Attaining Autonomic Calming Through Behavioral Control: A Response-Learning Approach

  • John J. Furedy


The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is sensitive to, and excited by, psychological stress. This influence is evidenced by such changes in ANS-controlled physiological functions as tachycardia and blood pressure increase. Although for some individuals, these reactions are not harmful (being within the normal physiological range), for others the reactions are undesirable. For example, tachycardia in patients with cardiovascular abnormalities can precipitate paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (PAT) and even sudden death. For such individuals in particular, control of these stress-induced reactions is critical.


Conditional Stimulus Behavioral Control Pavlovian Conditioning Unconditional Response Response Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biederman, G.B., and Furedy, J.J. A History of rat preference for signalled shock: From Paradox to Paradigm. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1979, 31, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, G.B., and Young, L.D. Self-control and cardiac functioning: A promise as yet unfulfilled. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 145–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Furedy, J.J. An Integrative Progress Report on Informational Control in Humans: Some laboratory findings and methodological claims. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1975, 27, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Furedy, J.J. Pavlovian and operant feedback procedures combined produce large-magnitude conditional heart-rate decelerations. In J. Beatty and H. Legewie (Eds), Biofeedback and Behavior, New York, Plenum, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. Furedy, J.J. Teaching Self-regulation of cardiac function through imaginational Pavlovian and Biofeedback conditioning: Remember the response. In, N. Birnbaumer and H. D. Kimmel (Eds), Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Furedy, J.J., and Doob, A.N. Signaling unmodifiable shocks: Limits on human informational cognitive control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972, 21, 111–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furedy, J.J., and Klajner, F. Imaginational Pavlovian conditioning of large-magnitude cardiac decelerations with tilt as US. Psychophysiology, 1978, 15, 538–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furedy, J.J., and Poulos, C.S. Human Pavlovian decelerative cardiac conditioning based on a respiratory induced cardiac deceleration as the unconditional reflex. Biological Psychology, 1975, 2, 165–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furedy, J.J., and Poulos, C.X. Heart-rate decelerative Pavlovian conditioning with tilt as UCS: Towards behavioral control of cardiac dysfunction. Biological Psychology, 1976, 4, 93–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furedy, J.J., and Riley, D.M. Classical and operant conditioning in the enhancement of biofeedback: Specifics and speculations. Invited paper for closed session research symposium on Clinical Biofeedback: Efficacy and Mechanisms. State University of New York at Stony Brook, May 1980, In Clinical Biofeedback: Efficacy and Mechanisms, L. White and B. Tursky (Eds), Guilford, 1982a, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Furedy, J.J., and Riley, D.M. Review of Yates’ Biofeedback and the Modification of Behavior, Biological Psychology, 1982b in press.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrick, M.W., and Graham, F. Multiple-component heart rateresponses conditioned under paced respiration, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 25, 396–494.Google Scholar
  13. Mackintosh, N.J. The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Rescorla, R.A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 71–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rescorla, R.A., and Wagner, A.R. A Theory of Pavlovian Conditioning: Variations on the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. in A.H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds), Classical Conditioning I I, N.Y. Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Riley, D.M., and Furedy, J.J., Psychological and physiological systems: Modes of operation and interaction. In S. Burchfield (Ed), Psychological and physiological interactions in the response to stress. 1982, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Schwartz, B. Psychology of learning and behavior, Toronto: McLeod, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Segal, E.M., and Lachman, R. Complex behavior or higher mental processes: Is there a paradigm shift? American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood, D.M. and Obrist, P.A. Effects of controlled and uncontrolled respiration on the conditioned heart rate response in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 68, 221–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John J. Furedy
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations