Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Toxicological Studies: Principles and Interpretations

  • David K. Detweiler
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 161)

Abstract

After a long period when reviews of cardiovascular toxicology were sporadic (Bohle, 1966; Wenzel, 1967; Selye, 1970: Chung and Dean, 1972; Davies and Gold, 1977) the literature has been dramatically enriched during the past 18 months by the appearance of three monographs devoted to cardiotoxicity (Bristow, 1980; Balazs, 1981; Van Stee, 1982). Although there is some sharing of authors and, of course, topics in these three works, they are not excessively repetitious and each collection of articles makes its own unique contribution.

Keywords

Toxicity Foam Glycol Angiotensin Histamine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atta, A.G. and Vanace, P.W., 1960, Electrocardiographic studies in the Macaca mulatta monkey, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 85:811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balazs, T., 1974, Development of tissue resistance to toxic effects of chemicals, Toxicology, 2:247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balazs, T. and Hermann, E.H., 1976, Toxic cardiomyopathies, Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 6:467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balazs, T. (ed.), 1981, “Cardiac Toxicology”, Vol. I. II. III. CRC Press, Boxa Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  5. Bellet, S., 1963, Clinical Disorders of the Heart Beat, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  6. Bellet, S., 1972, Essentials of Cardiac Arrhythmias, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, S., 1981, Reversible and irreversible injury: calcium as a major determinant, in: “Cardiac Toxicology”, Vol. 1, T. Balazs, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 179–199.Google Scholar
  8. Bohle, E., 1966, Blutgefässe, in: “Erkrankungen durch Arzneimittel”, R. Heinz (ed.), Thieme, Stuttgart, 170–187.Google Scholar
  9. Bohn, F.K. und Henner, S., 1968, Elektrokardiographische Untersuchungen bei Miniatur Schweinen, Ztschr. ges. exper. Med., 145:365.Google Scholar
  10. Bristow, M.R. (ed.), 1980, “Drug Induced Heart Disease”, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Budden, R., Detweiler, D.K., Aridzbinden, G. (eds.), 1981, “The Rat Electrocardiogram in Pharmacology and Toxicology”, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Caceres, C.A., 1978, Present status of computer interpretation of the electrocardiogram. A 20-year overview, Am. J. Cardiol., 41:121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chung, E.K. and Dean, H.M., 1972, Diseases of the heart and vascular system due to drugs, in: L. Meyler and H.M. Peck (eds.), “Drug Induced Diseases”, Vol. 4., Excerpt. Med., Amsterdam, 345–380.Google Scholar
  14. Cimprich, R.E., Robertson, J.L., Kutz, S.A., Struve, P.S., Detweiler, D.K., DeBaecke, P.J. and Street, C.S., 1981, Degenerative cardiomyopathy in experimental Beagles following parvovirus exposure. Toxicol. Pathol., 9:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, D.M. and Gold, R.G., 1977, Cardiac disorders, in: “Textbook of Adverse Drug Reactions”, D.M. Davies, (ed.), Oxford Univ. Oxford, 82:102.Google Scholar
  16. Detweiler, D.K., 1981a, The use of electrocardiography in toxico-logical studies with Beagle dogs. In, Balazs, T. (ed.) Cardiac Toxicology. Vol. III, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 33–82.Google Scholar
  17. Detweiler, D.K., 1981b, The use of electrocardiography in toxico-logical studies with rats, in: R. Budden, D.K. Detweiler, and G. Zbinden, (eds.), “The Rat Electrocardiogram in Pharmacology and Toxicology”, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 83–115.Google Scholar
  18. Detweiler, D.K., Saatman, R.A., and DeBaecke, P.J., 1981, Cardiac arrhythmias accompanying sialodacryoadenitis in the rat, in: R. Budden, D.K. Detweiler, and G. Zbinden (eds.), “The Rat Electrocardiogram in Pharmacology and Toxicology”, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 129.Google Scholar
  19. Detweiler, D.K., Cinrprich, R.E., DeBaecke, P.J., Kutz, S.A., Robertson, J.L., Street, O.S., and Struve, P.S., 1982, Cardiomyopathy in parvvirus exposed experimental Beagles. Trends Pharmacol. Sciences. 3:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dukes, T.W., and Szabuniewicz, M., 1969, The electrocardiogram of conventional and miniature swine (S. Scropa). Can. J. Comp. Med. 33:118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellestad, M.H., 1981, Ellestad stress test analyzer. Del Mar Avionics, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, H.H., 1971, “Diagnostic Electrocardiography and Vectorcardiography”, McGraw-Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
  23. Fillmore, G.E., and Detweiler, D.K., 1973, Maintenance of subacute digoxin toxicosis in normal beagles, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 25:418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glassman, P.M., and Angelakos, E.T., 1965, Electrocardiogram of the golden hamster, Am. J. Med. Electronics, 4:42.Google Scholar
  25. Goldbarg, A.N., Hellerstein, H.K., Bruell, J.H., and Daroczy, A.F., 1968, Electrocardiogram of the normal mouse, Mus musculus: General Considerations and Genetic Aspects. Cardiovasc. Res. 2:93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grauwiler, J., and Spörri, H., 1960, Fehlen der ST-Strecke im Elektrokardiogramm von verschiedenen Säugetierarten. Helv. Physiol. Acta, 18:C77–C78.Google Scholar
  27. Grauwiler, J., 1965, “Herz und Kreislauf der Säugetiere”, Birkhauser, Basel.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, P.S., Cangliano, B., Leamy, L., and Ellestad, M.H., 1980, Use of the multivariate approach to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the treadmill stress test, J. Electro-cardiol., 13:277Google Scholar
  29. Hagen, A. et al., 1978, Task Force IA: Development of a data base for electrocardiographic use, Am. J. Cardiol., 41:145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamlin, R.L., Robinson, F.R., and Smith, C.R., 1961, Electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram of Macaca mulatta in various postures, Am. J. Physiol., 201:1083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamlin, R.L., and Smith, C.R., 1965, Categorization of common domestic mammals based upon their ventricular activation process, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 127:195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, D.G. (ed.), 1981, “Cardiac Arrhythmias”, Hall, Boston.Google Scholar
  33. Hill, J.D., 1968a, The electrocardiogram in dogs with standardized body and limb positions, J. Electrocardiol., 1:175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill, J.D., 1968b, The significance of foreleg position in the interpretation of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from research animals, Am. Heart J., 75:518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holden, M. and Itil, T., 1977/78, Electrocardiographic changes with psychotropic drugs, in, “Stress and the Heart”, D. Wheatley, (ed.) Raven Press, N.Y., 87.Google Scholar
  36. Jacotot, B., 1965, L’electrocardiogramme du lapin. Analyse des traces de 75 animaux sains, Rec. Med. Vet. 141:1095.Google Scholar
  37. Lazdunski, M., and Renaud, J.F., 1982, The action of cardiotoxins on cardiac plasma membranes, in I.S. Edelman (ed.) Ann. Rev. Physiol. 44:463.Google Scholar
  38. Lepeschkin, E., 1951, “Modern Electrocardiography”, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  39. Malinow, M.R., and DeLannoy, C.W., Jr., 1967, The electrocardiogram of Macaca fuscata, Folia primat., 7:284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malinow, M.R., Hill, J.D., and Ochsner, A.J. III, 1974, The heart rate in caged rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Lab. Anim. Sci., 24:537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. v. Mickwitz G., 1967, Herz- und Kreislaufuntersuchungen beim Schwein mit Berücksichtigung des Elektrokardiogramms und des Phonokardiogramms, Habilitationsschr. Tierärztl. Hochschule Hannover, West-Germany.Google Scholar
  42. Morganroth, J., 1981, Ambulatory monitoring: The impact of spontaneous variability of simple and complex ventricular ectopy, in, D.G. Harrison, (ed.) “Cardiac Arrhythmias”, Hall, Boston 479.Google Scholar
  43. Osborne, B.E., 1973, A restraining device for use when recording electrocardiograms in monkeys, Lab. Animals, 7:289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pipberger, H.V., Arzbaecher, R.C., Berson, A.S., BriTler, S.A., Brody, D.A., Flowers, N.C., Geselowitz, D.B., Lepeschkin, E., Oliver, G.C., Schmitt, O.H., and Spach, M., 1975, Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography, Circulation, 52:11.Google Scholar
  45. Rautaharju, P.M. et al., 1978, Task Force III. Computer in diagnostic electrocardiography, Am. J. Cardiol. 41:158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Regan, T.J., and Haider, B., 1980, Pathophysiological effects of ethanol on cardiac tissue, in: “Drug Induced Heart Disease”, M.R. Bristow (ed.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, 175.Google Scholar
  47. Richtarck, A., Woolsey, T.A., and Valdivia, E., 1965, Method for recording ECG’s in unanesthetized guinea pigs, J. Appl. Physiol. 20:1091.Google Scholar
  48. Robinson, D.S., and Barker, E., 1976, Tricyclic antidepressant car-diotoxicity, J. Am. Med. Assn., 236:2089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roshchevsky, M.P., 1978, “Elektrokardiologia Kopytnych Zyvotnych”, Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  50. Rubin, J.I., and Rubin, E., 1982, Myocardial toxicity of alcohols, aldehydes, and glycols, including alcoholic cardiomyopathy in: “Cardiovascular Toxicology”, E.W. Van Stee, (ed.) Raven Press, N.Y., 353.Google Scholar
  51. Rydén, L., Waldenstrom, A., and Holmberg, S., 1975, The reliability of intermittent ECG sampling in arrhythmia detection, Circ. 52:540.Google Scholar
  52. Scherf, D. and Schott, A., 1973, “Extrasystoles and Allied Arrhythmias”, Year Book Medical Publishing, Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Selye, H., 1970, “Experimental Cardiovascular Diseases”, Vol. 1 and 2, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh, R., Chakravarti, R.N., Chhuttani, P.N., and Wahi, P.L., 1970, Electrocardiographic studies in rhesus monkeys, J. Appl. Physiol. 28:346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh, B.N., Collett, J.J., and Chew, C.Y.C., 1980, New perspectives in the pharmacologic therapy of cardiac arrhythmias. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 22:243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spörri, H., 1944; Der Einfluss der Tuberkulose auf das Elektrokardiogramm. Untersuchungen an Meerschweinchen und Rindern. Arch, wiss. prak. Tierheilk. 79:57.Google Scholar
  57. Surawicz, B., 1967, Relationship between electrocardiogram and electrolytes, Am. Heart J., 73:814.Google Scholar
  58. Surawicz, B., 1972, The pathogenesis and clinical significance of primary T-wave abnormalities, in: “Advances in Electrocardiography”, R.D. Schlant, and I.W. Hurst, (eds.) Grune & Stratton, N.Y.Google Scholar
  59. Surawicz, B., and Lasseter, K.C., 1970, Effect of drugs on the electrocardiogram, Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 13:26.Google Scholar
  60. Szabuniewicz, M., Hightower, D., and Kyzar, J.R., 1971, The electrocardiogram, vectorcardiogram and spatiocardiogram in the rabbit, Can. J. Comp. Med., 35:107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Teske, R.H., Bishop, S.P., Righter, H.F., and Detweiler, D.K., 1976, Subacute digoxin in toxicosis in the Beagle dog, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 35:283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thielscher, H.H., 1969, Elektrokardiographische Untersuchungen an deutschen veredelten Landschweinen der Landeszucht und der Herdbuchzucht, Zentralblatt der Vet. med., A. 16:370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toback, J.M., Clark, J.C., and Mooreman, W.J., 1978, The electrocardiogram of Macaca fascicularis, 28:182.Google Scholar
  64. Van Stee, E.W., (ed.), 1982, “Cardiovascular Toxicology”, Raven Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  65. Van Stee, E.W., 1982, Cardiovascular Toxicology: foundations and scope, in: “Cardiovascular Toxicology”, E.W. Van Stee, (ed.), Raven Press, N.Y. 1.Google Scholar
  66. Vaughan, Williams, E.M., 1975, Classification of antidysrhythmic drugs, Pharmacol. Therapy B., 1, 115.Google Scholar
  67. Wenzel, D.G., 1967, Drug induced cardiomyopathies, J. Pharmaceut. Sci., 56:1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wolf, R.H., Lehner, N.D.M., Miller, E.C., and Clarkson, T.B., 1969, Electrocardiogram of the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus, J. Appl. Physiol., 26 346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Zuckermann, R., 1959, “Grundriss und Atlas der Elektrokardiographie”, Thieme, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • David K. Detweiler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations