Summary
Fuel cell power plant systems operating on coal-derived fuels have the potential to satisfy a broad range of applications. The intent of this chapter is to place this fuel cell system potential in perspective. First, discussions of fuel cell history and basic concepts are presented to set the stage for a general understanding of why much effort has been expended on fuel cell research and development. However, the fuel cell’s initial success in the space effort led to an overselling of its commercial potential and an underselling of the efforts that would be required to enable fuel cells to fulfill this potential.
Second, the results of a series of systems studies in which the projected performance and cost of low- and/or high-temperature fuel cell power plant systems are reviewed. The results indicate that the low-temperature phosphoric acid fuel cell system and the high-temperature molten carbonate (M.C.) and solid oxide (S.O.) fuel cell systems hold the greatest promise of meeting the commercial terrestrial needs. Potential attractive applications cover both utility and nonutility systems where they can function either simply as suppliers of electricity or as suppliers of both electrical and thermal energy.
High-temperature M.C. and S.O. fuel cell power plants could be an attractive generating option due to their inherent efficiency (due in part to utilization of high-quality waste heat) coupled with their benign environmental characteristics. In particular, M.C. and S.O. power plants are being considered for application as baseload central station generators integrated with coal gasifiers and a bottoming cycle. In addition, the M.C. system is being developed as an intermediate duty, dispersed generator. Because of their capacity for generating high-quality waste heat, the M.C. and S.O. systems are also attractive candidates for industrial cogeneration.
The parametric sensitivity analyses conducted in the systems studies, which are discussed in this review, have helped to establish the emphasis of future fuel cell system development efforts. Reliability, performance, and cost are the general requirements that every fuel cell power plant system must satisfy. This is considered in more specific terms in a discussion of technical and commercial readiness of each of the systems. Such considerations as increased tolerance to coal gas impurities, particularly sulfur and halides, sustained fuel cell stack performance requirements and developing configurations that lend themselves to low-cost manufacturing are among the key development challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. D. Little Report, 1978, Assessment of industrial applications for on-site fuel cell cogeneration systems, NASA CR-135429, work performed for NASA under contract No. NAS3–20818, September.
A. D. Little Report, 1980, Study of component technologies for fuel cell on-site integrated systems, work performed for NASA under contract No. DEN3–121, December.
Austin, L. G., 1967, Fuel cells—A review of government sponsored research, 1950–1964, NASA SP-120.
Baur, E., and Ehrenberg, H., 1912, Z. Electrochem. 18:1002.
Baur, E., and Tobler, J., 1933, Z. Electrochem. 39:169.
Baur, E., Peterson, A., and Fullemann, G., 1916, Z. Electrochem. 22:409.
Baur, E., Treadwell, W., and Trumpler, G., 1921, Z. Electrochem. 27:199.
Benjamin, T. G., Camara, E. H., and Marionowski, L. G., 1980, Handbook of fuel cell performance, prepared for DOE under Contract EC-77-C-03–1545.
Bowman, R. M., Bassam, J. J., Kaung, C. L., and Blurton, K. F., 1980, Industrial energy conservation with the natural gas fueled molten carbonate fuel cell, Extended Abstracts, National Fuel Cell Seminar, San Diego, California, July 14–16, p. 66.
Broers, G. J. J., 1958, High temperature galvanic cells, Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Burns, R. K., Choo, Y. K., and Simons, S. N., 1980, Congeneration technology alternatives study, results for phosphoric acid and molten carbonate fuel cells, Extended Abstracts, National Fuel Cell Seminar, San Diego, California, July 14–16, p. 61.
Burns and McDonnell Report, 1979, Feasibility of cogeneration application of a 4.8 MW fuel cell power plant at a Santa Clara, California, paper mill, Final report, Performed for DOE under DOE Contract ET-78-C-08–2189, July.
Cairns, E. J., and Mclnerey, E. J., 1967, J. Electrochem. Soc. 114:980.
Crow, B. J., 1973, Fuel cells, NASA SP-5115.
Farooque, M., 1982, Full scale phosphoric acid cell stack technology development, 7th Quarterly Report, July. Work performed under NASA DEN3–205 by ERC.
Fickett, A. P., Mclntyre, J. D., Sirinivasan, S., and Will, F. G., 1977, Electrode Materials and Processes for Energy Conversion, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, p. 546.
Grove, W. R., 1839, On voltaic series and the combination of gases by platinum, Phil. Mag., S. 3, 14:127.
Grove, W. R., 1842, On gaseous voltaic battery, Phil. Mag., S. 3, 21:417.
Grove, W. R., 1847, The Correlation of Physical Forces, 1st ed., Longmans, Green, London.
Grove, W. R., 1874, The Correlation of Physical Forces, 6th ed., Longmans, Green, London.
GE Report, 1976, Energy conversion alternatives study (ECAS) Phase I Final Report, NASA CR-134948.
GE Report, 1977, Energy conversion alternatives study (ECAS) Phase 2 Final Report, NASA CR-134949.
GE Report, 1980, Cogeneration technology alternatives study (CTAS), Vol. II, Summary Report, NASA CR 159765; Volumes II-VI, NASA CR-159766–159770.
GE Report, 1981, Fuel cell power plant integrated systems evaluation, EPRI EM-1670, Work performed under EPRI Contract 1085–1, January.
Gilbert/Commonwealth Report, 1980, Feasibility Study—Fuel cell cogeneration in a water pollution control facility, Vols. 1 and 2, Performed for DOE under DOE Contract DE-AC03–78-ET-12431, February.
Haber, F., 1905, Z. Electrochem. 12:415.
Haber, F., and Foster, G., 1906, Z. Anorg, Chem. 51:289.
Haber, F., and Fleischmann, 1906, Z. Anorg. Chem. 51:245.
Haber, F., and Moser, A., 1905, Z. Electrochem. 11:593.
Holmes and Narver Report, 1980, Feasibility study—Fuel cell cogeneration at the Anheuser-Busch Los Angeles Brewery, performed for DOE under DOE Contract ET-78-C-03–2190, February.
Howard, A., 1945, Chap. 25, in: Chemistry of Coal Utilization (H. Lowry, ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Jacques, W., 1896, Harper’s Mag. 94:144 (Dec. 1896-May 1897).
KTI Report, 1982, Assessment of a Coal Gasification Fuel Cell System for Utility Application. Work performed for EPRI under Contract RP1041–8, EM-2387, May.
Kunz, H. R., Luczak, F. J., and Grover, G. A., 1980, Optimization of carbon-supported platinum for fuel cell electrodes, work performed for U.S. Army under contract DAAK70–79-G-0151, final report.
Liebhafsky, H., and Cairns, E., 1968, Fuel Cells and Fuel Batteries, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Mathtech Report, 1979, An analysis of the application of fuel cells in dual energy use systems, work performed under Contract 1135–1, EM-981, Vols. 1 and 2, February.
Mathtech Report, 1980, Study of fuel cell on-site integrated energy systems in residential/commercial applications, NASA CR-165144, October.
McAllister, A. J., 1981, Non-noble catalysts and catalyst supports for phosphoric acid fuel cells, work performed for NASA under Interagency Agreement C-46229-D, final report.
Mond, L., and Langer, Co., 1898, Proc. R. Soc. (London) 46:296.
NASA Report, 1976, Comparative evaluation of phase I results from the energy conversion alternatives study (ECAS), NASA TMX-71855.
NASA Report, 1977, Evaluation of phase 2 conceptual designs and implementation assessment resulting from the energy conversion alternatives study, NASA TMX-73515.
NASA Report, 1980, Cogeneration technology alternatives study (CTAS), Vol. I, Summary, NASA TMX-81400; Vol. II, NASA TMX-81401; work performed for DOE under Interagency Agreement EC-77-A-31–1062.
Ostwald, W., 1894, Z. Electrochem. 1:122.
PSE&G Report, 1978, Economic assessment of the utilization of fuel cells in electric utility systems, work performed for EPRI, EPRI FM-336, final report, November.
Rohr, F. J., 1977, Proceedings of the workshop on high temperature solid oxide fuel cells, Brookhaven National Lab, Upton, New York, May 5–6.
Ross, P., 1980, Work performed for EPRI, EPRI-1553.
Stonehart, P., and MacDonald, J. P., 1979, Work performed for EPRI, EPRI EM-1669.
TRW Report, 1979, Feasibility study for industrial cogeneration fuel cell application, performed by TRW Energy Systems Group, Energy Systems Management Division for DOE under DOE Contract DE-AC-03–78-CS-40227, November.
TVA Report, 1981, TVA/OP/EDT-81, June.
UTC Report, 1976, Energy conversion alternatives study—ECAS—Phase 2 final report, NASA CR-134955.
UTC Report, 1977, On-site fuel cell resource conservation in industrial process applications, FCR-0439, work performed for U.S. Energy Research & Development Administration by UTC and Gordian Associates, August.
UTC Report, 1978, Improvement of fuel cell technology base, work performed for DOE under DE-AC-03–79ET11301, final report.
UTC Report, 1980, Cogeneration technology alternatives study (CTAS), Vol. 1, summary report, NASA CR-159759, Vols. II-VI, NASA CR-159760–159764.
UTC Report, 1981, FCG-1 power plant preliminary specification, FCS-3519, prepared under EPRI Agreement RP 1777–1, July.
Walsh, F., 1982, Organometallic catalysts for primary phosphoric acid fuel cell, 2nd quarterly report, work performed under NASA contract DEN3–206 by ECO Division, Tracer Technologies, May.
Warshay, M., 1976, Fuel cell power plants, NASA TMX-71855:233.
Warshay, M., 1978, ECAS phase I fuel cell results, J. Energy 2:46.
Warshay, M., and Burns, R. K., 1977, Molten carbonate fuel cell/steam system, NASA TMX-73515:247.
Warshay, M., and King, J. M., 1977, ECAS phase 2 molten carbonate fuel cell power plant conceptual design and implementation assessment, extended abstracts, National Fuel Cell Seminar, Boston, Massachusetts, June 21–23.
Warshay, M., Prokopius, P. R., Simons, S. N., and King, R. B., 1981, Status of commercial phosphoric acid fuel cell system development, AIAA-81–0396, AIAA 19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, St. Louis, Missouri, January 12–15.
Weaver, R. D., Leach, S. C., Bayce, G., and Nanis, L., 1979, Direct electrochemical generation of electricity from coal, work performed for DOE under contract EY-76-C-03–0115.
Westinghouse Report, 1976, Energy conversion alternatives study—ECAS—Phase I final report. NASA CR-134941.
Westinghouse Report, 1977, Energy conversion alternatives study—ECAS—Phase 2 final report, NASA CR-134942.
Westinghouse Report, 1980, Thin, F. cell battery/fuel cell power generating system, final report of the continuation contract; work performed for DOE under contract DE-AC-03793ET11305, June 30.
Westinghouse Report, 1981, The design, cost and benefit of an industrial cogeneration system using a high temperature solid oxide fuel cell generator, topical report covering Task 5; work performed for DOE under contract DE-AC-0379ET11305, February 25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warshay, M. (1984). Fuel Cell Power Plant Systems. In: Cooper, B.R., Ellingson, W.A. (eds) The Science and Technology of Coal and Coal Utilization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4580-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4580-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4582-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4580-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive