Hazards of High-Level Radioactive Waste—The Great Myth

  • Bernard L. Cohen


The fourth major reason for public misunderstanding of nuclear power is a grossly unjustified fear of the hazards from radioactive waste. Even people whom I know to be intelligent and knowledgeable about energy issues have told me that their principal reservation about use of nuclear power is the disposal of radioactive waste. Often called an “unsolved problem,” many consider it to be the Achilles’ heel of nuclear power. Seven states now have laws prohibiting construction of nuclear power plants until the waste disposal issue is settled. On the other hand there is general agreement among those scientists involved with waste management that radioactive waste disposal is a rather trivial technical problem. Having it as one of my principal research specialties over the past seven years, I am firmly convinced that this radioactive waste from nuclear power operations represents less of a health hazard than the waste from any other large technological industry. Clearly there is a long and complex story to tell.


Radioactive Waste Coal Burning Nuclear Waste Chemical Carcinogen Arsenic Trioxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    W. C. Clark: Carbon Dioxide Review-1982 ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Senate Committee on Public Works, “Air Quality and Stationary Source Emission Controls” (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. G. Walther: “A Rating of the Major Air Pollutants and Their Sources by Effects,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 22, 352 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Wilson, S. D. Colome, J. D. Spengler, D. G. Wilson: Health Effects of Fossil Fuel Burning (Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calculation by author, unpublished.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. L. Cohen: “The Role of Radon in Comparisons of Environmental Effects of Nuclear Energy, Coal Burning, and Phosphate Mining,” Health Physics, 40, 19 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. G. Croff, C. W. Alexander: “Decay Characteristics of Once-Through LWR and LMFBR Spent Fuels, High Level Wastes, and Fuel Assembly Structural Materials Wastes,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-7431 (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reference 4 gives the risk from sulfur dioxide (S02) as 3.5 x 105/year for 1 microgram S02 per meter3 of air. An average person inhales 7000 m3 of air per year so this corresponds to inhaling 7000 xg, or 0.007 g of S02. “The deaths per gram ofS02 are then 3.5 x 10”5/0.007 = 0.005. An average coal-burning plant produces 3 x 108 g of S02 per day; this could then cause (3 x 108 x 0.005 =) 1.5 million deaths if it were all inhaled by people.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See Fig. 17 below, which gives the effects from eating all the waste produced in one year. This number must be divided by the number of days per year to obtain the effects from one day.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. L. Cohen: “Ocean Dumping of Radioactive Waste,” Nuclear Technology, 47, 163 (1980). Some of the numbers quoted in that paper have been changed due to later data but these are incorporated into the results quoted here.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter and Sulfur Oxides,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, February (1981); “Air Quality Criteria for Oxides of Nitrogen,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report, June (1980).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Assessment Document for Po- lycyclic Organic Matter, Report EPA-600/9-79-008 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. L. Cohen: “Effects of ICRP-30 and BEIR-III on Hazard Estimates for High Level Radioactive Waste,” Health Physics, 42, 133 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Council of Environmental Quality, Environmental Quality-1972, Washington, D.C. (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    U.S. Department of Energy, Technology for Commercial Radioactive Waste Management, Document DOE/ET-0028 (1979).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. E. Mendel etal: “Thermal and Radiation Effects on Borosilicate Glass,” Battelle Northwest Lab Document BNWL-SA-5534 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    “Environmental Aspects of Commercial Radioactive Waste Management,” U.S. Department of Energy Document DOE/ET-0029, May (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Task Group on Lung Dynamics, “Deposition and Retention Models for Internal Dosimetry of the Human Respiratory Tract,” Health Physics, 12, 173 (1966).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    These are reviewed by C. M. Koplik, M. F. Kaplan, B. Ross, “The Safety of Repositories for Highly Radioactive Waste,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 54,269 (1982); and Interagency Review Group, Report to the President, U.S. Department of Energy Report TID-29442 (1978).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. L. Cohen, “High Level Waste from Light Water Reactors,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 49, 1 (1977); The plans for waste burial have changed somewhat since that time including a threefold dilution of the waste in glass. This is taken into account in the numbers given here.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. L. Cohen: “Effects of Recent Neptunium Studies on High Level Waste Hazard Assessments,” Health Physics 44, 567 (1983).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. E. Christensen:“Toxic Substances List,” U.S. Department of HEW (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. A. Reuppen, M. A. Molecke, R. S. Glass: “Titanium Utilization in Long Term Nuclear Waste Storage,” Sandia National Lab Report, SAND81-2466 (1981).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. F. Kaplan: “Characterization of Weathered Glass by Analyzing Ancient Ar-tifacts,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, C. J. M. Northrup (ed.) ( Plenum Press, New York, 1980 ).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. F. Merritt: Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report AECL-5317 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. C. Claibourne, F. Gera: “Potential Containment Failure Mechanisms and Their Consequences at a Radioactive Waste Repository in Bedded Salt in New Mexico,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-TM-4639 (1974).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. J. Schneider, A. M. Piatt: “High Level Radioactive Waste Management Alternatives,” Battelle Northwest Laboratory Report BNWL-1900 (1974).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. L. Cohen, “Analysis, Critique, and Re-evaluation of High Level Waste Re-pository Water Intrusion Scenario Studies,” Nuclear Technology, 48, 63 (1980).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. M. Garrels and F. T. McKenzie, Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks ( Norton Co., New York, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cf. Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    National Safety Council, “Accident Facts-1976,” Chicago (1976).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. A. Witherspoon, N. G. W. Cook, J. E. Gale: “Progress with Field Investigations at Stripa,” Lawrence Berkeley Lab Report LBL-10559 (1980).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation (ONWI), “The Status of Borehole Plugging and Shaft Sealing for Geologic Isolation of Radioactive Waste,” ONWI-15, Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, Ohio (1979); Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Repository Sealing Field Testing Workshop, ONWI-239 (1980); D. M. Roy, M. W. Grutzeck, and P. H. Licastro, Evalution of Cement Borehold Plug Longevity, ONWI-30 (1979).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, “Scientific Bases for Identification of Potential Carcinogens and Estimation of Risks ”Federal Register, 44,39858 (1979). See page 39873. See also Federal Register, 40, 28242; 41, 21402; 43, 25658; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emission Standards for Identifying, Assessing, and Regulating Airborne Substances Posing a Risk of Cancer,” Federal Register, 44, 58642, 1979 (see page 58649); U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, “Identification, Classification and Regulation of Potential Occupational Carcinogens,” Federal Register, 45, 5002 (1980).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. L. Cohen: “Long Term Consequences of the Linear No Threshold Dose-Response Relationship for Chemical Carcinogens,” Risk Analysis, 1, 4, 267 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carcinogen Assessment Group, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Prelim-inary Risk Assessment on Beryllium” (1979); Carcinogen Assessment Group, “Summary and Conclusions Regarding Carcinogenicity of Chromium” (1979); Carcinogen Assessment Group, “Preliminary Risk Assessment on Nickel” (1979); Carcinogen Assessment Group, “Final Risk Assessment on Arsenic” (1980); Car cinogen Assessment Group, “Assessment of Carcinogenic Risk from Population Exposure to Cadmium in the Ambient Air” (1978).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), “Report of the Task Group on Reference Man,” ICRP Publication No. 23 (1975).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Cavallaro, A. W. Deurbrouck, H. Shultz, G. A. Gibbon: “Washability and Analytical Evalution of Potential Pollution from Trace Elements in Coal,” Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-600/7-78–038, March (1978); H. J. Gluskoter, “Trace Elements in Coal; Occurrence and Distribution,” EPA Report EPA-600/7-77-064 (1977); C. T. Ford, “Evaluation of the Effect of Coal Cleaning on Fugitive Elements,” Bituminous Coal Research Lab Draft Report L-1082 (1980).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    B. L. Cohen: “Health Effects of Radon from Coal Burning,” Health Physics, 42, 725 (1982).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. Masser: “Low Cost Structure for Photovoltaic Arrays,” Sandia Laboratory Report, SAND-79-7006 (1979).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. D. Moskowitz etal.: “Photovoltaic Energy Technologies: Health and Envi-ronmental Effects Document,” Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL- 51284 (1980).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    B. L. Cohen, “Discounting in Assessment of Future Radiation Effects,” Health Physics (in press).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. M. Axtell, S. J. Cutler, M. H. Myers: “End Results in Cancer,” NIH Publication 73 - 272 (1973).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    S. Homer, The History of Interest Rates (Rutgers University Press, New Bruns-wick, New Jersey, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S. J. Mushkin: Biomedical Research: Costs and Benefits (Ballinger Publ. Co., New York, 1979 ).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. Auster, I. Leveson, D. Sarachek: “The Production of Health,” Journal of Human Resources 4, 411 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Brodsky, Handbook of Radiation Measurement and Protection, Vol. 1 ( CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. 1978 ).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection), “Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers,” ICRP Publication 30 (1979).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    National Academy of Sciences Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Ra-diation, “The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Rsdiation,” Washington, D.C. (1980).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D. E. White, J. D. Hein, G. A. Waring: “Chemical Composition of Subsurface Waters,” Chap. F in “Data of Geochemistry,” U.S. Geological Survey (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bernard L. Cohen 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard L. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations