The Maverick Solutions

  • Thomas J. Kindt
  • J. Donald Capra


From the mid 1960s to the late 1970s, most immunologists espoused either the germline or somatic theory to explain antibody variability. There were, however, a number of investigators who steadfastly maintained that neither theory adequately explained the structural and/or genetic data. Each proposed different solutions that we refer to here as “maverick” because they do not depend on the germline position (for every immunoglobulin V region there resides in the DNA a faithful copy) or the somatic mutation theory (that in the DNA there exists only a very few genes that somatically mutate and give rise to the great variety of antibody molecules). Although each author of a maverick solution depended on different interpretations of much of the data that has been presented so far in this volume, there were six bodies of evidence that the maverick theorists focused on that were difficult to reconcile with either the germline or somatic theories. We will first review these data and then discuss the various alternative theories that were developed that attempted to explain not only these data but also data generally used to support germline or somatic theories.


Hypervariable Region Amino Acid Sequence Data Somatic Mutation Theory Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Rabbit Allotype 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Bibliography

  1. Capra, J. D., 1976, The implications of phylogenetically associated residues and idiotypes on theories of antibody diversity, in: The Generation of Antibody Diversity: A New Look ( A. J. Cunningham, ed.), Academic Press, New York, p. 65.Google Scholar
  2. Capra, J. D., and Kindt, T. J., 1975, Antibody diversity: Can more than one gene encode each variable region?, editorial, Immunogenetics 1: 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capra, J. D., and Kehoe, J. M., 1974, Structure of antibodies with shared idiotypy: The complete sequence of the heavy chain variable regions of two IsM anti-gamma globulins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 4032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capra, J. D., and Klapper, D. G., 1976, Complete amino acid sequence of the variable domains of two human IgM anti-gamma globulins with shared idiotypic specificities, Scand. J. Immunol. 5: 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edelman, G. M., and Gaily, J. A., 1967, Somatic recombination of duplicated genes: An hypothesis on the origin of antibody diversity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 57: 353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fett, J. W., and Deutsch, H., 1975, A new lambda-chain gene, Immunochemistry 12: 643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gally, J. A., and Edelman, G. M., 1970, Somatic translocation of antibody genes, Nature (London) 227: 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob, F., 1982, The Possible and the Actual, University of Washington Press/Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T., and Bilofsky, H., 1979, Evidence supporting somatic assembly of the DNA segments (minigenes), coding for the framework, and complementarity- determining segments of immunoglobulin variable regions, J. Exp. Med. 149: 1299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kindt, T. J., and Capra, J. D., 1978, Gene-insertion theories of antibody diversity: A reevaluation, Immunogenetics 6: 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kindt, T. J., Klapper, D. G., and Waterfield, M. D., 1973, An idiotypic crossreaction between allotype A3 and allotype a negative rabbit antibodies to streptococcal carbohydrate, J. Exp. Med. 137: 636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klinman, N. R., Sigal, N. H., Metcalf, E. S., Pierce, S. K., and Gearhart, P. J., 1976, The interplay of evolution and environment in B-cell diversification, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 41: 285.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, G. P., 1973, The Variation and Adaptive Expression of Antibodies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  14. Smithies, O., 1970, Pathways through networks of branched DNA, Science 169: 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smithies, O., 1978, Immunoglobulin genes: Arranged in tandem or in parallel?cold spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Bio., p. 725.Google Scholar
  16. Wilkinson, J. M., 1969, Variation in the N-terminal sequence of heavy chains of immunoglobulin G from rabbits of different allotype, Biochem. J. 112: 173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wu, T. T., and Kabat, E. A., 1970, An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity, J. Exp. Med. 132: 211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu, T. T., Kabat, E. A., and Bilofsky, H., 1975, Similarities among hypervariable segments of immunoglobulin chains, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72: 5107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Kindt
    • 1
  • J. Donald Capra
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas Health Science CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations