Mathematical Design Tools for Integrated Production Systems

  • James J. Solberg
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)


Long before the operating policies of a manufacturing system are considered, many design decisions are made which affect the ultimate ability of production managers to control the performance of the system. Although some of the more advanced companies employ simulation methods to “fine tune” their system designs, few make use of any formal methodology at all in the critical early stages. Fundamental design issues, such as how large the system will be or the selection of processing and material handling equipment, are usually dealt with by arbitrary choice or back-of-the-envelope calculations. It is ironic that the most important design decisions -- those having the greatest long-term impact on system productivity -- are handled in the least careful manner.


Material Handling Travel Time Distribution Open Research Issue Bottleneck Shift Material Handling Equipment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    “The Machine Tool Task Force Reports on Metalcutting Machine-tool Technology”, American Machinist, October 1980, pp. 105-128.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Machining Costs in the U.S.A. Reach $115 Billion Annually”, Machining Briefs, Vol. 8, No. 5, Sept/Oct 1979, p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    “The Machine Tool Task Force Reports on Metalcutting Machinetool Technology”, American Machinist, October 1980, pp. 105-128.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merchant, M.E., “The Inexorable Push for Automated Production”, Production Engineering, Jan. 1977, pp. 44-49.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solberg, J.J., “A Mathematical Model of Computerized Manufacturing Systems”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Production Research, Tokyo, Japan, August, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solberg, J. J., “CAN-Q User’s Guide”, Report No. 9 (Revised), Optimal Planning of Computerized Manufacturing Systems, Purdue University, July, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solberg, J.J., and Nof, S.Y., “Analysis of Flow Control in Alternative Manufacturing Configurations”, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 102 (1980), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nof, S.Y., Barash, M.M., and Solberg, J.J., “Operational Control of Item Flow in Versatile Manufacturing Systems”, Int. J. Prod. Res., Vol. 17, No. 5, 1979, pp. 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solberg, J.J., “Capacity Planning with a Stochastic Workflow Model”, AIIE Transactions, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 1981, pp. 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Solberg
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Industrial EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations