Advertisement

Introduction and Historical Perspective

  • Toby K. Eisenstein
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 162)

Abstract

Various microorganisms have evolved specialized, and in many cases, unique mechanisms for evading host defenses. For organisms such as pneumococci and Haemophilus, the presence of a capsular coat allows the organism to evade phagocytosis and multiply unchecked in the extracellular fluid. The ingestion of the pneumococcus by the pursuing polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) results in the subsequent death of this pathogen in the hydrogen peroxide-filled atmosphere of the phagolysosome. Minute amounts of antibody directed towards the antigenic determinants of the capsular polysaccharide render the pneumococcus an easy target for the PMN. Thus, excellent protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is provided for non-immune animals receiving injections of immune serum.

Keywords

Streptococcus Pneumoniae Listeria Monocytogenes Historical Perspective Intracellular Pathogen Capsular Polysaccharide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lurie, M.B. (1964). Resistance to tuberculosis: Experimental studies in native and acquired defensive mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koch, R. (1891). Fortsetzung der mittheilungen uber ein heilmittel gegen tuberkulöse. Deutsche Med. Wochenschr. 17:101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Von Pirquet, C. (1907). Klinische Studien uber Vakzination und vaksinale allergie. Deuticke, Leipsig.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chase, M.W. (1945). The cellular transfer of cutaneous hypersensitivity to tuberculin. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 59:134.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rich, A.R. (1951). The pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Charles Thomas, Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mackaness, G.B. (1964). The immunological basis of acquired cellular resistance. J. Exp. Med. 120:105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mackaness, G.B. (1969). The influence of immunologically committed lymphoid cells on macrophage activity in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 129:973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David, J.R. (1966). Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56:72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bloom, B.R. and B. Bennett. (1966). Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Science 153:80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toby K. Eisenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyTemple University School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations