Advertisement

Therapy with Minority Families

  • Jo-Ann M. Rivera
  • Jandyra Velazquez

Abstract

Clinicians increasingly are convinced of the central contribution of healthy, well integrated families to the life and identity of society and its members. A family is not merely a collection of people or aggregate of individual psyches occupying a particular physical and temporal space. Nor is it just a social group characterized by a common residence, economic cooperation, and reproduction. A family is a natural social system with a structure, development, and function that builds into a vast network of interpersonal relationships. It involves conscious and unconscious processes that provide its members with an identity and a historical continuity. Family systems provide the primary environment for growth, development of identity, and sense of belonging in the world. All its members, including adults, move in an evolutionary process, which challenges each member to new and different developmental tasks and roles. Family norms function to bind this unit in a common culture and boundary.

Keywords

Nuclear Family Family System Joint Family Minority Family Hispanic Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, N. Treating the troubled family. New York: Basic Books, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Aponte, H. Underorganization in the poor family. In P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy theory and practice. New York: Gardner Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Billingsley, A. & Giovannosi, J. M. Children of the Storm. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Billingsley, A. Black families in white America. London: Prentice-Hall International, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. Duality: The need to consider this characteristic when treating black families. Center for Family Learning Conference, New York, March 22, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. The social and economic status of the black population in the U.S.A. A historical view 1970–1978. Current Population Reports, Special Studies, No. 80.Google Scholar
  7. Caplan, G. Support systems and community mental health. New York: Behavioral Publications, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Cassel, J. The relation of the urban environment to mental health: Implications for prevention. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 1973, 40, 539–550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, J., & Gurak, D. Hispanic inter-marriage in New York City: 1975. Hispanic Research Center, New York, Monograph 2, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick, J. The Puerto Rican family. In C. H. Mindel & R. W. Habenstein (Eds.), Ethnic families in America. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Fitzpatrick, J. Puerto Rican Americans: The meaning of migration to the mainland. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. Garrison, V. Social networks, social change and mental health among migrants in a New York City slum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. Garrison, V. Support systems of schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic Puerto Rican migrant women. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1978, 4 (4), 561–596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gitlin, J. Some signposts for policy. In R. N. Adams (Ed.), Social change in Latin America today. New York: Vintage, 1960.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, R. B. The strengths of black families. New York: National Urban League, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, R. B. The illusion of black progress. New York: National Urban League, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. Lauria, A. “Respeto, Relajo,” and interpersonal relations in Puerto Rico. Anthropological Quarterly, 1964, 37 (2), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leichter, H., & Mitchell, W. Kinship and casework. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Mindel, H., & Ilabenstein, R. W. Ethnic families in America: Patterns and variations. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
  20. Mintz, S., and Wolf, E. An Analysis of ritual co-parenthood (compradrazgo). Southwest Journal of Anthropology, 1950, 6, 341–368.Google Scholar
  21. Mizio, E. Impact of external systems on the Puerto Rican family. Social Casework, February 1974, pp. 76–83.Google Scholar
  22. Mussen, P., & Maldonado-Beytagh, L. A. Industrialization, childbearing practices and children’s personality. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1969, 115, 195–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Padilla, E. Up from Puerto Rico. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Parad, H., & Kaplan, G. A Framework for studying families in crisis. In H. Parad (Ed.), Crisis intervention: Selected readings. New York: Family Service Association of America, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Rapp, R. Family and class in contemporary America: Notes toward an understanding of ideology. Science and Society, 1978, 42 (3), 278–300.Google Scholar
  26. Rogler, L., & Hollingshead, A. Trapped: Families and schizophrenia. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  27. Steward, J. The people of Puerto Rico. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Wells, H. The modernization of Puerto Rico. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  29. Wolf, K. L. Growing up and its price in three Puerto Rican subcultures. Psychiatry, 1952, 15, 401–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zwerling, I., Alvarez, R., Batson, R., Can, A., Parks, P., Peck, H., Shervington, W., & Tyler, F. Racism, elitism, professionalism. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo-Ann M. Rivera
    • 1
  • Jandyra Velazquez
    • 2
  1. 1.Family Studies SectionAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx Psychiatric CenterBronxUSA
  2. 2.Child, Adolescent, and Family ServicesFordham Tremont Community Mental Health CenterBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations