Advertisement

Factors Determining Virgin and Postantigenic Repertoires of B Cell Population and its Subsets

  • Olli Mäkelä
  • H. O. Sarvas
  • I. J. T. Seppälä
Part of the Nobel Foundation Symposia Published by Plenum book series (NOFS, volume 55)

Abstract

The repertoire of specifities (different Ig FV pieces) that a population of B lymphocytes can produce is large but its size depends on what meaning is given to the word. Two meanings are important for this discussion (Table 1). One (the virgin repertoire) is the collection of FV pieces in antigen-free individuals. The other repertoire includes all FV structures that individuals of a certain genotype (say the BALB/c mouse) can produce when immunized with all possible antigens (the potential postantigenic repertoire). When it is discussed whether known mechanisms of diversity-generation are sufficient to explain the observed variability this potential postantigenic repertoire is often in the minds of the discussers.

Keywords

Newborn Mouse Cell Repertoire Polysaccharide Conjugate IgG3 Cell Immunological Unresponsiveness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. J. Gearhart, N. D. Johnson, R. Douglas, and L. Hood, IgG antibodies to phosphorylcholine exhibit more diversity than their IgM counterparts, Nature, 291: 29 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. Cunningham; Evolution in microcosm: the rapid somatic diversification of lymphocytes, in: “Symposia on Quantitative Biology,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Kurosawa and S. Tonegawa, Organization, structure, and assembly of immunoglobulin heavy chain diversity DNA segments, J. Exp. Med., 155: 201 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. J. Gearhart, Generation of immunoglobulin variable gene diversity, Immunology Today, 3: 107 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. H. Sigal, P. J. Gearhart, J. L. Press, and N. R. Klinman, Late acquisition of a germ line antibody specificity, Nature, 259: 51 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Fernandez and G. Möller, Immunological unresponsiveness to native dextran B512 in young animals of dextran high responder strains is due to lack of Ig receptor expression. Evidence for a nonrandom expression of V-genes, J. Exp. Med., 147: 645 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Ahmed, I. Scher, S. O. Sharrow, A. H. Smith, W. E. Paul, D. H. Sachs, and K. W. Sell, B-lymphocyte heterogeneity: development and characterization of an alloantiserum which distinguishes B-lymphocyte differentiation alloantigens, J. Exp. Med., 145: 101 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    In: “Idiotypes - Antigens on the Inside” page 18, I. Westen-Schnurr, ed., F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co, Basle (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. J. Mond, R. Lieverman, J. K. Inman, D. E. Mosier, and W. E. Paul, Inability of mice with a defect in B-lymphocyte maturation to respond to phosphorylcholine on immunogenic carriers, J. Exp. Med., 146: 1138 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Fernandez and G. Möller, Immunological unresponsiveness to thymus-independent antigens: two fundamentally different genetic mechanisms of B-cell unresponsiveness to dextran, J. Exp. Med., 146: 1663 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. M. Perlmutter, D. Hansburg, E. Briles, R.A. Nicolotti, and J. M. Davie, Subclass restriction of murine anticarbohydrate antibodies. J. Immunol., 121: 566 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. P. D. Der-Balian, J. Slack, B. L. Clevinger, H. Bazin, and J. M. Davie, Subclass restriction of murine antibodies. III. Antigens that stimulate IgG3 in mice stimulate IgG2c in rats, J. Exp. Med., 152: 209 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. K. A. Mongini, K. E. Stein, and W. E. Paul, T cell regulation of IgG subclass antibody production in response to T-independent antigens, J. Exp. Med. 153: 1 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. L. Hurwitz, V. B. Tagart, P. A. Schweitzer, and J. J. Cebra, Patterns of isotype expression by B cell clones responding to thymus-dependent and thymus-independent antigens in vitro, Eur. J. Immunol., 12: 342 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Martinez-Alonso, A. Coutinho, and A. A. Augustin, Immunoglobulin C-gene expression. I. The commitment to IgG subclass of secretory cells is determined by the quality of the nonspecific stimuli, Eur. J. Immunol., 10: 698 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Seppälä, H. Sarvas, F. Péterfy, and O. Mäkelä, The four subclasses of IgG can be isolated from mouse serum by using protein A-Sepharose, Scand. J. Immunol. 14: 335 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. O. Sarvas, I. J. T. Seppälä, T. Tähtinen, F. Péterfy, and O. Mäkelä, Mouse IgG antibodies have subclass associated affinity differences, Submitted to Molecular Immunology.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Sarvas, L. Aaltonen, F. Péterfy, and O. Mäkelä, IgG subclass distributions in anti-hapten and anti-polysaccharide antibodies induced by haptenated polysaccharides, Submitted to J. Immunol.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Slack, G. P. Der-Balian, M. Nahm, and J. M. Davie, Subclass restriction of murine antibodies. II. The IgG plaque-forming cell response to thymus-independent type 1 and type 2 antigens in normal mice and mice expressing an X-linked immunodeficiency, J. Exp. Med., 151: 853 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Schalch, J. K. Wright, L. S. Rodkey, and D. G. Braun, Distinct functions of monoclonal IgG antibody depend on antigen-site specificities, J. Exp. Med., 149: 923 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Schalch, J. K. Wright, L. S. Rodkey, and D. G. Braun, Clonal dominance of low-affinity antibodies in rabbit hyper-immune anti-streptococcal group A-variant polysaccharide antisera, Eur. J. Immunol., 9: 145 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. T. Shulman and E. M. Ayoub, Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the human antibody response to streptococcal group A carbohydrate, J. Clin. Invest., 54: 990 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. M. Perlmutter, M. Nahm, K. E. Stein, J. Slack, I. Zitron, W.E. Paul, and J. M. Davie, Immunoglobulin subclass-specific immunodeficiency in mice with an X-linked B-lymphocyte defect, J. Exp. Med., 149: 993 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. L. Press, The CBA/N defect defines two classes of T cell-dependent antigens, J. Immunol., 126: 1234 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olli Mäkelä
    • 1
  • H. O. Sarvas
    • 1
  • I. J. T. Seppälä
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bacteriology and ImmunologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinki 29Finland

Personalised recommendations