On Conditions, Concepts and Theories of Psychoanalytic In-Patient Psychotherapy

  • Micheal Ermann


Psychoanalytic in-patient psychotherapy is closely connected with some milestones in the course of history of psychiatry1,2 which is linked with famous names like Chestnut-Lodge, Topeka, Maudesley, Cassel, Cery, Tiefenbrunn or Sonnenberg. It has, however, developed in several countries to a very different degree as an independent form of psychotherapy. Within the Anglo-Saxon and the Francophone countries psychoanalytically orientated hospitals as special units have developed in close connection with different branches of psyhiatry3, but within Central Europe and especially in the Federal Republic of Germany there has developed since World War II an institutionally rather independent scope of psychotherapy/psychosomatics within the overlapping field of psychiatry, inner medicine and psychoanalysis the corner-stones of which are independent psychoanalytic hospitals4,5. I want to give a short survey of the theoretical and conceptual elements of this form of psychotherapy which on the base of my experiences in the F.R.G. seem to be the most important to me.


Independent Form Conceptual Element Shelter Area Francophone Country Team Supervision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Simmel, Die psychoanalytische Behandlung in der Klinik, Int. Z. Psychoanal. 14: 352 (1928).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. C. Menninger, Psychoanalytic principles applied to the treatment of hospitalized patients, Bull. Menninger Clin. 1: 35 (1936).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. F. Main, The hospital as a therapeutic institution, Bull. Menninger Clin. 10: 66 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Köhle, Klinisch-psychosomatische Krankenstationen, in: “Lehrbuch der Psychosomatischen Midizin”, Th. v. Uexküll, ed., Urban & Schwarzenberg, München (1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Janssen, Behandlungsmodelle der stationären Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Prax. Psychother. Psychosom. 28: 95 (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Wiegmann, “Der Neurotiker in der Klinik”, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Enke, Bipolare Gruppenpsychotherapie, Z. Psychother. med. Psychol. 15: 116 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Kernberg, Psychoanalytic object-relations theory, group process, and administration, Annu. Psychoanal. 1: 368 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micheal Ermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Institute for Mental HealthMannheim 1Germany

Personalised recommendations