Teaching Value Clarification

The Example of Gender and Psychotherapy
  • Patricia Perri Rieker
  • Elaine (Hilberman) Carmen

Abstract

Teaching residents in psychiatry to be aware of sexist attitudes in psychiatric theory, training, and practice is difficult for both the instructors and the trainees. When residents are confronted with the extent to which sex-role socialization has shaped not only their own values but also the values and behaviors of their mentors, patients, and intimates, they respond with intense anxiety. The instructors, as the messengers who bring the “bad” news, become the objects of their hostility and frustration. Thus, an important aspect of the instructor role is the ability to remain empathic (and nonviolent) when confronted with the most creative forms of resistance to learning. Until recently, there has been little reinforcement for residents to explore gender attitudes and few rewards for instructors’ efforts to teach in this affect-laden and value-conflicted area.1 In this paper we describe an effective model for teaching and evaluating a one-semester course on gender and psychotherapy, in which a central feature is team teaching by a psychiatrist and a sociologist.

Keywords

Resi Sonal Clarification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carmen E. (H.), Driver F.: Teaching women’s studies: values in conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly 7 (1): 81–95, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmen E. (H.), Russo N. F., Miller J. B.: Inequality and women’s mental health: an overview. Am J Psychiatry 138: 1319–1330, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone A. A.: Presidential address: conceptual ambiguity and morality in modern psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 137: 887–891, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rawlings E. I., Carter D. K.: Values and value change in psychotherapy, in Psychotherapy for Women. Edited by Rawlings E. I., Carter D. K., Springfield, Ill., Charles C. Thomas, 1977Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rieker P., Begun J.: Translating social science concepts into medical education: a model and a curriculum. Soc Sci Med [A] 14: 601–612, 1980Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayes S. S.: Women in positions of authority: a case study of changing sex roles. Signs 4: 556–568, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Light D.: Becoming Psychiatrists: The Professional Transformation of Self. New York, W. W. Norton & Co., 1981Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goffman E.: Asylums, New York, Doubleday, 1961Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tavris C., Offir C.: The Longest War—Sex Differences in Perspective. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller J. B.: Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston, Beacon Press, 1976Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morin S. F., Garfinkle E. M.: Male homophobia. Journal of Social Issues. 34(1)29–47, 1978 )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis R. A.: Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues 34 (1): 108–121, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pleck J. H.: Men’s family work: three perspectives and some new data. The Family Coordinator 28: 481–488, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lerner H. E.: Early origins of envy and devaluation of women: implications for sex role stereotypes. Bull Menninger Clin 38: 538–553, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bieniek C., Barton G. M., Benedek E.: Training female mental health professionals: sexual countertransference issues. J Am Med Worn Assoc 36 (4): 131–139, 1981Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davidson V.: Psychiatry’s problem with no name: therapist–patient sex. Am J Psychoanal 37: 43–50, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goin M. K., Kline F. Countertransference: a neglected subject in clinical supervision. Am Psychiatry 133: 41–44, 1976Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Psychiatric Association 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Perri Rieker
  • Elaine (Hilberman) Carmen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations