Advertisement

New Strategy to Tackle Breeding Problems of Potato

  • G. Wenzel
  • V. A. Bapat
  • H. Uhrig
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 22)

Abstract

Indian and German potato growing have one common possession: the growing area for potatoes of about 500,000 ha is identical. For a small country like Germany this is, however, a relatively large area, and it demonstrates the importance of potato as one of the central German crops. It ranks on the fourth position after wheat, barley and sugar beet. On the other hand, in Germany the importance of potato is decreasing, while in India — like in most countries with subtropical climatic areas, cultivation of potato is increasing. Consequently, it should be useful to discuss possibilities and approaches to the present situation of how the breeding of new potato varieties may be enhanced.

Keywords

Anther Culture Protoplast Fusion Fusion Product Microspore Culture Macroscopic Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.G. Th. Hermsen and J. Verdenius, Selection from Solanum tuberosum group phureja of genotypes combining high frequency haploid induction with homozygosity for empryo spot, Euphytica, 22:244 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.K. Sopory, E. Jacobsen and G. Wenzel, Production of monohaploid embryoids and plantlets in cultured anthers of Solanum tuberosum, Plant Sci. Lett., 12:47 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Murashige and F. Skoog, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture, Physiol. Plant., 15:473 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.N. Kao and M.R. Michayluk, Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media, Planta, 126:105 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Binding, R. Nehls, O. Schieder, S.K. Sopory and G. Wenzel, Regeneration of mesophyll protoplasts isolated form dihaploid clones of Solanum tuberosum, Physiol. Plant., 43:52 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.A. Keller and G. Melchers, The effect of high pH and calcium on tobacco protoplast fusion, Z. Naturforsch, 28c:737 (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.N. Kao and M.R. Michayluk, A method for high-frequency intergeneric fusion of plant protoplasts, Planta, 115:355 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Wenzel, Protoplast techniques incorporated into applied breeding programs, in: “Advances in Protoplast Research,” L. Ferenczy and G.L. Farkas, eds., Pergamon Press, London (1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.S. Chase, Analytical Breeding in Solanum tuberosum L. A scheme utilizing parthenotes and other diploid stocks, Can. J. Genet., 5:359 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.M. Dunwell and N. Sunderland, Anther culture of Solanum tuberosum L., Euphytica, 22:317 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Wenzel, C. Meyer, T. Przewozny, H. Uhrig and O. Schieder, Incorporation of microspore and protoplast techniques into potato breeding programs, in: “Plant Regeneration and Genetic Variability,” E. Earl, ed., Praeger Publishers, New York (in press), (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.D. Upadhya, Potential for potato production from true seed under developing country condition, in: “Production of Potatoes from True Seed,” CIP, Lima (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Jacobsen, Doubling dihaploid potato clones via leaf tissue culture, Z. Pflanzensuchtg, 80:80 (1978).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Wenzel, O. Schieder, T. Przewozny, S.K. Sopory and G. Melchers, Comparison of single cell culture derived Solanum tuberosum L. plants and a model for their application in breeding programs, Theor. Appl. Genet., 55:49 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Wenzel and H. Uhrig, Breeding for nematode and virus resistance in potato via anther culture, Theor. Appl. Genet., 59:333 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Schieder and I. K. Vasil, Protoplast fusion and somatic hybridization, Intl. Rev. Cytol. Suppl., 11B:21 (1980).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Uhrig, Regeneration of protoplasts of dihaploid potato plants bleached by a herbicide (SAN 6706), Mol. Gen. Genet., 181:403 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y.Y. Gleba and F. Hoffmann, Hybrid cell lines Arabidopsis thaliana + Brassica campestris: No evidence for specific chromosome elimination, Molec. Gen. Genet., 165:523 (1978).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Behnke, Selection of potato callus for resistance to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans and regeneration of resistant plants, Theor. Appl. Genet., 55:69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.J. Larkin and W.R. Scowcroft, Somaclonal variation a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement, Theor. Appl. Genet., 60:197 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Foroughi-Wehr, W. Friedt and G. Wenzel, Field experiments with anther derived barley and rye, this volume, (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Wenzel
    • 1
  • V. A. Bapat
    • 2
  • H. Uhrig
    • 3
  1. 1.Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land-und-ForstwirtschaftInstitut für ResistenzgenetikGrünbachFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Bio-Organic DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreBombayIndia
  3. 3.Max-Planck-Institut für ZüchtungsforschungErwin Baur InstitutKöln 30 (Vogelsang)Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations