Skip to main content

Plutonium and Bombs

  • Chapter
Before it’s Too Late
  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

The very existence of plutonium is often viewed as the work of the devil.* As the most important ingredient in nuclear bombs, it may someday be responsible for killing untold millions of people, although there are substitutes for it in that role if it did not exist. If it gets into the human body, it is highly toxic. On the other hand, its existence is the only guarantee we have that this world can obtain all the energy it will ever needforever at a reasonable price. In fact I am personally convinced that citizens of the distant future will look upon it as one of God’s greatest gifts to humanity. Between these extremes of good and evil is the fact that if our nuclear power program continues to be run as it is today, the existence of plutonium will have no relevance to it except as a factor in technical calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. F. R. Best, M. J. Driscoll: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 34, 380 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. L. Cohen: “Breeder Reactors—A Renewable Energy Source,” American Journal of Physics, 51, 75 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Avery, H. A. Bethe, “Breeder Reactors: The Next Generation,” in Nuclear Power: Both Sides, M. Kaku and J. Trainer (eds.) ( Norton, New York, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. G. Ayers, etal. t LMFBR Program Review, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (1978); Report to the Task Forces to the LMFBR Review Steering Committee, Energy Research and Development Administration, April 6 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Review of National Breeder Reactor Program, January (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Wilson: “Report on the Safety of a Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. B. Yasinsky (ed.): “Position Papers on Major Issues Associated with the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor,” Westinghouse Electric Corp., Madison, Pennsylvania (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milton R. Benjamin: Washington Post, July 20 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Atomic-Industrial Forum: “Light Water Reactor Fuel Cycles—An Economic Comparison of the Recycle and Throw-away Alternatives,” February (1981). This presents analyses by six different groups.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Lesch: “World Reprocessing Facilities,” Worldwide Nuclear Power, January (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shelby T. Brewer: “Letter to Recipients of Worldwide Nuclear Power,” dated March 4 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Meyer, S. K. Loyalka, W. E. Nelson, R. W. Williams: “The Homemade Bomb Syndrome,” Nuclear Safety, 18, 427 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Starr, E. Zebroski: “Nuclear Power and Weapons Proliferation,” American Power Conference, April (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. McPhee, The Curve of Binding Energy, ( Ballantine Books, New York, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Safeguarding a Domestic Mixed Oxide Industry Against a Hypothetical Subnational Threat,” NUREG-0414, May (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Regulatory Guide 5.55: Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Fuel Cycle Facilities” (1978); also “Regulatory Guide 5.54: Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Nuclear Power Plants” (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Regulatory Guide 5.56: Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Transportation” (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Willrich, T. B. Taylor: Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards (Ballinger Publ. Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. H. Schmidt, D. Bodansky: The Energy Controversy: The Fight over Nuclear Power ( Albion Press, San Francisco, 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. L. Cohen: “Plutonium—How Great is the Terrorist Threat,” Nuclear Engi-neering International, February (1977). The quote from Kinderman is given there. It was taken from a book, but I cannot recall the name of the latter.

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. “Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) Safeguards Program, Background Statement, ” March 10 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Nader: speech at Lafayette College, Spring (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Task Group on Lung Dynamics, “Deposition and Retention Models for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract,” Health Physics, 12, 173 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Academy of Sciences Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Ra-diation (BEIR), “Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation” (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), “Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation” (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. L. Cohen: “Hazards from Plutonium Toxicity,” Health Physics, 32, 359 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The Medical Research Council, The Toxicity of Plutonium (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1975); C. W. Mays, “Discussion of Plutonium Toxicity,” in R. G. Sachs (ed.), National Energy Issues—How Do We Decide (Ballinger Publ. Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980 ); C. W. Mays, “Risk Estimates for Liver,” in “Critical Issues in Setting Radiation Dose Limits,” NCRP (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. J. Bair: “Toxicology of Plutonium,” Advances in Radiation Biology, 4, 225 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. H. Rothchild, Tomorrow’s Weapons ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964 ).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. F. Park, W. J. Bair, R. H. Busch: “Progress in Beagle Dog Studies with Transuranium Elements at Battelle-Northwest,” Health Physics, 22, 803 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. R. Tamplin, T. B. Cochran: “Radiation Standards for Hot Particles,” Natural Resources Defense Council Report, 1974. Also, “Petition to Amend Radiation Protection Standards as They Apply to Hot Particles,” submitted to EPA and AEC, Feb. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Academy of Sciences, “Health Effects of Alpha Emitting Particles in the Respiratory Tract,” Environmental Protection Agency Document EPA 520/ 4–76–013 (1976); National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), “Alpha Emitting Particles in Lungs,” NCRP Report No. 46 (1975); United Kingdom National Radiological Protection Board, Report R-29 and Bulletin No. 8 (1974); W. J. Bair, C. R. Richmond, and B. W. Wachholz, “A Radiobiological Assessment of the Spatial Distribution of Dose from Plutonium,” U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report WASH-1320 (1974); See also The Medical Research Council, Ref. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. L. Voelz, “What We Have Learned About Plutonium from Human Data,” Health Physics, 29, 551 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. W. Gofman: “The Cancer Hazard from Inhaled Plutonium,”Committee for Nuclear Responsibility Report CNR 1975-1, reprinted in Congressional Record— Senate 31, July (1975), p. 14610.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. W. Albert etal., Archives of Environmental Health, 18, 738 (1969); 30, 361 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. W. J. Bair: “Review of Reports by J. W. Gofman on Inhaled Plutonium,” Battelle Northwest Lab. Report BNWL-2067; C. R. Richmond, “Review of John W. Gofman’s Report on Health Hazards from Inhaled Plutonium,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL-TM-5257 (1975); J. W. Healy etal., “A Brief Review of the Plutonium Lung Cancer Estimates by John W. Gofman,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Report LA-UR-75-1779 (1975); M. B. Snipes etal., “Review of John Gofman’s Papers on Lung Cancer Hazard from Inhaled Plutonium,” Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Report LF-51 UC- 48 (1975); “Comments Prepared by D. Grahn,” Argonne National Laboratory (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Nader: Family Health, Jan. (1977), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, “Meterology and Atomic Energy,” pp. 97ff (1968). This gives the calculational procedures used in Ref. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. Stewart: in The Resuspension of Particulate Material from Surfaces, B. R. Fish (ed.) (Pergamon Press, New York, 1964); W. H. Langham, Los Alamos Scientific Lab Report LA-4756 (1971); L. R. Anspaugh, P. L. Phelps, N. C. Kennedy, and H. C. Booth, Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Behavior of Radionuclides Released in the Nuclear Industry, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. R. McLendon etal.: International Atomic Energy Agency Document IAEA- SM-199/85, p. 347 (1976)—Savannah River Plant; R. C. Dahlman, E. A. Bondietti, and L. D. Eyman, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division Publication 870 (1976)—Oak Ridge; F. W. Wicker, Colorado State University Report C00-1156–80 (1975—Rocky Flats, Colorado; E. M. Romney, A. Wallace, R. O. Gilbert, and J. E. Kinnear, International Atomic Energy Agency Document IAEA-SM-199/73, p. 479 (1976)—Eniwetok.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Gofman: National Forum, Summer (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. L. Cohen: “Plutonium Containment,” Health Physics, 40, 76 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, 40, 23420 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  44. U.S. Atomic Energy Agency, “Plutonium and Other Transuranic Elements: Sources, Environmental Distribution, and Biomedical Effects,” Document WASH-1359 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. R. Lamarsh: Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  46. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Report of the Task Group on Reference Man, ICRP Publication 23 ( Pergamon Press, New York, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  47. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Recommendations of ICRP, ICRP Publication 26 ( Pergamon Press, New York, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Bernard L. Cohen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, B.L. (1983). Plutonium and Bombs. In: Before it’s Too Late. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4577-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4577-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4579-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4577-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics