Advertisement

Religious Experience and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

  • Kaisa Puhakka

Abstract

Religion is a world view that imbues thought, feeling, and action with significance and value. Such a characterization is, of course, too broad to be considered a definition of religion. Its purpose is merely to call attention to some basic features that religion shares with other forms of human thought and action—in particular, with science. Scientific activity, like religious activity, is embedded in a world view that furnishes its rationale and purpose. The religion of the average person is seldom articulated as a coherent system of value and belief. But the same holds true for the average scientist. As Kuhn (1971) has pointed out, the practitioners of science are usually unaware of the presuppositions that guide their scientific practice. Long before Kuhn called attention to the similarity between this aspect of scientific and religious practice, William James (1902/1979) had noted another obvious similarity, namely, that not only religious ideas and sentiments but also scientific ones are rooted in the psychological and physiological conditions of the human mind.

Keywords

Religious Experience Human Thought Religious Orientation Religious Commitment Human Consciousness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. Religion and prejudice. Crane Review, 1959, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1966, 5, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1967, 5, 432–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barron, F. An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1953, 17, 327–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, R. J. Religion and psychological health. In M. B. Merton (Ed.), Research on religious development. New York: Hawthorne, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. DeJong, G. F., Faulker, J. E., & Warland, R. H. Dimensions of religiosity reconsidered: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Social Forces, 1976, 54, 866–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feagin, J. R. Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of Southern fundamentalists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1964, 4, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freud, S. Civilization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton, 1962. (Originally published, 1930)Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S., The future of an illusion. New York: Anchor Books, 1964. (Originally published, 1927)Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. Obsessive actions and religious practices. In W. Sadler (Ed.), Personality and religion. New York: Harper Forum, 1970. (Originally published, 1907)Google Scholar
  13. Friedrichs, R. W. A sociology of sociology. New York: Collier, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Friedrichs, R. W. The functionalist paradigm dominating the social-scientific study of religion and a structural alternative. Council on the Study of Religion Bulletin,1982, 13(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  15. Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. Glock, C. On the study of religious commitment. Research Supplement of Religious Education,1962, 7, 98–110.Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg, A. (Ed.). The psychology of the self: A casebook. New York: International Universities Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Hay, D. Religious experience amongst a group of post-graduate students: A qualitative study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,1979, 18, 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hood, R. W., Jr. Forms of religious commitment and intense religious experience. Review of Religious Research, 1973, 15, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, R. A., & King, M. B. The intrinsic-extrinsic concept: A review and evaluation. In J. R. Tisdale (Ed.), Growing edges in the psychology of religion. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. James, W. Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green, 1940. (Originally published, 1912)Google Scholar
  22. James, W. The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier, 1979. (Originally published, 1902)Google Scholar
  23. Kavanagh, G. The measurement of religiosity: Problems and progress. Unpublished manuscript: Menninger Foundation, 1978.Google Scholar
  24. Khan, M. The privacy of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. King, M. B., & Hunt, R. A. Measuring religious dimensions: Studies of congregational involve‑ment (SMU Studies in Social Science, Vol. 1). Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  26. Kohut, H., The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  27. Kohut, H. The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. Mehan, H., & Wood, H., The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  30. Pruyser, P. Between belief and unbelief. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. Reik, T. Ritual: Psycho-analytic studies (D. Bryan, trans). New York: W. W. Norton, 1931.Google Scholar
  32. Stark, R. Psychopathology and religious commitment. Review of Religious Research, 1971, 12, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stark, R., & Glock, C. American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  34. Stolorow, R. D. Psychoanalytic reflections on client-centered therapy in the light of modern conceptions of narcissism. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1976, 13, 2629.Google Scholar
  35. Tisdale, J. R. Introduction: Definition and measurement. In J. R. Tisdale (Ed.), Growing edges in the psychology of religion. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  36. Winnicott, D. W. Playing and reality. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  37. Wuthnow, R. Two traditions in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1981, 20, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaisa Puhakka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryMedical College of OhioToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations