Advertisement

Use of Group Technology Concepts in Integrated Production Planning

  • Ibrahim Nişanci
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)

Abstract

This study emphasizes the use of Group Technology concepts in the design of an integrated production planning and control system. In doing so, the manufacturing difficulties and the various complexities in the design and use of such a system in jobbing manufacture or small batch manufacture will be elaborated upon. The main complexities in jobbing manufacture steins from the variability in the volume and mix of the products and from the nature of demand. Jobbing manufacture is characterized by a complex work-flow structure and highly variable manufacturing times which complicate the production planning and control activities. High throughput times, extensive delays, high work in progress stocks, low utilization of labour and machinery, demanding supervision and control of production are the basic indicators related to the problems encountered in production planning and control activities in jobbing manufacture.

Keywords

Production Planning Product Family Flexible Manufacturing System Group Technology Bottleneck Machine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burbidge, J.L., 1971, Production flow analysis, Prod. Engr., 50:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carrie, A.S., 1977, Group technology: part family formation and machine grouping techniques, The Manufacturing Productivity Education Committee.Google Scholar
  3. Durie, F.R.E., 1976, A survey of group technology and its potential for user in the U.K., Prod.Engr., 55:108.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards G.A.B., Koenigsberger, F., 1973, The cell system and machine tools, Prod. Engr., 52:249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eilon S., 1962, “Elements of Production Planning and Control”, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Groover, M.P., 1980, “Automation, Production Systems and Computer Aided Manufacturing”, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Holstein, W.K.,1960, Production Planning and Control Integrated, Harvard Business Rev., May–June.Google Scholar
  8. King, J. R., 1980, Machine-component group formation in group technology, Omega, 8:193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McAuley, J., 1972, Machine grouping for efficient production, Prod.Engr., 51:53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nişanci, H. I., Sury, R.J., 1981, Group technology in shoe Manufacturing, Int. J. Prod. Res.,9:337.Google Scholar
  11. National Economic Development Office (NEDO), 1975, Why group Technology, London.Google Scholar
  12. Nişanc1, H.I., Gürlek, B., 1981, Detailed Layout Planning for Jobbing and Batch Manufacture, Proc. of the VIth Int.Conf. on Prod.Res. Novi-Sad, 233.Google Scholar
  13. Opitz, H., Wiendahl, H.P., 1971, Group Technology and manufacturing Systems for small and medium quantity production, Int.J.Prod.Res., 9:181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Willey, P.C.T., Dale B.G., 1977, Manufacturing characteristics and management performance of companies under group technology, paper presented at the 18th MTDR Conf., London; 1979, Group Technology-same factors which influence its success, chart. Mech.Engr., September.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim Nişanci
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations