Advertisement

Pressurized Thermal Shock — An Integrated Analysis

  • B. Chexal
  • T. Marston
  • T. Griesbach
  • J. Chao
  • B. Layman

Abstract

The potential for long term neutron embrittlement of reactor vessels has been recognized for a number of years. Reactor vessel thermal shock is not a new concern, but with a growing number of plants approaching their mid-lives, it is a concern that must be understood and dealt with. Recent attention has focused on the performance of vessels during overcooling transients. This concern was designated as Unresolved Safety Issue A-49 by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in December 1981. The USNRC staff has identified eight overcooling events of concern in U.S. PWRs (Table 1). The concern is currently limited to Pressurized Water Reactors. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has supported research on reactor vessel integrity for a number of years and has supported an extensive effort on reactor vessel pressurized thermal shock (PTS) over the last three years. In addition, EPRI has developed a linked set of computer codes to simulate the pressurized thermal shock transients and assess the integrity of the nuclear reactor vessels for various overcooling transients. This paper focuses on the integrated analysis approach being used by EPRI in performing such analysis.

Keywords

Reactor Vessel Steam Generator Electric Power Research Institute Pressurize Water Reactor Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.K. (Bindi) Chexal, T.U. Marston, and B.K.H. Sun, “EPRI’s Efforts to Resolve Pressurized Thermal Shock Issue,” Journal of Nuclear Engineering International, May 1982.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “RETRAN-02, A Program for Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Complex Fluid Flow Systems,” Volume 1-4, EPRI NP-1850-CCM, May 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C Peterson, B. Chexal, W. Layman, J. Chao, T. Clements and S. Lucas, “SBLOCA Analysis with RETRAN-02 for a Westinghouse PWR for Pressurized Thermal Shock Applications,” EPRI report in preparation.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.K. (Bindi) Chexal, J. Chao, R. Nickell, and T. Griesbach, “Simple Mixing Model for Pressurized Thermal Shock Applications,” Nuclear Engineering & Design, Vol. 74, No. 2, June 1983, Pages 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    “COMMIX-1A: A Three-Dimensional Transient Single Phase Component Computer Program for Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-0785, September 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.H. Rothe and M.F. Ackerson, “Fluid and Thermal Mixing in a Cold Leg and Downcomer with Loop Flow,” EPRI Report NP-2312, April 1982.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Hashemi, J. Goodman and A. Munis, “Transient Thermal Mixing in a Model Cold Leg With High Pressure Injection and a Downcomer,” EPRI draft report in preparation.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    “ABAQUS-EPGEN User’s Manual,” EPRI Report RP1324-3, July 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    “EPRI Short Course on ABAQUS and PTS1,” Palo Alto, California, February 14-16, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “NRC Staff Evaluation of Pressurized Thermal Shock,” SECY-82-465, November 198 2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Proposed Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) Rule,” SECY-83-288, July 15, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Chexal
    • 1
  • T. Marston
    • 1
  • T. Griesbach
    • 1
  • J. Chao
    • 1
  • B. Layman
    • 1
  1. 1.Electric Power Research InstitutePalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations