Advertisement

Chlorphyll a/b Binding Proteins and the Small Subunit of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase are Encoded by Multiple Genes in Petunia

  • Pamela Dunsmuir
  • John Bedbrook
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 63)

Summary

There are at least sixteen chorophyll a/b binding protein coding sequences in the nuclear genome of the diploidized Mitchell haploid Petunia line. These genes can be classified into at least five distinct families based on the relatedness of the nucleotide sequence which encodes the 60, C-terminal amino acids of the peptide. There is as much as 10% nucleotide divergence and 5% amino acid sequence divergence between the genes of different families in this region. For two of the families we find that two closely related genes are adjacent and in both examples the two genes are in an inverted orientation with respect to each other such that the 5′ ends of the genes are opposed. At least one gene from four of the families is transcribed. The 3′ untranslated sequences of the genes are divergent between families yet well conserved within a single family.

The multiple genes for the small subunit peptide of ribulose (-1,5-) bisphosphate carboxylase (SSU) can be also be divided into four families based on the relatedness of the coding sequences. We have found evidence for linkage between two SSU genes and for the transcription of at least one gene from each family.

Our data suggest that there may be at least five different chlorophyll a/b binding peptides, and four different small subunit peptides for ribulose (-1,5-) bisphosphate carboxylase in the petunia leaf chloroplast.

Keywords

cDNA Clone cDNA Probe Genomic Fragment Bisphosphate Carboxylase Nuclear Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boardman, N.K., Anderson, J.M., and Goodchild, D.J. (1978). Current Topics in Bioenergetics 8; 35–109.Google Scholar
  2. Bedbrook, J.R., Smith, S.M., and Ellis, R.J. (1980). Nature 287: 692–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cashmore, A.R. (1976). J.Biol.Chem. 251: 2848–2853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chua, N.-H., and Schmidt, G.W. (1979). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. USA 75:6110–6114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coruzzi, G., Brogue, A., Cashmore, A, and Chua, N.-H. (1982) J.Biol.Chem, (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Dobberstein, B.G., Blobel, G., and Chua, N.-H. (1977) Proc, Natl. Acad. Sei. USA 74: 1082–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunsmuir, P. and Bedbrook, J. (1982) Submitted.Google Scholar
  8. Highfield, P.E., and Ellis, R.J. (1978). Nature 271:420–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawashima, N., and Wildman, S.G. (1972). BBA 262:42–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitchell, A.Z. (1979). Anther Culture in Petunia. Thesis B.A.(Hons) Harvard University.Google Scholar
  11. Proudfoot, N.J., and Brownlee, G.G. (1976). Nature 263: 211–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rimm, D.L., Horness, D., Kucera, J., and Blattner, F.R. (1980). Gene 12: 301–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmidt, G.W., Devilliers-Thiery, A., Desruisseaux, H., Blobel, G., and Chua, N.-H. (1979). J.Cell Biol. 83:615–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Southern, E.M. (1975).J.Mol.Biol. 98:503–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Von Wettstein, D. (1981). Int. Cell Biol. 250-272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Dunsmuir
    • 1
  • John Bedbrook
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Plant IndustryCanberra CityAustralia
  2. 2.Advanced Genetic Sciences Inc.BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations