Advertisement

Ethylene Oxide and Some Factors Affecting the Mutagen Sensitivity of Sister Chromatid Exchange in Humans

  • V. F. Garry
  • J. K. Wiencke
  • R. L. Nelson

Abstract

In our laboratory, we consider mutagenesis and the factors surrounding a mutagenic event as a series of barrier systems (Fig. 1), any one of which can affect a final biological outcome in humans. For example, a mutagen can only exert an effect if it indeed has access to a portal of entry. Physical parameters such as solubility affect skin absorption (1). Particle size will determine whether a particulate is respirable (2). Taken together, the physical/chemical barriers at the portal of entry limit carcinogen access to an organism. Beyond this point, the extracellular fluid (e.g., blood plasma) may limit or augment a mutagenic effect. In our studies shown here and elsewhere in this volume, we (Wiencke, et al.) demonstrate that sister chromatid exchange (SCE) mutagen effects can be modulated by blood plasma (3). Indeed, Lambert et al. (4) have indicated this possibility earlier. The complex environment of peripheral blood presents a myriad of cell types (erythrocytes, other mononuclear cells, neutrophils, and platelets) which may alter the mutagen response in phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocytes. An elegant series of studies (5) shows quite clearly that erythrocytes activate at least 1 carcinogen, styrene, which otherwise is inactive in purified lymphocyte cultures, i.e., the target cell.

Keywords

Ethylene Oxide Ethylene Oxide Sister Chromatid Exchange Mutagen Sensitivity Mutagen Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bock, F. (1977) In Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. Marzullo and H. Majbach, eds. Wiley Publishing Co., New York, pp. 473–485.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menzel, D., and R. McClellan (1980) In Toxicology, 2nd Ed, J. Doull, C. Klaasen, and M. Amdur, eds. MacMillan Pub. Co., New York, pp. 255–272.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiencke, J., K. Kelsey, R. Kreiger, and V. Garry (1984) Serum and plasma dependent variations in benzo(a)pyrene induced sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes. In Sister Chromatid Exchange, R. Tice and A. Hollaender, eds. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lambert, B., A. Lindblad, K. Holmberg, and D. Francesconi (1982) The use of sister chromatid exchange to monitor human populations for exposure to toxicologically harmful agents. In Sister Chromatid Exchange, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 164–165.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norppa, H., and J. Tursi (1984) Erythrocyte-mediated metabol ic activation detected by SCE. In Sister Chromatid Exchange, 25 Years of Experimental Research, R. Tice and A. Hollaender, eds. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wiencke, J., J. Vosika, P. Johnson, and V. Garry (1982) Differential induction of sister chromatid exchange by chemical carcinogens in lymphocytes cultured from patients with solid tumors. Pharmacology 24:67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurvink, K., C. Bloomfield, and J. Cervenka (1978) Sister chromatid exchange in patients with viral disease. Exp. Cell Res. 113:450–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garry, V., J. Hozier, D. Jacobs, R. Wade, and D. Gray (1979) Ethylene oxide: Evidence of human chromosomal effects. Environ. Mutagen. 1:375–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser, Z. (1977) Use of ethylene oxide as a sterilant in medical facilities. PHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77-200, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ehrenberg, L., and T. Hallston (1967) Haematologic studies on person occupationally exposed to ethylene oxide. International Agency Report, SM 92/26, pp. 327–334.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gross, J., M. Haas, and T. Swift (1978) Ethylene oxide neuropathy. Neurology 28:355 (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raposa, T. (1978) Sister chromatid exchange studies for monitoring DNA damage and repair capacity after cytostatics in vitro and in lymphocytes of leukemic patients under cytostatic therapy. Mutat. Res. 57:241–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Littlefield, L., S. Colyer, A. Sayer, and R. DuFrain (1979) Sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes exposed during GO to four classes of DNA-damaging chemicals. Mutat. Res.67:259–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kowalczyk, J. (1980) Sister chromatid exchanges in children treated with nalidixic acid. Mutat. Res. 77:371–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Djuric, D. (1983) Encyclopedia of Health and Safety, 3rd Ed; L. Parmeggiani, ed. International Labor Office, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 812–818.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garry, V., C. Opp, J. Wiencke, and D. Lakatua (1982) Ethylene oxide induced sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes using a membrane dosimetry system. Pharmacology 25:214–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lambert, B., A. Lindblad, M. Nordenskjold, and B. Werelius (1978) Increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in cigarette smokers. Hereditas 88:147–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knuutila, S., J. Maki-Pookkanen, M. Kahkonen, and E. Hokkanen (1978) An increased frequency of chromosomal changes and SCEs in cultured blood lymphocytes from 12 subjects vaccinated against smallpox. Human Gen. 41:89–96.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yager, J., C. Hines, and R. Spear (1983) Exposure to ethylene oxide at work increases sister chromatid exchanges in human peripheral lymphocytes. Science 219:1221–1223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan, E., R. Cummings, and A. Hsie (1981) Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of ethylene oxide in the CHO/HGPRT system. Environ. Mutagen. 3:683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pero, R., B. Widegren, B. Hoegstedt, and F. Mitelman (1981) In. vivo and in vitro ethylene oxide exposure of human lymphocytes assessed by chemical stimulation of unscheduled DNA synthesis. Mutat. Res. 83:271–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dunkelberg, H. (1982) Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide and 1,2 propylene oxide upon intragastric administration to rats. Br. J. Cancer 46:924–933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snellings, W., C. Weil, and R. Maronpot (1981) Final report on ethylene oxide two-year inhalation study on rats. Project Report 44-20, Bushy Run Research Center (formerly Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. F. Garry
    • 1
  • J. K. Wiencke
    • 1
  • R. L. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Environmental PathologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations