Therapy-Comparison within a Rehabilitation Framework

  • Herbert Mackinger


In Salzburg/Austria, restructuring of wards was undertaken on a large scale in the course of the general reform of psychiatric in-patient treatment. Among other things, part of the closed ward for the chronically ill was to be closed, and the patients were to be transferred to an open home on hospital grounds in order to meet the requirements of late rehabilitation (Gastager, 1969). The patients chosen were to be prepared for their new living arrangements with the aid of psychological training-programs, so that optimal minimization of the risks involved could be achieved, or better, greatest possible success of the training programs would mean maximum subjective well-being on the part of the patients as well as their successful mastering of the new requirements of the home.


Living Arrangement Hospital Ground Open Home Closed Ward General Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alevizos, P., DeRisi, W., Liberman, R.P., Eckman, T. and Callahan, E., 1978, Journal of appl. Behay.Anal., 11: 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gastager, H., 1969, Frührehabilitation und Spätrehabilitation von Psychosen, Psychother. Psychosom., 17: 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jablensky, A., Schwarz, R. and Tomow, J., 1980, WHO-Collaborative Study on Impairments and disabilities associated with schizophrenic disorders. Acta psychiat.scand., 62, Supp. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krawiecka, M., Goldberg, D. and Vaughn, M., 1977, A standardized psychiatric assessment scale for rating chronic psychotic patients. Acta psychiat.scand, 55: 299–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Licht, M. H., 1979, The Staff-Resident Interaction Chronograph: Observational Assessment of Staff Performance. Journal of Behay. Ass., 1: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mackinger, H., Schiepek, G. und Gurtner, M., 1983, Laien als Therapeuten in einem Projekt mit chronischen psychiatrischen Patienten, in: “Gemeindepsychologische Perspektiven, 2, Interventionsprinzipien”, St.Fliegel, B. Röhrle und W.Stark, Hrsg., DGVT und GwG, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  7. Paul, G., 1969, Behavior Modification Research: Design and Tactics, in: “Behavior Therapy; Appraisal and Status”, C.F. Franks, ed., McGraw-Hill, London-New York.Google Scholar
  8. Paul, G. and Lentz, R.J., 1977, “Psychosocial Treatment of Chronic Mental Patients; Milieu versus social-learning programs”, Harvard Univ.Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Platt, J.J. and Spivack, G., 1975, Manual for the Means-EndsProblem-Solving procedure (MEPS); A Measure of interpersonal cognitive Problem-solving skill, Hahnemann Community Mental Health Center, Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  10. Schiepek, G., 1983, “Probleme der Praxisforschung in stationären sozial-psychiatrischen Einrichtungen”, AVM-Verlag Salzburg (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Mackinger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Psychology at the University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Hospital for Nervous and Mental Diseases, SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations