Advertisement

Development of Rodent Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Culture Systems to Detect Cytogenetic Damage In Vivo

  • A. D. Kligerman
  • G. L. Erexson
  • J. L. Wilmer

Abstract

Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) offer many advantages for in vivo cytogenetic studies. They can be removed nonlethally from the animal allowing a subject to serve as its own control, permit ting the analysis of cytogenetic damage over time. Furthermore, mature PBLs normally do not divide, and some populations are long-lived. Thus, they have the potential to accumulate DNA lesions during chronic exposures to genotoxicants. We have developed standard methodologies for the whole blood culture of rat and mouse PBLs to serve as models for determining the sensitivity of PBLs to cytogenetic damage. The cultures obtained with these protocols give reproducible results with high mitotic indices, stable baseline sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies, and ample numbers of first-and second-division methaphases for scoring both chromosomal aberrations and SCEs. The methodologies have been especially useful for examining cytogenetic damage after inhalation exposures to toxicants such as ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, benzene, and nitrobenzene. Of these compounds, only benzene and ethylene oxide were found to induce significant dose-dependent increases in SCEs in PBLs. Also, dose-response curves have been obtained for several carcinogens administered by ip injection. These studies show that PBLs are sensitive indicators of the genotoxic effects of the carcinogens benzo(a)pyrene, 2-acetylaminofluorene, cyclophosphamide (CP), N-nitrosomorpholine, and ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS). In addition, because subpopulations of lymphocytes can be stimulated to divide using different mitogens, it has been possible to compare the sensitivity of murine B and T lymphocytes following in vitro and in vivo cyclophosphamide exposure. Once the sensitivity and selectivity of rodent lymphocyte cultures are determined, these assays should be valuable not only as a means for predicting which environmental agents could lead to increases in human cytogenetic damage, but also as a way to corroborate human cytogenetic studies.

Keywords

Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Mitotic Index Ethylene Oxide Sister Chromatid Exchange Lymphocyte Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Perry, P., and S. Wolrf (1974) New Giemsa method for differen tial staining of sister chromatids. Nature (Lond.) 261:156–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Latt, S.A. (1973) Microflurometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 70:3395–3399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pesch, G.G., and C.E. Pesch (1980) Neanthes arenaceodentata (Polychaeta: Annelida), a proposed cytogenetic model for marine genetic toxicology. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:1225–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daoud, C., M.W. Shaw, and A. Craig-Holmes, (1976) Sister chromatid exchange frequency among normal individuals and breast cancer patients. Mammalian Chromosome Newsletter 17:26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lambert, B., A. Lindblad, K. Holmberg, and D. Francesconi (1982) The use of sister chromatid exchange to monitor human populations for exposures to toxicologically harmful agents. In Sister chromatid Exchange, S. Wolff, ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 149–182.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brögger, A. (1982) Application of SCE to public health. In Progress and Topics in Cytogenetics, Vol. 2., Sister Chromatid Exchange, A.A. Sandberg, ed. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, pp. 655–673.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raposa, T. (1978) Sister chromatid exchange studies for monitoring DNA damage and repair capacity after cytostatics in vitro and in lymphocytes of leukaemic patients under cytostatic therapy. Mutat. Res. 57:241–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kligerman, A.D., J.L. Wilmer, and G.L. Erexson (1981) Characterization of a rat lymphocyte culture system for assessing sister chromatid exchange after in vivo exposure to genotoxic agents. Environ. Mutagen. 3:531–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kligerman, A.D., J.L. Wilmer, and G.L. Erexson (1982) Characterization of a rat lymphocyte culture system for assessing sister chromatid exchange. II. Effects of 5-bromodeoxyuridine concentration, number of white blood cells in the inoculum, and inoculum volume. Environ. Mutagen. 4:585–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erexson, G.L., J.L. Wilmer, and A.D. Kligerman (1983) Analyses of sister-chromatid exchange and cell-cycle kinetics in mouse T-and B-lymphocytes from peripheral blood cultures. Mutat. Res. 109:271–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metcalf, W.K. (1965) Some experiments on the phytohaemagglutinin culture of leucocytes from rats, and other mammals. Exp. Cell Res. 40:490–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lilly, L.J., A.M. Cobon, and M.F. Newton (1979) Chromosomal aberations induced in rat lymphocytes by in vivo exposure to chemicals. A short term method of carcinogenicity screening. Meth. Find. Exptl. Clin. Pharmacol. 1:225–231.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basler, A. (1982) SCEs in lymphocytes of rats after exposure in vivo to cigarette smoke or to cyclophosphamide. Mutat. Res .102:137–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beltz, P.A., and R.D. Benz (1980) Nondestructive cytogenetic toxicologic testing with rats. Environ. Mutagen. 2:297 (abstract) .Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granberg-Ohman, I., S. Johansson, and A. Hjerpe (1980) Sister-chromatid exchanges and chromosome aberrations in rats treated with phenacetin, phenazone and caffeine. Mutat. Res. 79:13–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tates, A.D., N. de Vogel, and I. Neuteboom (1980) Cytogenetic effects in hepatocytes, bone marrow cells and blood lymphocytes of rats exposed to ethanol in the drinking water. Mutat. Res .79:285–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sprent, J. (1977) Recirculating lymphocytes. In The Lympho cyte: Structure and Function, Part 1, J.J. Marchalonis, ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 43–112.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Obe, G., and B. Beek (1982) The human leucocyte test system. In Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for their Detection, Vol. 7, F.J. de Serres and A. Hollaender, eds. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 337–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buckton, K.E., P.G. Smith, and W.M. Court Brown, (1967) The estimation of lymphocyte lifespan from studies on males treated with x-rays for ankylosing spondylitis. In Human Radiation Cytogenetics, H.J. Evans, W.M. Court Brown, and A.S. McLean, eds. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 106–114.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dolphin, G.W., D.C. Lloyd, and R.J. Purrott (1973) Chromosome aberration analysis as a dosimetric technique in radiological protection. Health Physics 27:7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinson, S.H., G. Brecher, I.S. Lourie, and J.E. Haley (1965) Lymphocyte labeling in rats during and after continuous infusion of tritiated thymidine: Implications for lymphocyte longevity and DNA reutilization. Blood 26:281–295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Röpke, C., and N.B. Everett (1973) Small lymphocyte populations in the mouse bone marrow. Cell Tissue Kinet. 6:499–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carrano, A.V., and D.H. Moore II (1982) The rationale and methodology for quantifying sister chromatid exchange in humans. In Mutagenicity: New Horizons in Genetic Toxicology, J.A. Heddle, ed. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 267–304.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans, H.J. (1976) Cytological methods for detecting chemical mutagens. In Chemical mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection, Vol. 4, A. Hollaender, ed. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Waalkens, D.H., H.F.P. Joosten, R.D.F.M. Taalman, J.M.J.C. Scheres, T.D. Yih, and A. Hoekstra (1981) Sister chromatid ex changes induced in vitro by cyclophosphamide without exogenous activation in lymphocytes from three mammalian species. Toxicol. Letters 7:229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilmer, J.L., G.L. Erexson, and A.D. Kligerman (1984) Sister chromatid exchange induction in mouse B and T lymphocytes exposed to cyclophosphamide in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res .(44:880–884).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schalm, O.W., N.C. Jain, and E.J. Carroll (1975) Veterinary Hematology. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Busbee, D.L., C.R. Shaw, and E.T. Cantee II (1972) Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in human leukocytes. Science 178:315–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gurtoo, H.L., A.J. Marinella, H.J. Freedman, B. Paigen, and J. Minowada (1978) Cytochrome P-450 in a cultured human lymphocyte line. Biochem. Pharmacol. 27:2659–2662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kligerman, A.D., J.L. Wilmer, and G.L. Erexson (1982) The use of rat and mouse lymphocytes to study cytogenetic damage after in vivo exposure to genotoxic agents. In Banbury Report 13: Indicators of Genotoxic Exposure, B.A. Bridges, B.E. Butterworth, and I.B. Weinstein, eds. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, pp. 277–291.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilmer, J.L., G.L. Erexson, and A.D. Kligerman (1983) Implications of an elevated sister-chromatid exchange frequency in rat lymphocytes cultured in the absence of erythrocytes. Mutat. Res. 109:231–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keller, S.E., J.M. Weiss, S.J. Schleifer, N.E. Miller, and M. Stein (1981) Suppression of immunity by stress: Effect of a graded series of stressors on lymphocyte stimulation in the rat. Science 213:1397–1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A.D. Kilgerman, and M. Cheng (unpublished data).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kligerman, A.D., G.L. Erexson, J.L. Wilmer, and M.C. Phelps (1983) Analysis of cytogenetic damage in rat lymphocytes following in vivo exposure to nitrobenzene. Toxicol. Letters 18:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    DuFrain, R.J., L.G. Littlefield, and J.L. Wilmer (1980) The effect of washing lymphocytes after in vivo treatment with strep-tonigrin on the yield of chromosome and chromatid aberrations in blood cultures. Mutat. Res. 69:101–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G.L. Erexson (unpublished data).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Greaves, M., and G. Janossy (1972) Elicitation of selective T and B lymphocyte responses by cell surface binding ligands. Transplant. Rev. 11:87–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Santesson, B., K. Lindahl-Kiessling, and A. Mattesson (1979) SCE in B and T lymphocytes. Possible implications for Bloom’s syndrome. Clin. Genet. 16:133–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lindblad, A., and B. Lambert (1981) Relation between sister chromatid exchange, cell proliferation and proportion of B and T cells in human lymphocyte cultures. Human. Genet. 57:31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Saxon, A., J. Feldhaus, and R.A. Robins (1976) Single step sep aration of human T and B cells using AET treated SRBC rosettes. J. Immunol. Meth. 12:285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kligerman, A.D., J.L. Wilmer, and G.L. Erexson (unpublished data).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kligerman, A.D., G.L. Erexson, M.E. Phelps, and J.L. Wilmer (1983) Sister-chromatid exchange induction in peripheral blood lymphocytes of rats exposed to ethylene oxide by inhalation. Mutat. Res. 120:37–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kligerman, A.D., M.C. Phelps, and G.L. Erexson (1984) Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from rats following formaldehyde inhalation. Toxicol. Letters (in press).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Erexson, G.L., J.L. Wilmer, C.D. Auman, and A.D. Kligerman (1984) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges and micronuclei in male DBA/2 mice after inhalation of benzene. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Environmental Mutagen Society, Montreal, Canada, February 19–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Kligerman
    • 1
  • G. L. Erexson
    • 1
  • J. L. Wilmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Industry Institute of ToxicologyResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations