Atomic Physics 8 pp 415-430 | Cite as

# Light Scattering as a Probe for Atomic Interactions

## Abstract

In this talk we should like to describe some recent work on the scattering of light by atomic and molecular collisions.^{1–8} This work, in our opinion, offers the prospect of a rather direct technique for studying the mechanisms of heavy particle collisions and reactions. We should also like to show that knowledge of such mechanisms, as well as being interesting in its own right, has important consequences for the field of laser assisted and modified collisions. Let us consider to begin with a conventional atomic or molecular crossed beam experiment where, for the sake of discussion, we suppose that we can specify all the relevant ingoing states of the colliding partners: translational and internal energies, spin, etc. Let us suppose that we can also measure all the corresponding quantities for the final or product states. If we have a ground state to ground state scattering problem with a single open channel there are well-established inversion procedures.^{9} For a multichannel problem, i.e. one where several asymptotic states are accessible, inversion is rarely possible. It may, in some cases, be possible to calculate an “ab initio potential” and do full quantal calculations; more often, however, we are forced to consider models of the interaction between the collision partners and consider which model fits the data best. It would, of course, be most advantageous if we could obtain some information more directly about the collision complex rather than have to be content with asymptotic information which may not tie down the form of the potential very well.

## Keywords

Interatomic Potential Internuclear Separation Collision Complex Intense Laser Field Modify Collision## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.K. Burnett, J. Cooper, R. J. Ballagh and E. W. Smith, Phys. Rev. A 22:2205 (1980); K. Burnett and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 22:2027 (1980); K. Burnett and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 22: 2044 (1980).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 2.S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 71:2884 (1979); Y. Rabin, D. Grimbert and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 26: 271 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.G. Nienhuis, Physica 93c:393–407 (1978); J. Phys. B 15: 535–550 (1982).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.P. Thomann, K. Burnett and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45: 1326 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. Voslamber and J. B. Yelnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41: 1233 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. Ben-Reuven and Y. Rabin, Phys. Rev. A 19: 2056 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.F. H. Mies, Quantum theory of atomic collisions in intense laser fields, in: “Theoretical Chemistry: Advances and Perspectives,” Vol. 8, D. Henderson, ed., Academic Press, New York (1981); T. F. George, J. Phys. Chem. 86:10 (1982).Google Scholar
- 8.Kai-shue Lam and T. F. George, J. Chem. Phys. 76:3396 (1982); T. F. George., Theory of molecular rate processes in the presence of intense laser fields, in: Chemical and Bio-chemical Applications of Lasers, Vol. IV, C. B. Moore, ed., Academic Press, New York (1979).Google Scholar
- 9.H. Pauly, Elastic scattering cross sections. I: Spherical potentials, in: “Atom-Molecule Collision Theory, A Guide for the Experimentalist,” R. B. Bernstein, ed., Plenum, New York (1980).Google Scholar
- 10.R. J. LeRoy, Applications of Bohr quantization in diatomic molecule spectroscopy, in; Semiclassical Methods in Molecular Scattering and Spectroscopy, M. S. Child, ed., N.A.T.O. Advanced Study Institutes Series (Series C), Reidel, New York, (19).Google Scholar
- 11.R. E. M. Hedges, D. L. Drummond and A. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A. 6: 1519 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.H. G. Kuhn, Phil. Mag. 18:987 (1934); Proc. Roy. Soc. A 158: 212 (1937).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.A. Jablonski, Acta Phys. Polon. 6:371 (1937); 7:196 (1938); Phys. Rev. 68: 78 (1945).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.J. L. Carlsten, A. Szöke and M. G. Raymer, Phys. Rev. A 15: 1029 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J. V. McGinley, Thesis, Oxford University (1981).Google Scholar
- 16.M. G. Raymer, J. L. Carlsten and G. Pichler, J. Phys. B 12: L119 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P. Ewart, A. I. Ferguson S. V. O’Leary, Optics Commun. 40:147 (1981); P. Ewart and S. V. O’Leary (1982), to be published; M. Dagenais, Phys. Rev. A 24:1404 (1981); Y. Prior, A. R. Bogdan, M. Dagenais and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46: 111 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J. Cooper, “Why half a collision is better than a whole one,” (Invited talk), in: Sixth International Conference on Spectral Line Shapes, K. Burnett, ed., de Gruyter, Berlin (in press).Google Scholar
- 19.P. Julienne, “Non-adiabatic effects in line broadening,” (Invited talk), in: Sixth International Conference on Spectral Line Shapes, K. Burnett, ed., de Gruyter, Berlin (in press).Google Scholar
- 20.J. C. White, Opt. Lett. 242 (1981); M. H. Nayfeh and G. B. Hillard, Phys. Rev. A 24:1409 (1981); L. I. Gudzenko and S. I. Yakovlenko, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 62:1686 (1972) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 35:877 (1972)]; S. E. Harris., in: “Tunable Lasers and Applications,” S. Mooradian, T. Jaeger and P. Stoketh., Springer, New York (1976), p. 193; S. E. Harris., Laser induced collisional energy transfer, in: Atomic Physics 7, D. Kleppner., Plenum, New York (1981); P. L. deVries, C. Chang, T. F. George, B. Laskowski, J. R. Stallcop, Phys. Rev. A 22:545 (1980).Google Scholar
- 21.A. Gallagher, The absorption and emission of radiation by the collision complex, in: “Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions,” S. Datz, ed., North Holland, Amsterdam (1982), pp. 403–411.Google Scholar
- 22.Y. Rabin and P. Hering, contributed paper European Conference on Atomic Physics, April 6–10, 1981, Ruprecht-Karls- Universität, Heidelberg, EPS Conference Abstracts Volume 5A, Part 11; T. Lukasik and S. C. Wallace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47: 240 (1981).Google Scholar
- 23.P. Arrowsmith, F. E. Bartoszek, S. H. Bly, T. Carrington, Jr., P. E. Charters and J. C. Polanyi, J. Chem. Phys. 73:11,4895 (1980); P. Hering, P. R. Brooks, R. F. Curl, Jr., R. S. Judson and R. S. Lowe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44: 687 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.K. Burnett, J. Cooper, P. D. Kleiber and A. Ben-Reuven, Phys. Rev. A 25: 1345–1357 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Y. Rabin and A. Ben-Reuven, J. Phys. B 13: 2011 (1980).Google Scholar
- 26.S. Reynaud and C. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, “Dressed atom approach to collisional redistribution,” J. Physique (in press).Google Scholar
- 27.P. D. Kleiber, J. Cooper, K. Burnett, C. V. Kunasz and M. G. Raymer, “Theory of time dependent intense field collisional fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. A (submitted).Google Scholar
- 28.P. D. Kleiber, K. Burnett and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47: 22, 1595 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.J. C. Light and A. SzSke, Phys. Rev. A 1363 (1978).Google Scholar
- 30.J. Szudy and W. E. Baylis, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 15: 641 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.A. M. Bonch-Bruevich, T. A. Vartanyan and V. V. Khromov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 78:538 (1980) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 51 (1980)]; T. A. Vartanyan, Yu. N. Maksimu, S. G. Przhibelskii and V. V. Khromov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 29: 281 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 32.E. W. Schmid and H. Ziegelmann, “The Quantum-Mechanical Three Body Problem,” Vieweg, Braunschweig (1974).Google Scholar
- 33.H. J. Korsch and R. Môhlenkamp, J. Phys. B 10:3451 (1977); H. J. Korsch, Phys. Rev. A 14:1645 (1976); B. J. B. Crowley and B. Buck, J. Phys. G 4: 9 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.K. Burnett, unpublished work.Google Scholar