Anomalons, Honey and Glue in Nuclear Collisions

  • M. Gyulassy
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 104)


In these lectures, I will cover three rapidly evolving areas of current research in the field of high energy nuclear collisions. Extensive reviews of additional topics can be found in Refs. 1 and 2. The topics covered here address the following questions:
  1. i.

    Do novel nuclear states exist?

  2. ii.

    Do nuclei flow like honey?

  3. iii.

    Can a quark-gluon plasma be produced?



Free Path Nuclear Matter Baryon Density Longitudinal Growth Nuclear Collision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Nagamiya and M. Gyulassy, in: “Advances in Nuclear Physics” J. Negele, E. Vogt, eds., Plenum, New York (in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. M. Friedlander and H. Heckmann, Lawrence Berkeley Lab report LBL-13864.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. M. Friedlander et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45:1084 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. L. Jain and G. Das, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:305 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. B. Barber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:856 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. M. Friedlander et al., Lawrence Berkeley Lab report LBL-10573.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. F. Bayman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:532 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. P. Balachandran et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:1124 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Boguta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50:148 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. De Rujula et al., Phys. Rev. D17:285 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 10a.
    A. De Rujula et al., D22:227 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. D22:225 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    R. Slansky et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47:887 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    R. Saly et al., Phys. Lett. 115B:239 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    B. Price et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50:566 (1983); W. Heinrich et al., Univ. of Siegen report S-I-82–15.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    A. Casher et al., Phys. Rev. D20:179 (1979).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    E. Kolb et al., UC Santa Barbara report NSF-ITP-81–66.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    A. B. Migdal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50:107 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    M. Gyulassy and W. Greiner, Ann. Phys. 109:485 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A354:395c (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    B. Banerjee, N. K. Glendenning and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A361:326 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    S. Nagamiya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:1780 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    See J. Delorme, H. Toki, W. Weise, in: “Lecture Notes in Physics 137,” H. Arenhövel and A. M. Sarius, eds., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1981).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    M. Soyeur, in: “Proc. Symposium on Neutron Stars,” European Physical Society, Istanbul, (1981).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    J. R. Nix and D. Strottmann, Phys. Rev. C23:2548 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    A. Sandoval et al., Phys. Rev. C21:1321 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 26.
    J. Cugnon, Phys. Rev. C22:1885 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 27.
    H. Stocker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47:1807 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28.
    R. Stock et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44:1243 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 29.
    H. Gutbrod, private communication.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    R. Madey, private communication.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    M. Gyulassy, K. Frankel and E. Remler, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory report LBL-15285.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    P. J. Siemens and J. O. Rasmussen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42:844 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    R. Stock et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49:1236 (1982); and GSI report GSI-82–31.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    H. Stocker et al., Nucl. Phys. A387:205c (1982).Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    H. Stocker, M. Gyulassy and J. Boguta, Phys. Lett. 103B:269 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 36.
    M. Gyulassy, K. A. Frankel and H. Stocker, Phys. Lett. 110B:185 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 37.
    J. Cugnon, J. Knoll, C. Riedel and Y. Yariv, Phys. Lett. 109B: 167 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 38.
    H. H. Gutbrod et al., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory report LBL-14980.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    H. Stroebele et al., GSI report GSI-82–32; D. Beavis et al., to be published.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    H. Stocker et al., GSI report GSI-82–8.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    J. Engels, F. Karsch and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. 113B:398 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 42.
    I. Montvay and E. Pietarinen, Phys. Lett. 110B:148 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 42a.
    I. Montvay and E. Pietarinen, 115B:151 (1982).Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    See contribution of H. Satz in these proceedings.Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    M. Gyulassy, in: “Quark Matter Formation and Heavy Ion Collisions,” M. Jacob and H. Satz, eds., World Scientific Pub. Co., Singapore (1982).Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    J. E. Elias et al., Phys. Rev. D22:13 (1980).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 46.
    A. S. Goldhaber, Nature 275:114 (1978); W. Busza and A. S. Goldhaber, Stony Brook report ITB-SB-82–22.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 47.
    E. L. Feinberg, Phys. Rep. 5:237 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 47a.
    J. Koplik and A. H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D12.–3638 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 47b.
    A. S. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35:748 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 48.
    R. Anishetty, P. Koehler and L. McLerran, Phys. Rev. 22D:2793 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. 49.
    S. J. Brodsky, in: “Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Ultra-Relativistic Nuclear Collisions,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory report LBL-8957; see also A. Bialas ibid. Google Scholar
  54. 50.
    UA5 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. 107B:315 (1981).Google Scholar
  55. 51.
    JACEE Collaboration, in: “Proceedings of Workshop on Very High Energy Cosmic Ray Interactions,” Univ. Penn., Philadelphia (1982).Google Scholar
  56. 52.
    I. Otterlund and E. Stenlund, Physica Scripta 22:15 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 53.
    M. Gyulassy, L. McLerran and H. Satz, to be published.Google Scholar
  58. 54.
    J. Rafelski and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:1066 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 55.
    K. Kajantie and H. I. Mietinnen, Z. Phys. C9:341 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 56.
    L. van Hove, CERN report TH-3391.Google Scholar
  61. 57.
    J. Iwai, N. Suzuki and Y. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 55: 1537 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 58.
    J. Iwai et al., Nuovo Cim. 69A:295 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 59.
    M. Crawford and D. N. Schramm, Nature 298:538 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 60.
    J. D. Bjorken, Fermilab report Pub.-82/44-THY; K. Kajantie andGoogle Scholar
  65. L. McLerran, Univ. Helsinki report HU-TFT-82–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Gyulassy
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations