Advertisement

The Micronucleus Test as an Indicator of Mutagenic Exposure

  • Robert R. Racine
  • Bernhard E. Matter
Part of the Topics in Chemical Mutagenesis book series (TCM, volume 2)

Abstract

The widespread demand for protection against chemical substances in the environment that may damage genetic material emphasizes the need for reliable and comprehensive assay systems for the detection of genotoxic effects. Such effects can be classified in three broad categories, namely (1) gene and point mutations, (2) chromosome mutations, and (3) genome mutations. It is well known that in humans these effects may lead to severe clinical disorders that may be transmissible to future generations if they occur in the germ line. A number of chemical substances that could cause such adverse effects in humans have already been identified by means of experimental work with biological assay systems.

Keywords

Chromosome Aberration Styrene Oxide Chemical Mutagen Micronucleus Test Bone Marrow Smear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. J. Evans, in: Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection (A. Hollaender, ed.), Vol. 4, pp. 1–29, Plenum Press, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. M. Cohen and K. Hirschhorn, in: Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection (A. Hollaender, ed.), Vol. 2, pp. 515–534, Plenum Press, New York (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Brenneke, Strahlenschädigung von Mäuse-und Rattensperma, beobachtet an der Frühentwicklung der Eier, Strahlentherapie 60, 214–238 (1937).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Mather, The experimental determination of the time of chromosome doubling, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 124, 97–106 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. M. Thoday, The effect of ionizing radiations on the broad bean root. Part IX. Chromosome breakage and the lethality of ionizing radiations to the root meristem, Br. J. Radiol. 24, 572–576 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. M. Thoday, The effect of ionizing radiations on the broad bean root. Part IX. (Concluded), Br. J. Radiol. 24, 622–628 (1951).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. B. Russell and W. E. Russell, Pathways of radiation effects in the mother and the embryo, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 19, 50–59 (1954).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. J. Evans, G. J. Neary, and F. S. Williamson, The relative biological efficiency of single doses of fast neutrons and gamma-rays on vicia faba roots and the effect of oxygen. Part II. Chromosome damage: The production of micronuclei, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1, 216–229 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Boiler and W. Schmid, Chemische Mutagenese beim Säuger. Das Knochenmark des Chinesischen Hamsters als in vivo-Testsystem. Hämatologische Befunde nach Behandlung mit Trenimon, Humangenetik 11, 35–54 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. E. Matter and W. Schmid, Trenimon-induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells of six mammalian species, evaluated by the micronucleus test, Mutat. Res. 12, 417–425 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Von Ledebur and W. Schmid, The micronucleus test. Methodological aspects, Mutat. Res. 19, 109–117 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. E. Matter, I. Jaeger, and J. Grauwiler, The relationship between the doses of various chemical mutagens required to induce micronuclei in mouse bone marrow and their lethal doses, Proc. Eur. Soc. Study Drug Toxic. 15, 275–279 (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Schmid, Chemical mutagen testing on in vivo somatic mammalian cells, Agents Actions 3/2, 77–85 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Schmid, The micronucleus test, Mutat. Res. 31, 9–15 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Schmid, in: Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection (A. Hollaender, ed.), Vol. 4, pp. 31–53, Plenum Press, New York (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Smoliar, Cinétique des micronoyaux du rein après irradiation et néphrectomie unilaterale. Effet de la cystamine, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 16, 227–231 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Müller, M. Langauer, R. Rathenberg, F. F. Strasser, and R. Hess, 40. Mikrokerntest sowie Chromosomenuntersuchungen an somatischen und gonosomalen Zellen des Chinesischen Hamsters nach Cyclophosphamidgabe, Verh. Dtsch. Ges. Pathol. 56, 381–384 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. A. Heddle, A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage, Mutat. Res. 18, 187–190 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. J. Roberts and J. E. Sturrock, Enhancement by caffeine of N-methyl-N-nitrosoureainduced mutations and chromosome abberations in Chinese hamster cells, Mutat. Res. 20, 243–255 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. R. Bruce and J. A. Heddle, The mutagenic activity of 61 agents as determined by the micronucleus, Salmonella, and sperm abnormality assays, Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21, 319–334 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Jenssen and C. Ramel, The micronucleus test as part of a short-term mutagenicity program for the prediction of carcinogenicity evaluated by 143 agents tested, Mutat. Res. 75, 191–202 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. E. Matter and D. Wild, in: Comparative chemical mutagenesis (F. J. de Serres and M. D. Shelby, eds.), pp. 657–679, Plenum Press, New York (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. A. Heddle, A. S. Raj, and A. B. Krepinsky, in: Short-Term Tests for Chemical Carcinogens (H. F. Stich and R. H. C. San, eds.), pp. 250–254, Springer, New York (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. A. Heddle, M. Hite, B. Kirkhart, K. Mavournin, J. T. MacGregor, G. W. Newell, and M. F. Salamone, The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity, Mutat. Res. 123, 61–118 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Henry, S. Lupo, and K. T. Szabo, Sex difference in sensitivity to the cytogenetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate in mice demonstrated by the micronucleus test, Mutat. Res. 69, 385–387 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Committee on Toxicology, in: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, Publication 1138, p. 2, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1978).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Salamone, J. Heddle, E. Stuart, and M. Katz, Towards an improved micronucleus test. Studies on 3 model agents, mitomycin C, cyclophosphamide and dimethylbenzanthracene, Mutat. Res. 74, 347–356 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. E. Matter, Failure to detect chromosome damage in bone-marrow cells of mice and Chinese hamsters exposed in vivo to some ergot derivates, J. Int. Med. Res. 4, 382–392 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. A. Kastenbaum and K. O. Bowman, Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies, Mutat. Res. 9, 527–549 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Jenssen and C. Ramel, Factors affecting the induction of micronuclei at low doses of X-rays, MMS and dimethylnitrosamine in mouse erythroblasts, Mutat. Res. 58, 51–65 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Tsuchimoto and B. E. Matter, Comparison of micronucleus test and chromosome examination in detecting potential chromosome mutagens, Mutat. Res. 46, 240 (1977).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Tsuchimoto and B. E. Matter, In vivo cytogenetic screening methods for mutagens, with special reference to the micronucleus test, Arch. Toxicol. 42, 239–248 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. E. Matter and T. Tsuchimoto, Mutagenicity test systems for the detection of chromosome aberrations in vivo, Arch. Toxicol. 46, 89–98 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. S. Raj and J. A. Heddle, Simultaneous detection of chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges. Experience with DNA intercalating agents, Mutat. Res. 78, 253–260 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. F. de Serres and J. Ashby, Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens (Report of the international collaborative program), Elsevier/ North-Holland, Amsterdam (1981).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. J. Cole, N. A. Taylor, J. Cole, and C. F. Arlett, Transplacental effects of chemical mutagens detected by the micronucleus test, Nature 277, 317–318 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. J. Cole, N. A. Taylor, J. Cole, and C. F. Arlett, Short-term tests for transplacentally active carcinogens. I. Micronucleus formation in fetal and maternal mouse erythroblasts, Mutat. Res. 80, 141–157 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. T. MacGregor, C. M. Wehr, and D. H. Gould, Clastogen-induced micronuclei in peripheral blood erythrocytes: The basis of an improved micronucleus test, Environ. Mutagen. 2, 509–514 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Krogh Jensen and M. S. Hiittel, Assessment of the effect of azathioprine on human bone marrow cells in vivo, combining chromosome studies and the micronucleus test, Dan. Med. Bull. 23, 152–154 (1976).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Krogh Jensen, Cytogenetic findings in pernicious anaemia. Comparison between results obtained with chromosome studies and the micronucleus test, Mutat. Res. 45, 249–252 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Krogh Jensen, G. G. Rasmussen, and S. Ingeberg, Cytogenetic studies in patients treated with penicillamine, Mutat. Res. 67, 357–359 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Linnainmaa, T. Meretoja, M. Sorsa, and H. Vainio, Cytogenetic effects of styrene and styrene oxide, Mutat. Res. 58, 277–286 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    T. Ma, A. H. Sparrow, L. A. Schairer, and A. F. Nauman, Effect of 1,2-dibromoethane on meiotic chromosomes of Tradescantia, Mutat. Res. 53, 112–113 (1978).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Countryman and J. Heddle, A true microculture technique for human lymphocytes, Hum. Genet. 35, 197–200 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. Lähdetie and M. Parvinen, Meiotic micronuclei induced by X-rays in early spermatids of the rat, Mutat. Res. 81, 103–115 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. D. Tates, I. Neuteboom, M. Hofker, and L. den Engelse, A micronucleus technique for detecting clastogenic effects of mutagens/carcinogens (DEN, DMN) in hepatocytes of rat liver in vivo, Mutat. Res. 74, 11–20 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    B. E. Matter, Test systems in mutagenicity: the micronucleus test; in: Lectures in Toxicology, number 10 (G. Zbinden, ed.), pp. 1–5, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Racine
    • 1
  • Bernhard E. Matter
    • 1
  1. 1.Preclinical Research, ToxicologySandoz Ltd.BasleSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations