Shorebirds pp 125-147 | Cite as

Breeding Area Fidelity, Natal Philopatry, and the Social Systems of Sandpipers

  • Lewis W. Oring
  • David B. Lank


Sexual selection and kin selection theory have advanced with leaps and bounds in recent years, providing a framework for the study of mating system evolution and expression. Theoretical development has been enhanced by utilization of electrophoretic and various field techniques that aid in determination of parentage. At the same time, field studies of the long-term mating relationships of individually marked animals have shed new light on the genetic relationships within and between wild populations.


Return Rate Site Fidelity Natal Philopatry Site Tenacity Breeding Site Fidelity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, F. S., 1948, Contributions to the biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax L.), Part II, Dan. Ornithol. Foren. Tidsskr 42: 125–148.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, F. S., 1951, Contributions to the biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax L.), Part III, Dan. Ornithol. Foren. Tidsskr 45: 145–173.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M. C., and Marler, P., 1980, Behavioral adaptations that constrain the gene pool in vertebrates, in: Evolution of Social Behavior: Hypotheses and Empirical Tests ( H. Markl, ed.), pp. 59–80, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.Google Scholar
  4. Barrowclough, G. F., 1980, Gene flow, effective population sizes, and genetic variance components in birds, Evolution 34: 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman, R. D., 1974, Wetlands and waterbirds at Point Storkersen, Alaska, Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
  6. Catchpole, C. K., 1972, A comparative study of territory in the Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and Sedge Warbler (A. schoenobaenus), J. Zool 166: 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drury, W. H., Jr., 1961, The breeding biology of shorebirds on Bylot Island, Northwest Territories, Canada, Auk 78: 176–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W., 1977, Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems, Science 197: 215–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwood, P. J., 1980, Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals, Anim. Behay 28: 1140–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenwood, P. J., and Harvey, P. H., 1976, The adaptive significance of variation in breeding area fidelity of the Blackbird (Turdus merula L.), J. Anim. Ecol 45: 887–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwood, P. J., and Harvey, P. H., 1982, The natal and breeding dispersal of birds, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 13: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., and Perrins, C. M., 1978, Inbreeding and dispersal in the Great Tit, Nature (London) 271: 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H., and Perrins, C. M., 1979, The role of dispersal in the Great Tit (Parus major): The causes, consequences and heritability of natal dispersal, J. Anim. Ecol 48: 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grosskopf, G., 1959, Zur Biologie des Rotschenkels (Tringa t. totanus), II, J. Ornithol 100: 210–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grosskopf, G., 1968, Die Vögel der Insel Wangerooge, Institut für Vogelforschung, No. 5, Mettcker & Söhne, Jever.Google Scholar
  16. Hale, W. G., and Ashcroft, R. P., 1982, Pair formation and pair maintenance in the Redshank Tringa totanus, Ibis 124: 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, P. H., Greenwood, P. J., and Perrins, C. M., 1979, Breeding area fidelity of the Great Tit (Parus major), J. Anim. Ecol 48: 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hays, H., 1972, Polyandry in the Spotted Sandpiper, Living Bird 11: 43–57.Google Scholar
  19. Heldt, R., 1966, Zur Brutbiologie des Alpenstrandläufers, Calidris alpina schinzii, Corax 1: 173–188.Google Scholar
  20. Hildén, 0., 1975, Breeding system of Temminck’s Stint Calidris temminckii, Ornis Fenn. 52: 117–146.Google Scholar
  21. Hilda’, 0., 1978, Population dynamics in Temminck’s Stint Calidris temminckii, Oikos 30: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hildén, 0., 1979, Territoriality and site tenacity of Temminck’s Stint Calidris temminckii, Ovnis Fenn. 56: 56–74.Google Scholar
  23. Hildén, O., and Vuolanto, S., 1972, Breeding biology of the Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus in Finland, Omis Fenn. 49: 57–85.Google Scholar
  24. Hinde, R. A., 1956, The biological significance of the territories of birds, Ibis 98: 340–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes, R. T., 1966, Breeding ecology and annual cycle adaptations of the Red-backed Sandpiper (Calidris alpina) in northern Alaska, Condor 68: 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes, R. T., 1971, Density, habitat, and the mating system of the Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri), Oecologia (Berlin) 7: 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howe, M. A., 1982, Social organization in a nesting population of eastern Willets, Catoptrophorus s. semipalmatus, Auk 99: 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jehl, J. R., Jr., 1973, Breeding biology and systematic relationships of the Stilt Sandpiper Wilson Bull. 85:115–147.Google Scholar
  29. Jonas, R., 1979, Brutbiologische Untersuchungen an einer Population der Uferschnepfe (Limosa limosa), Vogelwelt 100: 125–136.Google Scholar
  30. Kistchinski, A. A., and Flint, V. E., 1973, A case of “double nesting” in the Little Stint (Calidris minuta), in: Fauna and Ecology of Waders, Vol. 1 (V. E. Flint, ed.), Moscow University Press, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  31. Lemnell, A., 1978, Social behavior of the Great Snipe Capella media at the arena display, Omis Scand. 9: 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, E., 1977, Breeding biology of the Least Sandpiper, Calidris minutilla (Vieill.), onGoogle Scholar
  33. Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Ph.D. thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Noordwijk, A. J., and Scharloo, W., 1981, Inbreeding in an island population of the Great mTit, Evolution 35: 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Donald, P., 1980, Sexual selection by female choice in a monogamous bird: Darwin’s theory corroborated, Heredity 45: 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oring, L. W., 1982, Avian mating systems, in: Avian Biology, Vol. 6 ( D. S. Farner, J. R. King, and K. C. Parkes, eds.), pp. 1–92, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Oring, L. W., and Knudson, M. L., 1972, Monogamy and polyandry in the Spotted Sandpiper, Living Bird 11: 59–73.Google Scholar
  37. Oring, L. W., and Lank, D. B., 1982, Sexual selection, arrival times, philopatry and site fidelity in the polyandrous Spotted Sandpiper, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol 10: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oring, L. W., Lank, D. B., and Maxson, S. J., 1983, Population studies of the polyandrous Spotted Sandpiper, Auk. 100: 272–285.Google Scholar
  39. Parmelee, D. F., and Payne, R. B., 1973, On the multiple broods and the breeding strategy of Arctic Sanderlings, Ibis 115: 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pienkowski, M. W., and Greenwood, J. J. D., 1979, Why change males?, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rausch, M. J., 1982, Mating systems and the breeding biology of the Northern Phalarope (Phalaropus lobatus), B.S. honours thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston.Google Scholar
  42. Redmond, R. L., and Jenni, D. A., 1982, Natal philopatry and breeding area fidelity of Long-billed Curlews (Numenius americanus): Patterns and evolutionary consequences, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol 10: 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richdale, L. E., 1957, A Population Study of Penguins, Oxford University Press ( Clarendon ), Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Schamel, D., and Tracy, D., 1977, Polyandry, replacement clutches, and site tenacity in the Red Phalarope (Phalaropus fulicarius) at Barrow, Alaska, Bird-Banding 48: 314324.Google Scholar
  45. Shields, W. M., 1982, Philopatry, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  46. Soikkeli, M., 1967, Breeding cycle and population dynamics in the Dunlin (Calidris alpina), Ann. Zool. Fenn 4: 158–198.Google Scholar
  47. Soikkeli, M., 1970a, Dispersal of Dunlin Calidris alpina in relation to sites of birth and breeding, Ornis Fenn. 47: 1–9.Google Scholar
  48. Soikkeli, M., 1970b, Mortality and reproductive rate in a Finnish population of Dunlin Cal- idris alpina, Ornis Fenn. 47: 149–158.Google Scholar
  49. Sordahl, T. A., 1981, Predator mobbing behavior in the shorebirds of North America, Wader Study Group Bull. 31: 41–44.Google Scholar
  50. Thomas, C. S., 1980, Certain aspects of the breeding biology of the Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla), Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, U.K.Google Scholar
  51. van Rhijn, J. G., 1973, Behavioral dimorphism in male Ruffs, Philomachus pugnax (L.), Behaviour 47: 153–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewis W. Oring
    • 1
  • David B. Lank
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations