Abstract
Classical ethology provides two fundamental themes which remain at the heart of current research in neuroethology. First, is the assumption that events in the sensory “Umwelt” activate behavior via narrowly-tuned stimulus filters — i.e., that relatively few distinctive features determine the recognition of food, mate, parent or enemy. The term “innate releasing mechanisms” is probably too narrow to characterize the complexity of sensory recognition schema for birds and mammals, but it still seems to apply to many behaviors of fishes, amphibians and reptiles. As an example, the feeding behavior in newly metamorphosed froglets (Ingle, unpubl. data) seems to emerge fullblown: with no prior experience as tadpoles in pursuing visual objects, they accurately turn and snap at small moving prey. These movement sequences also fit the original notion of a “fixed action pattern”, which is the second main inheritance from classical ethology. During prey-catching the frog’s coordination of head, mouth, tongue and leg movements is highly stereotyped. The patterns predictable from knowing the radial location, height and distance of the prey. Although the behavior appears rigid, it is fast and accurate: well-adapted for the rigorous competition for food and survival among a large population with limited resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akert, K., 1949, Der visuelle Greifreflex. Helv. Physiol. Acta, 7:112–134.
Arbib, M.A., 1981, Rana computatrix:An evolving model of visuomotor coordination in frog and toad, Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. 81-6, Univ. Massachusetts.
Bechterew, W., 1884, Über die Function der Vierhügel. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. Menschen und Tiere, 33:413–439.
Collett, T., 1977, Stereopsis in toads. Nature, 267:349–351.
Collewijn, H., 1975, Oculomotor areas in the rabbit’s midbrain and pretectum. J. Neurobiol., 6:3–22.
Comer, C., and Grobstein, P., 1978, Prey acquisition in atectal frogs. Brain Res., 153:217:221.
Ewert, J.-P., 1967, Aktivierung der Verhaltensfolge beim Beutefang der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.) durch elektrische Mittelhirnreizung. Z. Vergl. Physiol., 54:455–481.
Ewert, J.-P., 1968, Der Einfluß von Zwischenhirndefekten auf die Visuomotorik im Beute-und Fluchtverhalten der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). Z. Vergl. Physiol., 61:41–70.
Ewert, J.-P., 1971, Single-unit response of the toad (Bufo americanus) caudal thalamus to visual objects. Z. vergl. Physiol., 74:81–102.
Ewert, J.-P., 1983, Tectal mechanisms underlying prey-catching and avoidance behaviors in toads, in “Neurology of the Optic Tectum”, H. Vanegas, ed., Plenum Press, New York.
Ewert, J.-P., and Gebauer, L., 1973, Größenkonstanzphänomene im Beutefangverhalten der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo L.). J. Comp. Physiol., 85:303–315.
Ewert, J.-P., and von Seelen W., 1974, Neurobiologie und System-Theorie eines visuellen Muster-Erkennungsmechanismus bei Kröten. Kybernetik, 14:167–183.
Ewert, J.-P., and von Wietersheim, A., 1974a, Musterauswertung durch Tectum-und Thalamus/Praetectum-Neurone im visuellen System der Kröte Bufo bufo (L.). J. Comp. Physiol., 92:131–148.
Ewert, J.-P., and von Wietersheim, A., 1974b, Der Einfluß von Thalamus/Praetectum-Defekten auf die Antwort von Tectum-Neuronen gegenüber visuellen Mustern bei der Kröte (Bufo bufo L.). J. Comp. Physiol., 92:149–160.
Ewert, J.-P., Hock, F.J., and von Wietersheim, A., 1974, Thalamus/ Praetectum/Tectum: Retinale Topographie und physiologische Interaktionen bei der Kröte (Bufo bufo L.). J. Comp. Physiol., 92:343–356.
Fite, K.V., and Scalia, F., 1976, Central visual pathways in the frog, in “The Amphibian Visual System”, K.V. Fite, ed., Academic Press, New York.
Fontera, J.G., 1952, A study of the anuran diencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol., 96:1–69.
Fuller, P.M., and Ebbesson, S.O.E., 1973, Central projections of the trigeminal nerve in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). J. Comp. Neurol., 152:193–200.
Glasser, S., Fraser, J., and Ingle, D., 1982, Vertical migration of retinal axons in the frog’s optic tectum following laminar denervation. (submitted).
Grüsser, O.-J., and Grüsser-Cornehls, U., 1976, Physiology of the anuran visual system, in “Frog Neurobiology”, R. Llinas and W. Precht, eds., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Hess, W.R., Burgi, S., and Bucher, V., 1946, Motorische Funktion des Tektal-und Tegmentalgebietes. Monatsschr. Psychiatr. Neurol., 112:1–52.
Holcombe, V., and Hall, W.C., 1981, Laminar origin and distribution of crossed tectoreticular pathways. J. Neurosci., 1:1103–1112.
Ingle, D., 1968, Visual releasers of prey catching behavior in frogs and toads. Brain, Behav. Evol., 1:500–518.
Ingle, D., 1970, Visuomotor functions of the frog optic tectum. Brain, Behav. Evol., 3:57–71.
Ingle, D., 1971a, Discrimination of edge-orientation by frogs. Vision Res. 11: 1365–1367.
Ingle, D., 1971b, Prey catching behavior of anurans toward moving and stationary objects. Vision Res. Suppl., 3:447–456.
Ingle, D., 1971c, A possible behavioral correlate of delayed retinal discharge in Anurans. Vision Res., 11:167–168.
Ingle, D., 1973a, Two visual systems in the frog. Science, 81:1053–1055.
Ingle, D., 1973b, Evolutionary perspectives on the function of the optic tectum. Brain, Behav. Evol., 8:211–237.
Ingle, D., 1976, Spatial visi.on in anurans, in: “The Amphibian Visual System”, K.V. Fite, ed., Academic Press, New York.
Ingle, D., 1977, Detection of stationary objects by frogs following optic tectum ablation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 91:1359–1364.
Ingle, D., 1979, Behavioral analysis of frogs with compressed tectal projections, in “Specificity and Plasticity of Retinotectal Connections”, M.V. Edds, R.M. Gaze, G.E. Schneider and L.N. Irwin, eds., Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. Vol.17, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ingle, D., 1980, The frog’s detection of stationary objects following lesions of the pretectum. Behav. Brain Res., 1:139–163.
Ingle, D., 1981, New methods for analysis of vision in the gerbil, in “The Rodent Visual System”, M.A. Goodale, ed., Special Issue of Behav. Brain Res., 3:151–173.
Ingle, D., 1982, The organization of visuomotor behaviors in vertebrates, in “The Analysis of Visual Behavior”, D. Ingle, M. Goodale and R. Mansfield, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ingle, D., and Cook, J., 1977, The effect of viewing distance upon size preference of frogs for prey. Vision Res., 17:1009–1014.
Ingle, D., and Quinn, S., 1982a, Efferent functions of the frog’s tectum: Identification vs. localization of prey, (submitted).
Ingle, D., and Quinn, S., 1982b., Topographic order in pretectal and anterior thalamic afferents to the frog’s optic tectum, (in prep.).
Ingle, D., Cheal, M., and Dizio, P., 1979, Cine analysis of visual orientation and pursuit by the Mongolian gerbil. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 93:919–928.
Katte, O., and Hoffmann, K.-P., 1980, Direction specific neurons in the pretectum of the frog (Rana esculenta). J. Comp. Physiol., 140:53–57.
Kicliter, E., 1973, Flux, wavelength and movement discrimination in frogs: Forebrain and midbrain contributions. Brain, Behav. Evol., 8:340–365.
Kicliter, E., Misantone, L.J., and Stelzner, D.J., 1974, Neuronal specificity and plasticity in frog visual system: Anatomical correlates. Brain Res., 82:293–297.
Lázár, G., 1969, Efferent pathways of the optic tectum in the frog. Acta Biol. (Szeged), 20:171–183.
Lázár, G., 1971, The projection of the retinal quadrants on the optic centers in the frog: A terminal degeneration study. Acta Morphol. Acad. Sci. Hung., 19:325–334.
Lázár, G., 1973, Role of the accessory optic system in the optokinetic nystagmus of the frog. Brain, Behav. Evol., 5:443–460.
Lázár, G., 1979, Organization of the frog visual system, in “Recent Developments of Neurobiology in Hungary” Vol.8, K. Lissak, ed., Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Lázár, G., and Székely, G., 1967, Golgi studies on the optic center of the frog. J. Hirnforsch., 9:329–344.
Lettvin, J.Y., Maturana, H.R., McCulloch, W.S., and Pitts, W.H., 1959, What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proc. IRE, 47:1940–1951.
Lock, A., and Collett, T., 1979, A toad’s devious approach to its prey: A study of some complex uses of depth vision. J. Comp. Physiol., 131:179–189.
Merker, B.H., 1980, “The Sentinal Hypothesis: A Role for the Mammalian Superior Colliculus”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Psychology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Muntz, W.R.A., 1962a, Microelectrode recordings from the diencephalon of the frog (Rana pipiens) and a blue-sensitive system. J. Neurophysiol., 25:699–711.
Muntz, W.R.A., 1962b, Effectiveness of different colors of light in releasing the positive phototactic behavior of frogs, and a possible function of the retinal projection to the diencephalon. J. Neurophysiol., 25:712–720.
Neary, T.J., and Northcutt, R.G., 1979, Organization of the diencephalon of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana. Anat. Rec, 193:635.
Neary, T.J., and Wilczynski, W., 1977, Anterior and posterior thalamic afferents in the bullfrog. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 5:144.
Northmore, D.P.M., 1981, Visual localization after rearrangements of the retinotectal map in fish. Nature, 293:142–144.
Raczkowski, D., Casagrande, V.A., and Diamond, I.T., 1976, Visual neglect in the tree shrew after interruption of the decending projections of the deep superior colliculus. Exp. Neurol., 50:14–29.
Rehn, B., 1977, “Cerebrale Repräsentation des Fluchtverhaltens der Erdkröte (Bufo bufo)”, Ph.D. Thesis, Techn. Univ. of Darmstadt.
Rubinson, E., 1968, Projections of the tectum opticum of the frog. Brain, Behav. Evol., 1:529–561.
Scalia, F., and Coleman, D.R., 1975, Identification of telencephalic-afferent thalamic nuclei associated with the visual system of the frog, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 1:46.
Scalia, F., and Fite, K.V., 1974, A retinotopic analysis of the central connections of the optic nerve in the frog. J. Comp. Neurol., 158:455–478.
Scalia, F., and Gregory, K., 1970, Retinofugal projections in the frog: Location of the postsynaptic neurons. Brain, Behav. Evol., 3:16–29.
Schneider, D., 1954, Beitrag zu einer Analyse des Beute-und Flucht-verhaltens einheimischer Anuren. Biol. Zentralbl., 73:225–282.
Schneider, G.E., 1973, Early lesions of superior colliculus: Factors affecting the formation of abnormal retinal projections. Brain, Behav. Evol., 8:73–109.
Sperry, R.W., 1945, Restoration of vision after crossing of optic nerves and after contralateral transplantation of eye. J. Neurophysiol., 8:15–28.
Székely, G., Setalo, G., and Lazar, G., 1974, Fine structure of the frog’s optic tectum: Optic fiber termination layers. J. Hirnforsch., 14:189–225.
Trachtenberg, M.C., and Ingle, D., 1974, Thalamo-tectal projections in the frog. Brain Res., 79:419–430.
Weerasuriya, A., and Ewert, J.-P., 1981, Prey-selective neurons in the toad’s optic tectum and sensorimotor interfacing: HRP studies and recording experiments. J. Comp. Physiol., 144:429–434.
Wilczynski, W., and Northcutt, R.G., 1978, Afferents to the optic tectum of the leopard frog: An HRP study. J. Comp. Neurol., 173:219–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingle, D.J. (1983). Brain Mechanisms of Visual Localization by Frogs and Toads. In: Ewert, JP., Capranica, R.R., Ingle, D.J. (eds) Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology. NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, vol 56. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4412-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4412-4_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4414-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4412-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive