Elimination of Cyclophosphamide-Induced SCE in Lymphocytes of Rats with Time Post-Treatment

  • Armin Basler


Rats were treated intraperitoneally (ip) with 13.3 mg cyclo phosphamide (CP)/kg. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture 6,24,48,72 hr, 5 da and 14 da after treatment. The spontaneous sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency (9.94 SCEs/cell) was 4-fold increased (40.49 SCE/cell) in lymphocyte cultures set up 24 hr, after the CP treatment. Within the next 24 hr the SCE frequency began to decline and by 2 wk post-treatment the SCE values were within the control range. The results indicate that the elimination of damage to DNA by existing repair mechanisms is responsible for the reduction of SCEs with time, in addition to lymphocyte turnover.


Cardiac Puncture Lymphocyte Culture Genetic Damage Control Range Cytostatic Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Basler, A. (1982) SCEs in lymphocytes of rats after exposure in vivo to cigarette smoke or to cyclosphosphamide. Mutat. Res .102:137–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebhart, E., B. Windolph, and F. Wopfner (1980) Chromosome studies on lymphocytes of patients under cytostatic therapy. Human Genet. 56:157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huff, V., R.J. Du Frain, and L.G. Littlefield (1982) SCE fre quencies in rabbit lymphocytes as a function of time after an acute dose of cyclophosphamide. Mutat. Res. 94:349–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musilova, J., K. Michalová, and J. Urban (1979) Sister-Chromatid exchanges and chromosomal breakage in patients treated with cytostatics. Mutat. Res. 67:289–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohtsuru, M., Y. Ishii, S. Takai, H. Higashi, and G. Kosaki (1980) Sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of cancer patients receiving mitomycin C treatment. Cancer Res. 40:477–480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raposa, T. (1978) Sister chromatid exchange studies for monitoring DNA damage and repair capacity after cytostatics in vitro and in lymphocytes of leukaemic patients under cytostatic therapy. Mutat. Res. 57:241–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson, S.H., G. Brecher, I.S. Lourie, and J.E. Haley (1965) Leukocyte labeling in rats during and after continuous infusion of tritiated thymidine: Implications for lymphocyte longevity and DNA reutilization. Blood 26:281–295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Röpke, C, and N.B. Everett (1973) Small lymphocyte populations in the mouse bone marrow. Cell Tissue Kinet. 6:499–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stetka, D.G., and S. Wolff (1976) Sister-chromatid exchange as an assay for genetic damage induced by mutagen-clastogens. Mutat. Res. 41:333–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stetka, D.G., J. Minkler, and A.V. Carrano (1978) Induction of long-lived chromosome damage, as manifested by sister-chromatid exchange, in lymphocytes of animals exposed to Mitomycin C. Mutat. Res. 51:383–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trepel, F. (1975) Kinetik lymphatischer Zellen. In Lymphozyt und klinische Immunologie, Theml. H., and H. Begemann, eds. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trepel, F. (1976) Das lymphatische Zellsytem. In Hdb. Inn. Med. Bd 2, Teil 3, Begemann, H., ed. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 1–191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armin Basler
    • 1
  1. 1.Bundesgesundheitsamt, C V 2Max von Pettenkofer-InstitutBerlin 33Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations