Effect of Signal Orientation on the Firing of Electrosensory Cells in the Electric Fish Eigenmannia

  • Brian L. Partridge
  • Walter Heiligenberg
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 56)


Animals respond to only a relatively small fraction of stimuli in the environment. A recurring question facing investigators of sensory processing is how the nervous system filters and processes information to recognize behaviorally relevant stimuli. An attractive working hypothesis is that systems are hardwired in such a way that a particular unit or class of units responds when the animal encounters the appropriate stimulus or combination of stimuli for a particular behavior. Recent studies have supported an alternate hypothesis, based upon quite different design criteria. Rather than discrete feature detectors tuned to, for instance, the fundamental frequency of a mating call, investigators have found populations of cells with a wide range of tunings but with a preponderance of cells firing in response to a particular range of the behaviorally relevant variable (R.R. Capranica, this volume).


Electric Organ Discharge Identical Geometry Electric Fish Field Geometry Torus Semicircularis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bastian, J., and Heiligenberg, W., 1980a, Neural correlates of the Jamming Avoidance Response in Eigenmannia. J. Comp. Physiol., 136:135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian, J., and Heiligenberg, W., 1980b, Phase-sensitive midbrain neurons in Eigenmannia: Neural correlates of the Jamming Avoidance Response. Science, 209:828–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrend, K., 1976, Processing information carried in a high frequency wave: A study on the properties of cerebellar units in high frequency electric fish. J. Comp. Physiol., 118:357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock, T.H., and Chichibu, S., 1965, Further analysis of sensory coding in electroreceptors of electric fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 54:422–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullock, T.H., Hamstra, R.H., and Scheich, H., 1972, The Jamming Avoidance Response in high frequency electric fish. J. Comp. Physiol., 77:1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, C.E., Maler, L., Heiligenberg, W., and Sas, E., 1981, Laminar organisation of the afferent and efferent systems of the torus semicircularis of gymnotiform fish: Morphological substrates for parallel processing in the electrosensory system. J. Comp. Neurol., (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Enger, P.S., and Szabo, T., 1965, Activity of central neurons involved in electroreception in some weakly electric fish (Gymnotidae). J. Neurophysiol., 28:800–818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heiligenberg, W., and Bastian, J., 1980, The control of Eigenmannia’s pacemaker by distributed evaluation of electroreceptive afferences. J. Comp. Physiol., 136:113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heiligenberg, W., and Partridge, B.L., 1981, How electro-receptors encode JAR-eliciting stimulus regimes: Reading trajectories in a phase-amplitude plane. J. Comp. Physiol., 142:295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heiligenberg, W., Baker, C., and Matsubara, J., 1978, The Jamming Avoidance Response in Eigenmannia revisited: The structure of a neuronal democracy. J. Comp. Physiol., 127:267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heiligenberg, W., Finger, T., Matsubara, J., and Carr, C., 1981, Missing links in the neuronal hardware of the jamming avoidance response in the electric fish Eigenmannia. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 10:207.Google Scholar
  12. Matsubara, J., 1980, Neural correlates of a non-jammable electrolocation system, (in prep.).Google Scholar
  13. Matsubara, J., and Heiligenberg, W., 1978, How well do electric fish electrolocate under jamming? J. Comp. Physiol., 125:285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Partridge, B.L., and Heiligenberg, W., 1980, Three’s a crowd? Predicting Eigenmannia’s responses to multiple jamming. J. Comp. Physiol., 136:153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Partridge, B.L., Heiligenberg, W., and Matsubara, J., 1981, The neural basis of a sensory filter in the Jamming Avoidance Response: No “grandmother cells” in sight. J. Comp. Physiol., 145:153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scheich, H., 1974, Neuronal analysis of a wave in the time domain: Midbrain units in the electric fish during social behavior. Science, 185:365–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheich, H., 1977, Neural basis of communication in the high frequency electric fish Eigenmannia virescens (Jamming Avoidance Response). J. Comp. Physiol., 113:181–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scheich, H., and Bullock, T.H., 1974, The role of electroreceptors in the animal’s life II: The detection of electric fields from electric organs, in “Handbook of Sensory Physiology” Vol. III/3, A. Fessard, ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Scheich, H., Bullock, T.H., and Hamstra, R.H., 1973, Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: High frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish Eigenmannia. J. Neurophysiol., 36:39–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlegal, P.A., 1973, Perception of objects in weakly electric fish Gymnotus carapo as studied in recordings from rhombencephalic neurons. Exp. Brain Res., 18:340–354.Google Scholar
  21. Zipser, B., and Bennett, M.V.L., 1976, Responses of cells of the posterior lateral line lobe to activation of electro-receptors in a mormyrid fish. J. Neurophysiol., 39:693–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian L. Partridge
    • 1
    • 2
  • Walter Heiligenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniv. MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.Scripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations