Use of Ultrasonic Techniques to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Steels

  • B. E. Droney


A computer-based ultrasonic test system was assembled to automatically acquire ultrasonic velocity and attenuation data on commercial steel samples. Attenuation data on plain carbon plate steels showed significant statistical correlation to ferrite grain size and to yield strength, but more consistent coupling is needed if the technique is to be developed into an on-line test for steel plates. Surface-wave velocity and attenuation data on sheet steel samples undergoing tensile testing (acoustoelastic data) were found to be weakly correlated to yield strength. Variations in residual and bending stresses precluded consideration of acoustoelasticity as as on-line technique to determine properties of sheet. Our recent work has focused on nondestructively determining the anisotropy in velocity and attenuation in sheet steel samples, and on relating this data to mechanical properties. The potential for developing an on-line technique to determine crystallographic texture looks promising, based on recent tests using electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) to generate shear-wave and Lamb-wave modes in sheet.


Ultrasonic Velocity Crystallographic Texture Ultrasonic Attenuation Velocity Anisotropy Attenuation Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Klinman, G. R. Webster, F. J. Marsh and E. T. Stephenson, “Ultrasonic Prediction of Grain Size, Strength, and Toughness in Plain Carbon Steel,” Materials Evaluation 38 (1980) 26–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Klinman and E. T. Stephenson, “Ultrasonic Prediction of Grain Size and Mechanical Properties in Plain Carbon Steel,” Materials Evaluation 39 (1981) 1116–1120.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Hirao, H. Fukuoka, K. Hori, “Acoustoelastic Effect of Rayleigh Surface Wave in Isotropic Material,” J. Appl. Mech. 48 (1981) 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. A. Brezeale and J. Philip, “Relation of the Third-Order Elastic Constants to Other Nonlinear Quantities,” Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (1981) 425–431.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. E. Droney and R. Klinman, “Ultrasonic Techniques for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Steels,” Proc. AIP Conf. Physics in the Steel Industry (1981) 210–228.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Kitagawa, “Analysis of Elastic Anisotropy in Cold Rolled Steel Sheet,” Sixth Int. Conf. on Textures of Materials, Tokyo (1981) 1166–1178.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. E. MacDonald, “On Determining Stress and Texture Using Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements,” IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU-28 (1981) 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. C. Johnson, “On the Applicability of Acoustoelasticity for Residual Stress Determination.” J. Appl. Mech. 48 (1981) 791–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. E. Green, “Ultrasonic Investigation of Mechanical Properties,” Treatise on Materials Science and Technology (H. Herman, ed.) Chap. II, Academic Press, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. R. Mould and T. E. Johnson, Jr., “Rapid Assessment of Drawability of Cold-Rolled Low-Carbon Steel Sheets,” Sheet Metal Ind. (1973) 328–348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. E. Droney
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DepartmentBethlehem Steel CorporationBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations