances

  • Isaac I. H. Chen
  • John N. Diana
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 180)

Abstract

Net transcapillary fluid exchange results from an imbalance between the hydrostatic and osmotic forces acting across the microvascular exchange barrier. Net solute exchange results primarily as a passive phenomena in response to a concentration gradient across the microvasculature. Morphological (12)(13) as well as physiological (3)(4) measurements support the notion that the endothelial barrier of the microvasculature, through which such exchange must occur, is structurally heterogeneous. Several pathways for fluid and solute exchange have been proposed which include; direct passage through the endothelial plasma membranes (and intervening cytosol), a “pore” which is formed by the fusion of vesicles which creates a large channel through the endothelial cell; and, the pathway between the endothelial cells at the endothelial cell junctions. The latter have generally been considered the morphological counterpart of the “small-pore” and “large-pore” systems, while the first two pathways are considered to contribute minimally (10–15%) to overall blood to tissue transport of fluid and solutes. The initial attempt, made by Pappenheimer, Renkin and Borrero (11), was to characterize the movement of fluid and solute with a single, small-pore pathway model.

Keywords

Reflection Coefficient Volume Flux Pore Type Endothelial Plasma Membrane Molecular Radius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blake, L. and N. Staub. Pulmonary vascular transport in sheep: a mathematical model. Microvas. Res. 3:235–251, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curry, F. E. and C.C. Michel. A fiber matrix model of capillary permeability. Microvasc. Res. 20:96–99, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granger, D. N. and A.E. Taylor. Perselectivity of intestinal capillaries. Physiologist. 23:47–52, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granger, D. N. and A.E. Taylor. Permeability of intestinal capillaries to endogeneous macromolecules. Am. J. Physiol. 238:H457-H464, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groome, L. J., G.T. Kinasewitz and J.N. Diana. Diffusion and convection equation. In press 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grotte, G. Passage of dextran molecules across the blood-lymph barrier. Acta Chir. Scand. 211:1–84, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris, T. R. and R.J. Roselli. A theoretical model of protein fluid and smaller molecule transport in the lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 50:1–14, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kedem, O. and A. Katchalsky. A physical interpretation of the phenomenological coefficients of membrane permeability. J. Gen. Physiol. 45:143–179, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayerson, H. S., C. D. Walfram, H.H. Shirley and K. Wasserman. Regional difference in capillary permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 198:155–160, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paine, P. L. and P. Scherr. Drag coefficients for the movement of rigid sheres through liquid filled cylindrical pores. Biophys. J. 15:1087–1091, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pappenheimer, J. R., E. M. Renkin and L. M. Borrero. Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through peripheral capillary membranes: a contribution to the pore theory of capillary permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 167–13–46, 1951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perl, W., Modified filtration-permeability model of transcap-illary transport: a solution of the Pappenheimer Pore Puzzle? Microvasc. Res. 3:235–251, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Renkin, E. M. and F. E. Curry. Transport of water and solutes across capillary endothelium. In Handbook of Epithelial Transport, eduted by G. Giebisch, D. C. Tosteson, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaac I. H. Chen
    • 1
  • John N. Diana
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine in ShreveportLouisiana State UniversityShreveportUSA

Personalised recommendations