Mechanisms of Uptake into Plant Protoplasts

  • Kenneth L. Giles
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 22)


Studies on membrane fusion performed using lipid vesicles as model membrane systems have proven a powerful tool in the investigation of the mechanism of membrane interaction at the molecular level. Phospholipid vesicles, called liposomes, are stable structures with a limited permeability to small ions and large molecules and have been described extensively in literature (1, 2, 3). Since the construction of liposomes can be varied from single component systems to mixtures of various lipids differing both in their head group and hydrocarbon chain configuration as well as their charge, questions relating to head group specificity, bilayer fluidity, phase transitions and separations, and temperature dependent phase changes of the lipids can be studied. It is also possible to insert into the membrane other components such as cholesterol, glycolipids and proteins, as well as antibodies. Another advantage of these artificial vesicles is that known membrane-active drugs and molecules which are known to effect membrane fusion can be incorporated into the membrane and their mode of action studied in detail.


Membrane Fusion Lipid Vesicle Phospholipid Vesicle Plant Protoplast Petite Mutant 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T.E. Thompson and F.A. Henn, Experimental phospholipid model membranes, in: “Membranes of Mitochondria and Chloroplasts,” E. Racker, ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Papahadjopoulos and H.K. Kimelberg, Phospholipid vesicles (liposomes) as models for biological membranes: their properties and interactions with cholesterol and proteins, in: “Progress in Surface Science,” S.G. Davison, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, England (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.D. Bangham, M.W. Hill and N.G.A. Miller, Preparation and use of liposomes as models of biological membranes, in: “Methods in Membrane Biology,” E.D. Korne, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Maeda and S.-I. Ohnishi, Membrane fusion transfer of phospholipid molecules between phospholipid bilayer membranes, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 60:1509–1516 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Papahadjopoulos, G. Poste, B.E. Schaeffer and W.J. Vail, Membrane fusion and molecular segregation in phospholipid vesicles, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 352:10–28 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Prestegard and B. Fellmeth, Fusion of dimyristoyl lecithin vesicles as studied by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Biochemistry 13:1122–1126 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.L.Y. Lau and S.I. Chan, Alamethicin-mediated fusion of lecithin vesicles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:2170–2174 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.J. Martin and R.C. MacDonald, Phospholipid exchange between bilayer membrane vesicles, Biochem. 15:321–327 (1976a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.W. Pohl, G. Stack and H.W. Trissl, Interaction of liposomes with black lipid membranes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 318:478–481 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.R. Moore, Fusion of liposomes containing conductance probes with black lipid films, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 426:765–771 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Miller and E. Racker, Fusion of phospholipid vesicles reconstituted with cytochrome C oxidase and mitochondrial hydrophobic protein, J. Mem. Biol. 26:319–333 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Papahadjopoulos, W.J. Vail, W.A. Pangborn and G. Poste, Studies on membrane fusion. II. Induction of fusion in pure phospholipid membranes by calcium and other divalent metals, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 448:265–283 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Papahadjopoulos, W.J. Vail, C. Newton, S. Nir, K. Jacobson, G. Poste and R. Lazo, Studies on membrane fusion. III. The role of calcium-induced phase changes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 465:579–598 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Van der Bosch and H.M. McConnell, Fusion of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine vesicle membranes induced by Concanavalin A, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:4409–4413 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.E. Pagano and J. N. Weinstein, Interactions of liposomes with mammalian cells, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 7:435–468 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Fraley, S. Subramani, P. Berg and D. Papahadjopoulos, Introduction of liposome-encapsulated SV40 DNA into cells, J. Biol. Chem. (in press) (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Wilson, D. Papahadjopoulos and R. Taber, The introduction of poliovirus RNA into cells via lipid vesicles, Cell 17:77–84 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Heath, R. Fraley and D. Papahadjopoulos, Antibody targeting of liposomes. Specific interaction of vesicles conjugated to anti-erythrocyte F (ab′)2, (Submitted) (1980).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Heath, B. Macher and D. Papahadjopoulos, Covalent attachment of proteins to liposomes via glycosphingolipids. I. Oxidation of vesicle lipids and aqueous contents, (Submitted) (1980).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.C. Cassells, Uptake of charged lipid vesicles by isolated tomato protoplasts, Nature 275:760 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Matthews, D. Sheldon, J. Widholm and M. Ostro, Liposome mediated transfer of bacterial RNA into carrot protoplasts, Planta 145:37–44 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P.F. Lurquin, Entrapment of plasmid DNA by liposomes and their interactions with plant protoplasts, Nucleic Acid Res. (in press) (1980).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P.F. Lurquin and C.I. Kado, Escherichia coli plasmid pBR313 insertion into plant protoplasts and into their nuclei, Mol. Gen. Genet. 154:113–121 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B.G. Hughes, F.G. White and M.A. Smith, Fate of bacterial plasmid DNA during uptake by barley protoplasts, FEBS Lett. 79:80–84 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    B.G. Hughes, F.G. White and M.A. Smith, Contribution of damaged protoplasts to DNA uptake by purified plant protoplasts, Plant Sci. Lett. 11:199–206 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Suzuki and I. Takebe, Uptake of single-stranded bacteriophage DNA by isolated tobacco protoplasts, Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 78:421–433 (1976).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.M. Fernandez, P.F. Lurquin and C.I. Kado, Incorporation and maintenance of recombinant-DNA plasmid vehicles pBR313 and pCRl in plant protoplasts, FEBS Lett. 87:277–282 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.I. Kado and P.F. Lurquin, in: “Microbiology 1978,” (1978).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P.F. Lurquin and L. Marton, DNA transfer experiments with plant protoplasts and bacterial plasmids, in: “Proc. Fifth Intl. Protoplast Symp.,” (1980).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    U. Kuck, U. Stahl and K. Esser, Curr. Gen. 3:151–156 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    U. Stahl, U. Kuck, P. Tudzynski and K. Esser, Mol. Gen. Genet. 178:639–646 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.H. Cummings, L. Belocur and C. Grandchamp, Mol. Gen. Genet. 171:239–250 (1979b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    N.W. Gillham, “Organelle Heredity,” Raven Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C.E. Caten, J. Gen Microbiol. 72:221–229 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    C.M. Lazarus, A.J. Earl, G. Turner and H. Kuntzel, Eur. J. Biochem. 106:633–641 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R.J. Kemble and J.R. Bedbrook, Nature 284:565–566 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth L. Giles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and BiotechnologyWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations