Advertisement

The Polar Solutions

  • Thomas J. Kindt
  • J. Donald Capra

Abstract

As detailed in previous chapters, the description of antibody diversity moved rapidly in the wake of sophisticated experiments designed to probe the extent of the repertoire. Data obtained by serologists, biochemists, and geneticists all revealed the complexity of immunoglobulin populations and indicated that the capability to produce a large number of antibody molecules was present in a single organism. Whether one arrived at this large number by counting antibody-binding sites, idiotypes, or amino acid sequences of heavy and light chain V regions, the data strongly supported the two-gene hypothesis and underscored the bifunctional nature of the antibody molecule. However, this body of serologic and structural data failed to answer an overriding question, one that dominated the area of immunoglobulin genetics during this time: What was the precise number and nature of V-region genes?

Keywords

Light Chain Somatic Mutation Versus Region Hypervariable Region Polar Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Bibliography

  1. Brenner, S., and Milstein, C., 1966, Origin of antibody variation, Nature (London) 211: 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohn, M., 1970, Selection under a somatic model, Cell. Immunol. 1: 461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohn, M., 1973, Antibody diversification: The somatic mutation model revisited, in: The Biochemistry of Gene Expression in Higher Organisms ( J. K. Pollak and J. W. Lee, eds.), D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 574–592.Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham, B., Gottlieb, P. D., Pflumm, M. N., and Edelman, G. M., 1971, Immunolgobulin structure: Diversity, gene duplication and domains, in: Progress in Immunology ( B. Amos, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  5. Edelman, G. M., and Gottlieb, P. D., 1970, A gentic marker in variable region of light chain of mouse immunoglobulins, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 67: 1192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eichmann, K., and Kindt, T. J., 1971, The inheritance of individual antigenic specificities of rabbit antibodies to streptococcal carbohydrates, J. Exp. Med. 134: 532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitch, W. M., and Margoliash, E., 1967, Construction of phylogenetic trees, Science 155: 279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart, D. A., Pawlak, L. L., and Nisonoff, A., 1973, Nature of anti-hapten antibodies arising after immune suppression of a set of cross-reactive idiotypic specificities, Eur. J. Immunol. 3: 44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hood, L., and Talmage, D. W., 1970, Mechanism of antibody diversity: Germline basis for variability, Science 168: 325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hood, L., 1973, The generics, evolution and expression of antibody molecules, in: Stadler Symposium, Volume 5, pp. 73–142Google Scholar
  11. Jerne, N. K., 1971, The somatic generation of immune recognition, Eur. J. Immunol. 1: 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lederberg, J., 1959, Genes and antibodies, Science 129: 1649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milstein, C., 1967, Linked groups of residues in immunoglobulin kappa chains, Nature (London) 216: 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weigert, M. G., Cesari, I. M., Yonkovich, S. J., and Cohn, M., 1970, Variability in the lambda light chain sequences of mouse antibody, Nature (London) 228: 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Kindt
    • 1
  • J. Donald Capra
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas Health Science CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations