Advertisement

The Analysis of Behavioral Networks

  • John C. Fentress
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 56)

Abstract

In this paper I hope to show how one can analyze integrated patterns of vertebrate behavior at several levels of organization, a task that is obviously critical to neuroethology. Thus, as stated by Ewert (1980) in his recent scholarly survey of the field, the ultimate goal of neuroethology is to relate activity within ‘groups of interconnected nerve cells” to the’ spatially and temporally coordinated patterns of movement, that is, behavior’ (p.1). Ewert importantly also goes on to point out that: ‘Neuroethology draws its problems from the biology of behavior. The foundation of exploration is the quantitative analysis of behavior’ (p.10). It is the multilayered patterning of behavior that I wish to explore here.

Keywords

Central Pattern Generator Rattus Norvegicus Displacement Activity Model Predator Coherent Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anokhin, P.K., 1964, Systemogenesis as a general regulator of brain development. Prog. Brain Res., 9:54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attneave, F., 1959, “Applications of Information Theory to Psychology”, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, G.W., 1977, Modal action patterns, in “How Animals Communicate”, T.A. Sebeok, ed., University of Indiana Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  4. Bekoff, A., 1981, Embryonic development of the neural circuitry underlying motor coordination, in “Studies in Developmental Neurobiology: Essays in Honor of Viktor Hamburger”, W.M.Cowan, ed., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bekoff, A., and Trainer, W., 1979, Development of interlimb coordination during swimming in postnatal rats. J. Exp. Biol., 83:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellman, K., 1979, “The Conflict Behavior of the Lizard (Sceloporus occidental is) and its Implication for the Organization of Motor Behavior”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  7. Bohm, D., 1980, “Wholeness and the Implicate Order”, Routledge and Kegan, London, Boston.Google Scholar
  8. Brodal, A., 1981, “Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine”, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Bullock, T.H., In search of principles in neural integration, in “Simpler Networks and Behavior”, J.C. Fentress, ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  10. Camhi, J.M., and Nolen, T.G., 1981, Propertiese of the escape system of cockroaches during walking. J. Comp. Physiol., 142: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin, J.K., and Woodward, D.J., 1981, Modulation of sensory responsiveness of single somatosensory cortical cells during movement and arousal behaviors. Exp. Neurol., 72:164–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J.A., and Price, E.O., 1979, Grooming in the Norway rat: Displacement activity or “boundary-shift”? Behav. Neural. Biol., 26:177–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cools, A.R., 1980, Role of the neostriatal dopaminergic activity in sequencing and selecting behavioural strategies: Facilitation of processes involved in selecting the best strategy in a stressful situation. Behav. Brain Res., 1:361–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cools, A.R., Lohman, A.H.M., and van den Bercken, J.H.L., eds., 1977, “Psychobiology of the Striatum”, Elsevier North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Darwin, C., 1872, “The Expression of the Emotions in Man and the Animals”, John Murray, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delcomyn, F., 1980, Even “simple” systems are more complex than we think. The Behav. Brain Sci., 3:544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delingina, T.G., Feldman, A.G., Gelfand, I.M., and Orlovsky, G.N., 1975, On the role of central program and afferent inflow in the control of scratching movements in the cat. Brain Res., 100:297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Divac, I., and Öberg, R.G.E., eds., 1979, “The Neostriatum”, Pergamon Press, New York, Toronto.Google Scholar
  19. Ewert, J.-P., 1980, “Neuroethology”, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fentress, J.C., 1968a, Interrupted ongoing behaviour in voles (Microtus agrestis and Clethrionomys britannicus) I: Response as a function of preceding activity and the context of an apparently “irrelevant” motor pattern. Anim. Behav., 16:135–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fentress, J.C., 1968b, Interrupted ongoing behaviour in voles (Microtus agrestis and Clethrionomys britannicus) II: Extended analysis of intervening motivational variables underlying fleeing and grooming activities. Anim. Behav., 16:154–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fentress, J.C., 1972, Development and patterning of movement sequences in inbred mice, in “The Biology of Behavior”, J.A. Kiger, ed., Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  23. Fentress, J.C., 1973a, Specific and nonspecific factors in the causation of behavior, in “Perspectives in Ethology”, P.P.G. Bateson and P.H. Klopfer, eds., Plenum Press, New York, London.Google Scholar
  24. Fentress, J.C., 1973b, Development of grooming in mice with amputated forelimbs. Science, 179:704–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fentress, J.C., ed., 1976a, “Simpler Networks and Behavior”, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Fentress, J.C., 1976b, Dynamic boundaries of patterned behaviour: Interaction and self-organization, in “Growing Points in Ethology”, P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde, eds., Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  27. Fentress, J.C., 1977, The tonic hypothesis and the patterning of behavior. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 290:370–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fentress, J.C., 1978a, Mus musicus: The developmental orchestration of selected movement patterns in mice, in “The Development of Behavior: Comparative and Evolutionary Aspects”, M. Bekoff and G. Burghardt, eds., Garland Publishing Comp., New York.Google Scholar
  29. Fentress, J.C., 1978b, Conflict and context in sexual behavior, in “Biological Determinants of Sexual Behavior”, J. Hutchison, ed., Wiley, London, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Fentress, J.C., 1980, How can behavior be studied from a neuroethological perspective? in “Information Processing in the Nervous System”, H. Pinsker and W.D. Willis Jr., eds., Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Fentress, J.C., 1981a, Order in ontogeny: Relational dynamics, in “Behavioral Development”, K. Immelmann, G.W. Barlow, L. Petrinovich, and M. Main, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Fentress, J.C., 1981b, Sensorimotor development, in “The Development of Perception: Psychobiological Perspectives” Vol.1: Audition, Somatic Perception and the Chemical Senses, R.N. Aslin, J.R. Alberts and M.R. Petersen, eds., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Fentress, J.C., 1982, Ethological models of hierarchy and patterning of species-specific behavior, in “Handbook of Neurobiology: Motivation”, E. Satinoff and P. Teitelbaum, eds., Plenum Press, New York, (in press).Google Scholar
  34. Fentress, J.C., and Stilwell, F., 1973, Grammar of a movement sequence in inbred mice. Nature, 244:52–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fentress, J.C., Stanfield, B.B., and Cowan, W.M., 1981, Observations on the development of the striatum in mice and rats. Anat. Embryol., (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Forrester, R.C., and Broom, D.J., 1980, Ongoing behavior and startle responses of chicks. Behaviour, 73:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Forssberg, H., Grillner, S., and Rossignol, S., 1977, Phasic gain control of reflexes from the dorsum of the paw during spinal locomotion. Brain Res., 132:121–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fromm, C., and Evarts, E.V., 1978, Motor cortex responses to kinesthetic inputs during postural stability, precise fine movement and ballistic movement in the conscious monkey, in “Active Touch”, G. Gordon, ed., Pergamon Press, New York, Toronto.Google Scholar
  39. Gelfand, I.M., Garfinkel, V.S., Tsetlin, M.L., and Shik, M.L., 1971, Some problems in the analysis of movements, in “Models of the Structural-Functional Organization and Certain Biological Systems”, I.M. Gelfand, V.S. Garfinkel, S.V. Fomin, and M.L. Tsetlin, eds., MIT-Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  40. Gierer, A., 1981, Generation of biological patterns and form: Some physical, mathematical, and logical aspects. Prog. Biophys. Molec. Biol., 37:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gispen, W., and Isaacson, R., 1981, ACTH induced excessive grooming in the rat. Pharm. Ther., 12:209–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Golani, I., 1976, Homeostatic motor processes in mammalian interactions: A choreography of display, in “Perspectives in Ethology”, P.P.G. Bateson and P.H. Klopfer, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Golani, I., 1981, The search for invariants in motor behavior, in “Behavioral Development”, K. Immelmann, G.W. Barlow, L. Petronivich, and M. Main, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Golani, I., and Fentress, J.C., 1982, Developmental kinematics of face grooming in mice. (in prep).Google Scholar
  45. Hall, W.G., 1979, Feeding and behavioral activation in infant rats. Science, 205:206–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hannigan, J.H. Jr., and Isaacson, R.L., 1981, Conditioned excessive grooming in the rat after footshock: Effect of naloxone and situational cues. Behav. Biol., 33:280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hattori, T., and McGeer, P.L., 1973, Synaptogenesis in the corpus striatum of infant rats. Exp. Neurol., 38:70–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heiligenberg, W., 1976, A probabilistic approach to the motivation of behavior, in “Simpler Networks and Behavior”, J.C. Fentress, ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  49. Hinde, R.A., 1959, Unitary drives. Anim. Behav., 7:130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hinde, R.A., 1970, “Animal Behavior: A Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology” (2nd edn.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Holst, E. von, 1939, Die relative Koordination als Phänomen und als Methode zentral nervöser Funktionsanalyse. Ergeb. Physiol., 13:228–306.Google Scholar
  52. Holst, E. von, and Saint Paul, U. von, 1960, Vom Wirkungsgefüge der Triebe. Naturwissenschaften, 47:409–422”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Iersel, J.J.A.van, and Bol, A.C.A., 1958, Preening of two tern species. A study of displacement activities. Behaviour, 13:1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kolb, B., and Whishaw, I.W., 1981, Decortication of rats in infancy or adulthood produced comparable functional losses on learned and species-typical behaviors. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 95:468–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kupfermann, I., and Weiss, K.R., 1978, The command neuron concept. The Behav. Brain Sci., 1:3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lashley, K.S., 1951, The problem of serial order in behavior, in “Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior”, L.A. Jeffress, ed., John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Lorenz, K., 1981, “The Foundations of Ethology”, Springer, New York, Wien.Google Scholar
  58. Luria, A.R., 1976, “Basic Problems of Neurolinguistics”, Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Machlis, L., 1977, An analysis of the temporal patterning of pecking in chicks. Behaviour, 63:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Machlis, L., 1980, Apomorphine: Effects on the timing and sequencing of pecking behavior in chicks. Pharm. Biochem. Behav., 13:331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Malsburg, C. von der, and Willshaw, D., 1981, Co-operativity and brain organization. TINS, 4:80–83.Google Scholar
  62. McFarland, D.J., 1969, Mechanisms of behavioural disinhibition. Anim. Behav., 17:238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Murphy, M.R., MacLean, P.D., Hamilton, S.C., 1981, Species-typical behavior of hamsters deprived from birth of the neocortex. Science, 213:459–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oppenheim, R.W., 1981, Ontogenetic adaptations and retrogressive processes in the development of the nervous system and behaviour: A neuroembryological perspective, in “Maturation and Development”, H. Precht and K. Connelly, eds., J.Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  65. Pearson, K.G., 1981, Interneurones and locomotion. TINS, 4:128–131.Google Scholar
  66. Polit, A., and Bizzi, E., 1979, Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol., 42:183–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Quine, W.V., 1969m “Ontological Relativity and Other Essays”, Columbia University Press, New York, London.Google Scholar
  68. Richmond, G., and Sachs, G.B., 1980, Grooming in Norway rats: The development and adult expression of a complex motor pattern. Behaviour, 75:82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robbins, T.W., and Fray, P.J., 1980, Stress-induced eating: fact, fiction or misunderstanding? Appetite, 1:103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rolls, E.T., 1981, Processing beyond the inferior temporal visual cortex realated to feeding, memory, and striatal function, in “Brain Mechanisms of Sensation”, Katsuki, Norgren, and Sato, eds., John Wiley and Sons., New York.Google Scholar
  71. Roper, T.J., and Posadas-Andrews, A., 1981, Are schedule-induced drinking and displacement activities causally related? Quart. J. Exper. Psychol., 33:181–193.Google Scholar
  72. Saito, K., 1979, Development of spinal reflexes in the rat fetus studied in vitro. J. Physiol., 294:581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Selverston, A.I., 1980, Are central pattern generators understandable? The Behav. Brain. Sci., 3:535–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sevenster, P., 1961, A causal analysis of a displacement activity (Fanning in Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour Suppl., 9:1–170.Google Scholar
  75. Shepherd, G.M., 1979, “The Synaptic Organization of the Brain” (2nd edn.), Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Tinbergen, N., 1951, “The Study of Instinct”, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  77. Tinbergen, N., 1952, Derived activities: Their causation, biological significance, origin and emancipation during evolution. Quart. Rev. Biol., 27:1–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Verley, R., and Onnen, I., 1981, Somatotopic organization of the tactile thalamus in normal adult and developing mice and in adult mice dewhiskered since birth. J. Exper. Neurol., 72:462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whitehead, A.N., 1978, “Process and Reality” (Corrected edition of 1929 original publication, Macmillian Publishing Company) D.R. Griffin and D.W. Sherburne, eds., MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  80. Woolridge, M.W., 1975, “A Quantitative Analysis of Short-Term Rhythmical Behaviour in Rodents”, Ph.D.Thesis, Wolfson College, Oxford, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Fentress
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Psychology and BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations