Advertisement

Attitude Change Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice

  • John H. Harvey
  • Gifford Weary
  • James E. Maddux
  • John S. Jordan
  • Kathryn S. Galvin

Abstract

In this chapter we shall focus on the relevance to clinical practice of social psychological theories of attitude formation and change. We shall argue that attitude change processes are important in all major approaches to psychotherapy and that three decades of social psychological research attention to attitude development and change provide an empirical foundation for the investigation of persuasion as a clinical treatment strategy. The general position that clinical practice should be informed by the substantial literature on attitudes and attitude change is not original (e.g., see S. S. Brehm, 1976; Goldstein & Simonson, 1971, Goldstein, Heller, & Sechrest, 1966; Strong, 1978). However, it is our objective to provide a new look at the literature to which researchers and practitioners should be especially attentive in considering the nature and importance of persuasion in psychotherapy. We shall begin by examining the idea that attitude change processes are fundamental to all psychotherapies and shall then outline several attitude change conceptions that should have relevance to clinical practice. Finally, we shall present examples of recent research that examined the role of attitude change in clinical and counseling contexts.

Keywords

Attitude Change Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Response Dysfunctional Attitude Psychotherapy Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. The person in psychology. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E. Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Axsom, D., & Cooper, J. Reducing weight by reducing dissonance: The role of effort justification in inducing weight loss. In E. Aronson, (Ed.), Readings about the social animal. (3rd ed.). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: Meridian Books, 1976Google Scholar
  5. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 183–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehm, S. S. The application of social psychology to clinical practice. New York: Halsted Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Brodsky, A. M. Sex, race, and class issues in psychotherapy research. In J. H. Harvey & M. M. Parks (Eds.), The Master Lecture Series. Vol. 1. Psychotherapy research and behav-ior change. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, J. Reducing fears and increasing assertiveness: The role of dissonance reduction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, J., & Axsom, D. Effort justification in psychotherapy. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Corrigan, J. D., Dell, D. M., Lewis, K. N., & Schmidt, L. D. Counseling as a social influence process: A review. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monographs, 1980, 27, 395–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craighead, L. W., & Craighhead, W. E. Implications of persuasive communication research for the modification of self-statements. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1980, 4, 117134.Google Scholar
  14. Dell, D. M. Counselor power base, influence attempts, and behavior change in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1973, 20, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doob, L. W. The behavior of attitudes. Psychological Review, 1947, 54, 135–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, A. Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. Acceptance, yielding, and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Goldfried, M. R. Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 991–999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, A. P., & Simonson, N. R. Social psychological approaches to psychotherapy research. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein, A. P., Heller, K., & Sechrest, L. B. Psychotherapy and the psychology of behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  22. Greenwald, A. G. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, B., & Harvey, J. H. Social psychological concepts applied to clinical processes: On the need for precision. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 326–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey, J. H., & Harris, B. Determinants of perceived choice and the relationship between perceived choice and expectancy about feelings of internal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes, D. S. Investigations of repression: Differential recall of material experimentally or naturally associated with ego threat. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 632–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovland, C. T., Janis, I. J., & Kelley, H. H. Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, C. L. The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 1932, 39, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E., & Miller, N. Attitude change. New York: Wiley, 1969Google Scholar
  29. Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. Cognitive and self-control therapies. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. Meador, B. D., & Rogers, C. R. Person-centered therapy. In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current psychotherapies. Itasco, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1979.Google Scholar
  31. Mosak, H. H. Adlerian psychotherapy. In R. Corsini (Ed.), Current psychotherapies. Itasco, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Murray, E. J., & Jacobson, L. I. Cognition and learning in traditional and behavioral psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  33. Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. The relation of process to outcome in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1981.Google Scholar
  35. Petty, R. E., Ostrum, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  36. Stampfl, T., & Lewis, D. Essentials of implosive therapy: A learning theory based psy-chodynamic behavior therapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967, 72, 496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strong, S. R. Counseling: An interpersonal influence process. Journal of Counseling Psy-chology, 1968, 15, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strong, S. R. Social psychological approach to psychotherapy research. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  39. Strong, S. R., & Claiborn, C. D. Change through interaction. New York: Wiley, 1982Google Scholar
  40. Strupp, H. H. Psychotherapy research and practice: An overview. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. Strupp, H. H., & Bergin, A. E. Some empirical and conceptual bases for coordinated research in psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 7, 18–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thurstone, L. L. Comment. American Journal of Sociology, 1946, 52, 39–40.Google Scholar
  43. Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  44. Wolpe, J. The conditioning therapies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Harvey
    • 1
  • Gifford Weary
    • 2
  • James E. Maddux
    • 1
  • John S. Jordan
    • 3
  • Kathryn S. Galvin
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Duke Medical SchoolDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Counseling CenterTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations