The Induction of Resistance to Alkylation Damage in Mammalian Cells

  • Leona Samson
  • Jeffrey L. Schwartz
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (volume 15)


We are continuously exposed to non-toxic levels of carcinogens both from our environment and from our diet. It would therefore seem important to determine how cells respond to this particular kind of treatment. Some years ago, an attempt to simulate this chronic environmental exposure to mutagens revealed the existence of an inducible antimutagenic DNA repair pathway in E. coli — the adaptive DNA repair pathway (1). The obvious progression from finding a new type of DNA repair in E. coli was to ask whether an equivalent pathway exists in mammalian cells, and ultimately whether it exists in human cells. We now have good biological evidence for the existence of an adaptive DNA repair pathway in cultured rodent and human cell lines (2). In order to set the scene for our recent findings in mammalian cells, we should first consider what is presently known about E. coli adaptation.


Adaptive Response Sister Chromatid Exchange GM637 Cell Methyl Guanine Alkylation Damage 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Samson, L. and Cairns, J: A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia cola. Nature (London), 267: 281 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samson, L. and Schwartz, J.L: Evidence for an adaptive DNA repair pathway in Chinese hamster ovary and human skin fibroblast cell lines. Nature, 287: 861 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeggo, P., Defais, M., Samson, L. and Schendel, P: An adaptive response of E. coli to low levels of alkylating agent: Comparison with previously characterized DNA repair pathways. Molec. gen. Genet., 157: 1 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samson, L: Studies on mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeggo, P., Defais, M., Samson, L. and Schendel, P: The adaptive response of E. coli to low levels of alkylating agent: The role of pol A in killing adaptation. Molec. gen. Genet., 162: 299 (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeggo, P: Isolation and characterization of E. coli K-12 mutants unable to induce the adaptive response to simple alkylating agents. J. Bact., 139: 783 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker, R.M., Van Voorhis, W.C. and Spencer, L.A: HeLa cell variants that differ in sensitivity to monofunctional alkylating agents, with independence of cytotoxic and mutagenic responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 5249 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lawley, P.D. and Thatcher, C-J: Methylation of DNA in cultured mammalian cells by N-methyl-N’-nitro-nitroseguanidine. Biochem. J., 116: 693 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loveless, A: Possible relevance of 0–6 alkylation of deoxyguanosine to the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of nitrosamines and nitrosamides. Nature, 233: 206 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerchman, L. and Ludlum, D.B: The properties of 06-methylguanine in templates for DNA polymerase. Biochim. biophys. Acta 308: 310 (1973).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goth, R. and Rajewsky, M.F: Persistence of 06-ethylguanine in rat-brain DNA: correlation with nervous system-specific carcinogenesis by ethylnitrosourea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 71: 639 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schendel, P-F and Robins, P.E: Repair of 06-methylguanine in adapted E. coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 75: 6017 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robins, P. and Cairns, J: Quantitation of the adaptive response to alkylating agents. Nature, 280: 74 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cairns, J: Efficiency of the adaptive response of E. coli to alkylating agents. Nature, 286: 176 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karran, P., Lindahl, T. and Griffin, B: Adaptive response to alkylating agents involves alteration in situ of 06-methylguanine residues in DNA. Nature, 280: 76 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foote, R.S., Mitra, S. and Pal, B.C: Demethylation of 06methylguanine in a synthetic DNA polymer by an inducible activity in E. cola. Submitted to Biochem. biophys. Acta.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olsson, M. and Lindahl, T: Repair of alkylated DNA in E. coli. J. Biol. Chem., 255: 10569 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindahl, T: DNA methyltransferase acting on 06-methylguanine residues in adapted E. coli in Chromosome Damage and Repair, Ed. by E. Seeberg. Plenum Press, in press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schendel, P.F., Defais, M., Jeggo, P., Samson, L. and Cairns, J: Pathways of mutagenesis and repair in Escherichia coli exposed to low levels of simple alkylating agents. J. Bact., 135: 466 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lindahl, T: Personal communication.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montesano, R., Bresil, H. and Margison, G.P: Increased excision of 06-methylguanine from rat liver DNA after chronic administration of dimethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res., 39: 1798 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montesano, R., Bresil, H., Planch-Martel, G.P. and Pegg, A.E: Effect of chronic treatment of rats with dimethylnitrosamine on the removal of 06-methylguanine from DNA. Cancer Res., 40: 452 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. 1:95 (1972).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carrano, A.V., Thompson, L.H., Lindl, P.A. and Minkler, J.L: Sister chromatid exchange as an indicator of mutagenesis. Nature, 271: 551 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wolf, S., Rodin, B. and Cleaver, J.E: Sister chromatid exchanges induced by mutagenic carcinogens in normal and xeroderma pigmentosum cells. Nature, 265: 347 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jensen, E.M., LaPolla, R.J., Kirby, P.E. and Haworth, S.R: In vitro studies of chemical mutagens and carcinogens. 1. Stability studies in cell culture medium. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 59: 941 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bodell, W.J. and Banerjee, M.R: Reduced DNA repair in mouse satellite DNA after treatment with methylmethansulphonate and methylnitrosourea. Nucl. Acids Res., 3: 1689. (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolf, S. and Perry, P: Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography. Chromosoma, 48: 341 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jostes, R., Samson, L. and Schwartz, J.L: Kinetics of mutation and sister-chromatid exchange induction by ethylmethanesulphonate in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutation Res., 91: 255 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Warren, W., Carthorn, A.R. and Shooter, K.V: The stability of methylated purines and of methylphosphotriesters in the DNA of V79 cells after treatment with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Biochim. biophys. Acta, 563: 82 (1979).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goth-Goldstein, R: Inability of Chinese hamster ovary cells to excise 06-alkylguanine. Cancer Res., 40: 2623 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis, J. G. and Swenberg, J. A.: Differential repair of 06-methylguanine in DNA of rat hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. Nature, 286: 185 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leona Samson
    • 1
  • Jeffrey L. Schwartz
    • 2
  1. 1.Biochemistry DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Lab of RadiobiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations